Connected and Disconnected Maps
Article
First Online:
Received:
Accepted:
- 77 Downloads
- 1 Citations
Abstract
A new relation between morphisms in a category is introduced—roughly speaking (accurately in the categories Set and Top), f ∥ g iff morphisms w:dom(f)→dom(g) never map subobjects of fibres of f non-constantly to fibres of g. (In the algebraic setting replace fibre with kernel.) This relation and a slight weakening of it are used to define “connectedness” versus “disconnectedness” for morphisms. This parallels and generalises the classical treatment of connectedness versus disconnectedness for objects in a category (in terms of constant morphisms). The central items of study are pairs \(({\mathcal F},{\mathcal G})\) of classes of morphisms which are corresponding fixed points of the polarity induced by the ∥-relation. Properties of such pairs are examined and in particular their relation to (pre)factorisation systems is analysed. The main theorems characterise:
This suggests a generalisation of the pair (Concordant, Dissonant) of classes of continuous maps which was shown by Collins to yield the factorisation system (Concordant quotient, Dissonant) on Top.
- (a)
factorisation systems which factor morphisms through a regular epimorphic “connected” morphism followed by a “disconnected” morphism, and
- (b)
pairs \(({\mathcal F},{\mathcal G})\) consisting of “connected” versus “disconnected” morphisms which induce a (regular) factorisation system.
Keywords
Concordant Dissonant Connected Disconnected Torsion Torsion free Factorisation systemMathematics Subject Classifications (2000)
18A20 18A32 18B30 54C10 54D05Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- 1.Adámek, J, Herrlich, H., Strecker, G.: Abstract and Concrete Categories. Wiley, New York (1990)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 2.Arhangel′skiĭ, A.V., Wiegandt, R.: Connectednesses and disconnectednesses in topology. Gen. Topol. Appl. 5, 9–33 (1975)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 3.Börger, R., Tholen, W.: Concordant-dissonant and monotone-light. In: Categorical Topology (Toledo, Ohio, 1983). Sigma Ser. Pure Math., vol. 5, pp. 90–107. Heldermann, Berlin (1984)Google Scholar
- 4.Boxall, G.: Generalising the concordant-dissonant factorisation. Master’s thesis, University of Cape Town (2005)Google Scholar
- 5.Carboni, A., Janelidze, G., Kelly, G., Paré, R.: On localization and stabilization for factorization systems. Appl. Categ. Struct. 5, 1–58 (1997)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 6.Castellini, G., Holgate, D.: A link between two connectedness notions. Appl. Categ. Struct. 11(5), 473–486 (2003)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 7.Clementino, M.M., Tholen, W.: Separation versus connectedness. Topol. its Appl. 75, 143–181 (1997)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 8.Clementino, M.M., Tholen, W.: Separated and connected maps. Appl. Categ. Struct. 6(3), 373–401 (1998)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 9.Collins, P.J.: Concordant mappings and the concordant-dissonant factorization of an arbitrary continuous function. Proc. Am. Math. Soc. 27, 587–591 (1971)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 10.Collins, P.J., Dyckhoff, R.: Connexion properties and factorisation theorems. In: Proceedings of the Second Symposium on Categorical Topology (Univ. Cape Town, Cape Town, 1976). Quaestiones Math., vol. 2, pp. 103–112. (1977/78)Google Scholar
- 11.Dickson, S.E.: A torsion theory for Abelian categories. Trans. Am. Math. Soc. 121, 223–235 (1966)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 12.Eilenberg, S.: Sur les transformations continues d’espaces métriques compacts. Fundam. Math. 22, 292–296 (1934)Google Scholar
- 13.Freyd, P.J., Kelly, G.M.: Categories of continuous functors, I. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 2, 169–191 (1972)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 14.Fried, E., Wiegandt, R.: Connectednesses and disconnectednesses of graphs. Algebra Univers. 5(3), 411–428 (1975)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 15.Herrlich, H.: Topologische Reflexionen und Coreflexionen. LNM, vol. 78. Springer, Verlag (1968)MATHGoogle Scholar
- 16.Herrlich, H., Salicrup, G., Vazquez, R.: Dispersed factorization structures. Can. J. Math. 31(5), 1059–1071 (1979)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 17.Janelidze, G., Tholen, W.: Functorial factorization, well-pointedness and separability. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 142(2), 99–130 (1999)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 18.Preuß, G.: Über den E-zusammenhang und seine Lokalisation. Ph.D. thesis, Freie Universität, Berlin (1967)Google Scholar
- 19.Preuß, G.: E̱-zusammenhängende Räume. Manuscr. Math. 3, 331–342 (1970)MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- 20.Preuß, G.: Trennung und Zusammenhang. Monatsh. Math. 74, 70–87 (1970)MATHCrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 21.Preuss, G.: Connection properties in topological categories and related topics. In: Categorical Topology (Proc. Internat. Conf., Free Univ. Berlin, Berlin, 1978). Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 719, pp. 293–307. Springer, Berlin (1979)Google Scholar
- 22.Salicrup, G., Vázquez, R.: Connection and disconnection. In: Categorical Topology (Proc. Internat. Conf., Free Univ. Berlin, Berlin, 1978). Lecture Notes in Math., vol. 719, pp. 326–344. Springer, Berlin (1979)Google Scholar
- 23.Strecker, G.E.: Component properties and factorizations. In: Topological Structures (Proc. Sympos. in Honour of Johannes de Groot (1914–1972), Amsterdam, 1973), pp. 123–140. Math. Centre Tracts, No. 52. Math. Centrum, Amsterdam (1974)Google Scholar
- 24.Tiller, J.A.: Component subcategories. Quaest. Math. 4(1), 19–40 (1980/81)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
- 25.Whyburn, G.T.: Non-alternating transformations. Am. J. Math. 56, 294–302 (1934)CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
Copyright information
© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2009