Applied Categorical Structures

, Volume 19, Issue 1, pp 301–319 | Cite as

Connected and Disconnected Maps

Article

Abstract

A new relation between morphisms in a category is introduced—roughly speaking (accurately in the categories Set and Top), f ∥ g iff morphisms w:dom(f)→dom(g) never map subobjects of fibres of f non-constantly to fibres of g. (In the algebraic setting replace fibre with kernel.) This relation and a slight weakening of it are used to define “connectedness” versus “disconnectedness” for morphisms. This parallels and generalises the classical treatment of connectedness versus disconnectedness for objects in a category (in terms of constant morphisms). The central items of study are pairs \(({\mathcal F},{\mathcal G})\) of classes of morphisms which are corresponding fixed points of the polarity induced by the ∥-relation. Properties of such pairs are examined and in particular their relation to (pre)factorisation systems is analysed. The main theorems characterise:
  1. (a)

    factorisation systems which factor morphisms through a regular epimorphic “connected” morphism followed by a “disconnected” morphism, and

     
  2. (b)

    pairs \(({\mathcal F},{\mathcal G})\) consisting of “connected” versus “disconnected” morphisms which induce a (regular) factorisation system.

     
This suggests a generalisation of the pair (Concordant, Dissonant) of classes of continuous maps which was shown by Collins to yield the factorisation system (Concordant quotient, Dissonant) on Top.

Keywords

Concordant Dissonant Connected Disconnected Torsion Torsion free Factorisation system 

Mathematics Subject Classifications (2000)

18A20 18A32 18B30 54C10 54D05 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Adámek, J, Herrlich, H., Strecker, G.: Abstract and Concrete Categories. Wiley, New York (1990)MATHGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Arhangel′skiĭ, A.V., Wiegandt, R.: Connectednesses and disconnectednesses in topology. Gen. Topol. Appl. 5, 9–33 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Börger, R., Tholen, W.: Concordant-dissonant and monotone-light. In: Categorical Topology (Toledo, Ohio, 1983). Sigma Ser. Pure Math., vol. 5, pp. 90–107. Heldermann, Berlin (1984)Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Boxall, G.: Generalising the concordant-dissonant factorisation. Master’s thesis, University of Cape Town (2005)Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Carboni, A., Janelidze, G., Kelly, G., Paré, R.: On localization and stabilization for factorization systems. Appl. Categ. Struct. 5, 1–58 (1997)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Castellini, G., Holgate, D.: A link between two connectedness notions. Appl. Categ. Struct. 11(5), 473–486 (2003)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Clementino, M.M., Tholen, W.: Separation versus connectedness. Topol. its Appl. 75, 143–181 (1997)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Clementino, M.M., Tholen, W.: Separated and connected maps. Appl. Categ. Struct. 6(3), 373–401 (1998)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Collins, P.J.: Concordant mappings and the concordant-dissonant factorization of an arbitrary continuous function. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 27, 587–591 (1971)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Collins, P.J., Dyckhoff, R.: Connexion properties and factorisation theorems. In: Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Categorical Topology (Univ. Cape Town, Cape Town, 1976). Quaestiones Math., vol. 2, pp. 103–112. (1977/78)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Dickson, S.E.: A torsion theory for Abelian categories. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 121, 223–235 (1966)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Eilenberg, S.: Sur les transformations continues d’espaces métriques compacts. Fundam. Math. 22, 292–296 (1934)Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Freyd, P.J., Kelly, G.M.: Categories of continuous functors, I. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 2, 169–191 (1972)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Fried, E., Wiegandt, R.: Connectednesses and disconnectednesses of graphs. Algebra Univers. 5(3), 411–428 (1975)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Herrlich, H.: Topologische Reflexionen und Coreflexionen. LNM, vol. 78. Springer, Verlag (1968)MATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Herrlich, H., Salicrup, G., Vazquez, R.: Dispersed factorization structures. Can. J. Math. 31(5), 1059–1071 (1979)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Janelidze, G., Tholen, W.: Functorial factorization, well-pointedness and separability. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 142(2), 99–130 (1999)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Preuß, G.: Über den E-zusammenhang und seine Lokalisation. Ph.D. thesis, Freie Universität, Berlin (1967)Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Preuß, G.: E̱-zusammenhängende Räume. Manuscr. Math. 3, 331–342 (1970)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Preuß, G.: Trennung und Zusammenhang. Monatsh. Math. 74, 70–87 (1970)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Preuss, G.: Connection properties in topological categories and related topics. In: Categorical Topology (Proc. Internat. Conf., Free Univ. Berlin, Berlin, 1978). Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 719, pp. 293–307. Springer, Berlin (1979)Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Salicrup, G., Vázquez, R.: Connection and disconnection. In: Categorical Topology (Proc. Internat. Conf., Free Univ. Berlin, Berlin, 1978). Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 719, pp. 326–344. Springer, Berlin (1979)Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Strecker, G.E.: Component properties and factorizations. In: Topological Structures (Proc. Sympos. in Honour of Johannes de Groot (1914–1972), Amsterdam, 1973), pp. 123–140. Math. Centre Tracts, No. 52. Math. Centrum, Amsterdam (1974)Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Tiller, J.A.: Component subcategories. Quaest. Math. 4(1), 19–40 (1980/81)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Whyburn, G.T.: Non-alternating transformations. Am. J. Math. 56, 294–302 (1934)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Pure MathematicsUniversity of LeedsLeedsUK
  2. 2.Department of Mathematical SciencesUniversity of StellenboschStellenboschSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations