Combining Biofeedback with Stress Management Interventions: A Systematic Review of Physiological and Psychological Effects
Current mental healthcare systems experience difficulties meeting the challenges of a growing population with elevated stress symptoms. Outpatient stress management interventions have already proven to be effective in routine care and recent technological advances now allow to expand such interventions, for example by adding a physiological component like biofeedback. Adding biofeedback to stress management interventions appears promising, but there is a lack of insight into the general conceptualization and evaluation of the resulting interventions, both in relation to psychological and physiological stress indicators. A comprehensive literature search was performed to investigate stress management interventions with a biofeedback component. This systematic review provides an overview of these interventions and explores to what extent they can improve both physiological and psychological indicators of stress. Fourteen RCTs were included. A large diversity was observed in intervention design and effectiveness. Nevertheless, there is preliminary evidence that the use of biofeedback can improve both physiological and psychological indicators of stress. Biofeedback could provide an accessible and low-cost addition to stress interventions. Further research into the effectiveness of different components of biofeedback interventions is needed.
KeywordsBiofeedback Stress reduction mHealth Effectiveness Heart rate variability
This work was written within the Carewear project, funded by a VLAIO TETRA grant (Grants IWT.150614 and HBC.2016.0099).
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- American Psychiatric Association. (2016). Stress in America: the impact of discrimination. Stress in America™ Survey.Google Scholar
- American Psychological Association. (2017). Stress in America: The State of Our Nation. Stress in America™ Survey.Google Scholar
- Berry, M. E., Chapple, I. T., Ginsberg, J. P., Gleichauf, K. J., Meyer, J. A., & Nagpal, M. L. (2014). Non-pharmacological Intervention for chronic pain in veterans: A pilot study of heart rate variability biofeedback. Global Advances in Health and Medicine, 3(2), 28–33. https://doi.org/10.7453/gahmj.2013.075.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- De Witte, N. A. J., Bonroy, B., Debard, G., Sels, R., & Van Daele, T. (2018). Carewear: An internet-based platform to implement wearable technology in mental health care. Paper presented at the conferene of the European Society for Research on Internet Interventions, Dublin.Google Scholar
- Gaggioli, A., Cipresso, P., Serino, S., Campanaro, D. M., Pallavicini, F., Wiederhold, B. K., & Riva, G. (2014). Positive technology: A free mobile platform for the self-management of psychological stress. Studies in Health Technology and Informatics, 199, 25–29.Google Scholar
- Hallman, D. M., Olsson, E. M., von Schéele, B., Melin, L., & Lyskov, E. (2011). Effects of heart rate variability biofeedback in subjects with stress-related chronic neck pain: A pilot study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 36(2), 71–80. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-011-9147-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lemaire, J. B., Wallace, J. E., Lewin, A. M., de Grood, J., & Schaefer, J. P. (2011). The effect of a biofeedback-based stress management tool on physician stress: A randomized controlled clinical trial. Open Medicine, 5(4), e154–e163.Google Scholar
- Lin, H., Lin, H., Lin, W., & Huang, A. (2011). Effects of stress, depression, and their interaction on heart rate, skin conductance, finger temperature, and respiratory rate: Sympathetic-parasympathetic hypothesis of stress and depression. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 67(10), 1080–1091. https://doi.org/10.1002/jclp.20833.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lovibond, S. H., & Lovibond, P. F. (1995). Manual for the depression anxiety stress scales, 2nd ed. Sydney: Psychology Foundation.Google Scholar
- Mackay, A. M., Buckingham, R., Schwartz, R. S., Hodgkinson, S., Beran, R. G., & Cordato, D. J. (2015). The effect of biofeedback as a psychological intervention in multiple sclerosis: A randomized controlled study. International Journal of MS Care, 17(3), 101–108. https://doi.org/10.7224/1537-2073.2014-006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Munos, B., Baker, P. C., Bot, B. M., Crouthamel, M., de Vries, G., Ferguson, I., … Wang, P. (2016). Mobile health: The power of wearables, sensors, and apps to transform clinical trials. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1375(1), 3–18. https://doi.org/10.1111/nyas.13117.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Nolan, R. P., Kamath, M. V., Floras, J. S., Stanley, J., Pang, C., Picton, P., & Young, Q. R. (2005). Heart rate variability biofeedback as a behavioral neurocardiac intervention to enhance vagal heart rate control. American Heart Journal, 149(6), 1137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ahj.2005.03.015.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Siepmann, M., Hennig, U. D., Siepmann, T., Nitzsche, K., Mück-Weymann, M., Petrowski, K., & Weidner, K. (2014). The effects of heart rate variability biofeedback in patients with preterm labour. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 39(1), 27–35. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-013-9238-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Teufel, M., Stephan, K., Kowalski, A., Käsberger, S., Enck, P., Zipfel, S., & Giel, K. E. (2013). Impact of biofeedback on self-efficacy and stress reduction in obesity: A randomized controlled pilot study. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 38(3), 177–184. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-013-9223-8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Uddin, A. A., Morita, P. P., Tallevi, K., Armour, K., Li, J., Nolan, R. P., & Cafazzo, J. A. (2016). Development of a wearable cardiac monitoring system for behavioral neurocardiac training: A usability study. JMIR mHealth uHealth, 4(2), e45. https://doi.org/10.2196/mhealth.5288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Williams, A. D. (2016). Harnessing the quantified self-movement for optimal mental health and wellbeing. Paper presented at the LTA, Amsterdam.Google Scholar