Managed Care, Inter-agency Linkages, and Outpatient Substance Abuse Treatment

  • W. Craig Carter
  • Shoou-Yih D. Lee
  • Kathleen C. Thomas
  • Joseph Morrissey
Article

 

Although treatment of co-occurring behavioral and physical health problems could be facilitated by the linkages between health care providers, it is uncertain how such inter-agency linkages are affected by managed care. We used a sample of 167 service linkages to examine the effects of managed care arrangements on inter-agency communication, coordination, and perceived effectiveness. These linkages were identified based on interviews with 62 outpatient substance abuse treatment units in 2000. Results indicate that frequency of communication and inter-agency coordination are positively related to several managed care arrangements and may moderate the relationships between managed care arrangements and perceived effectiveness.

KEY WORDS

communication coordination effectiveness inter-agency linkages managed care arrangements 

References

  1. Ahrens M. P. (1998). A model for dual disorder treatment in acute psychiatry in a VA population. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 15:107–112CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Alexander J.A., Lemak C.H. (1997a). Directors’ perceptions of the effects of managed care in outpatient substance abuse treatment. Journal of Substance Abuse 9:1–14CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alexander J.A., Lemak C.H. (1997b). The effects of managed care on administrative burden in outpatient substance abuse treatment facilities. Medical Care 35(10):1060–1068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bachmann K.M., Moggi F., Hirsbrunner H.P., Donati R., Brodbeck J. (1997). An integrated treatment program for dually diagnosed patients. Psychiatric Services 48:314–316PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Bachrach L.L. (1987). The chronic mental patient with substance abuse problems. New Directions for Mental Health Services 35(Fall):29–41PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bird D.C., Lambert D., Hartley D., Beeson P.G., Coburn A.F. (1998). Rural models for integrating primary care and mental health services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 25(3):287–308CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Calloway M.O., Morrissey J.P. (1998). Overcoming service barriers for homeless persons with serious psychiatric disorders. Psychiatric Services 49(12):1568–1572PubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Cherubin C.E., Sapira J.D. (1993). The medical complications of drug addiction and the medical assessment of the intravenous drug user: 25 years later. Annals of Internal Medicine 119:1017–1028PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Christianson J., Lurie N., Finch M., Moscovice I., Hartley D. (1992). Use of community-based mental health programs by HMO’s: Evidence from the Medicaid Demonstration. American Journal of Public Health 82(6):790–98PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. D’Aunno T. (1997). Linking substance-abuse treatment and primary health care. In: Edgerton J.A., Fox D.M., Leshner A.I. (eds), Treating Drug Abusers Effectively. London, Basil Blackwell, pp. 312–331Google Scholar
  11. Drake R.E., Mercer-McFadden C., Mueser K.T., McHugo G.J., Bond G.R. (1998). Review of integrated mental health and substance abuse treatment for patients with dual disorders. Schizophrenia Bulletin 24:589–608PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Friedmann P.D., Alexander J.A., D’Annuo T.A. (1997). Organizational correlates of access to primary care and mental health services in drug abuse treatment units. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 16(1):71–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gabel S. (1998). Leadership in the managed care era: Challenges, conflict, ambivalence. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 26(1):3–19CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Galanter M., Keller D.S., Dermatis H., Egelko S. (2000). The impact of managed care on substance abuse treatment. Journal of Addictive Diseases 19(3):13–34CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Grella C.E., Gilmore J. (2002). Improving service delivery to the dually diagnosed in Los Angeles County. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 23:115–122CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Hamilton-Brown A., Grella E., Cooper L. (2002). Living it or learning it: attitudes and beliefs about experience and expertise in treatment for the dually diagnosed. Contemporary Drug Problems 29: 687–710, (Winter)Google Scholar
  17. Hubbard R.L., Marsden M.E., Rachal J.V., Harwood H.J., Cavanaugh E.R., Ginzburg H.M. (1989). Drug abuse treatment: a national study of effectiveness. Chapel Hill, The University of North Carolina PressGoogle Scholar
  18. Kaluzny A., Zuckerman H., Rabiner D. (1998). Interorganizational factors affecting the delivery of primary care to older Americans. Health Services Research 33: 381–400, (2, June Part II)PubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Kavanagh D.J., Greenaway J.L., Saunders J.B., White A., Sorban J., Hamilton G. (2000). Contrasting views and experiences of health professionals on the management of comorbid substance misuse and mental disorders. Australian & New Zealand Journal of Psychiatry 34(2):279–289CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Kirschner S.R., Lachicotte W.S. (2001). Managing Managed Care: Habitus, hysteresis and the end(s) of psychotherapy. Culture, Medicine and Psychiatry 25:441–456CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Lemak C.H., Alexander J.A. (2001). Managed care and outpatient substance abuse treatment intensity. The Journal of Behavioral health Services & Research 28(1):12–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. O’Connor P.G., Molde S., Henry S., Shockcor W.T., Schottenfel R.S. (1992). Human immunodeficiency virus infection in intravenous drug users: A model for primary care. American Journal of Medicine 93:382–386CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Osher F.C., Drake R.E. (1996). Reversing a history of unmet needs: Approaches to care for persons with co-occurring addictive and mental disorders. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry 66(1):4–11CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Primm A.B., Gomez M.B., Tzolova-Iontchev I., Perry W., Vu T.H., & Crum R.M. (2000). Mental health versus substance abuse treatment programs for dually diagnosed patients. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment 19:285–290CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Ridgely S., Goldman H. H., Willenbring M. (1990). Barriers to the care of persons with dual diagnoses: Organizational and financing issues. Schizophrenia Bulletin 16:123–132PubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Ridgely M.S., Mulkern V., Giard J., Shern D. (2002) Critical elements of public-sector managed behavioral health programs for severe mental illness in five states. Psychiatric Services 53(4):397–399CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Rohrer J.E., Rohland B.M., Westermann J., Knott A., Zwick J. (1999). Managed care for substance abuse treatment: Impact in Iowa. Administration and Policy in Mental Health 26(6):429–433CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Rosenheck R. (1988). System dynamics in complex psychiatric treatment organizations. Psychiatry 51(2):211–220PubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Stein M.D., Samet J.H., O’Connor P.G. (1993). The linkage of primary care services with substance abuse treatment: New opportunities for academic generalists. Journal of General Internal Medicine 8:106–107CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Van de Ven A.H., Ferry D.L. (1980). Measuring and Assessing Organizations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  31. Van de Ven A.H.,Walker G. (1984). The dynamics of interorganizational coordination. Administrative Science Quarterly 29(4):598–621CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, Inc. 2006

Authors and Affiliations

  • W. Craig Carter
    • 1
    • 4
  • Shoou-Yih D. Lee
    • 2
  • Kathleen C. Thomas
    • 3
  • Joseph Morrissey
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyMiddle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA
  2. 2.Department of Health Policy and Administration, School of Public HealthThe University of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
  3. 3.Cecil G. Sheps Center for Health Services ResearchUniversity of North CarolinaChapel HillUSA
  4. 4.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyMiddle Tennessee State UniversityMurfreesboroUSA

Personalised recommendations