No Effects of Successful Bidirectional SMR Feedback Training on Objective and Subjective Sleep in Healthy Subjects
There is a growing interest in the application of psychophysiological signals in more applied settings. Unidirectional sensory motor rhythm-training (SMR) has demonstrated consistent effects on sleep. In this study the main aim was to analyze to what extent participants could gain voluntary control over sleep-related parameters and secondarily to assess possible influences of this training on sleep metrics. Bidirectional training of SMR as well as heart rate variability (HRV) was used to assess the feasibility of training these parameters as possible brain computer interfaces (BCI) signals, and assess effects normally associated with unidirectional SMR training such as the influence on objective and subjective sleep parameters. Participants (n = 26) received between 11 and 21 training sessions during 7 weeks in which they received feedback on their personalized threshold for either SMR or HRV activity, for both up- and down regulation. During a pre- and post-test a sleep log was kept and participants used a wrist actigraph. Participants were asked to take an afternoon nap on the first day at the testing facility. During napping, sleep spindles were assessed as well as self-reported sleep measures of the nap. Although the training demonstrated successful learning to increase and decrease SMR and HRV activity, no effects were found of bidirectional training on sleep spindles, actigraphy, sleep diaries, and self-reported sleep quality. As such it is concluded that bidirectional SMR and HRV training can be safely used as a BCI and participants were able to improve their control over physiological signals with bidirectional training, whereas the application of bidirectional SMR and HRV training did not lead to significant changes of sleep quality in this healthy population.
KeywordsSleep Military BCI Biofeedback Neurofeedback Training Heart rate variability
Compliance with Ethical Standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
- Bianchi, G., & Sorrentino, R. (2007). Electronic filter simulation & design. New York: McGraw-Hill Professional, pp. 17–20.Google Scholar
- Cortoos, A., De Valck, E., Arns, M., Breteler, M. H., & Cluydts, R. (2010). An exploratory study on the effects of tele-neurofeedback and tele-biofeedback on objective and subjective sleep in patients with primary insomnia. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 35, 125–134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Del Pozo, J. M., Gevirtz, R. N., Scher, B., & Guarneria, E. (2004). Biofeedback treatment increases heart rate variability in patients with known coronary artery disease. American Heart Journal, 147, G1-G6.Google Scholar
- Hammond, D. C. (2007). Neurofeedback for the enhancement of athletic performance and physical balance. The Journal of the American Board of Sport Psychology, 1, 1–9.Google Scholar
- Hassett, A. L., Radvanski, D. C., Vaschillo, E. G., Vaschillo, B., Sigal, L. H., & Karavidas, M. K. (2007). A pilot study of heart rate variability (HRV) biofeedback in patients with fibromyalgia. Applied Psychophysiology and Biofeedback, 32, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10484-006-9028-0.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Hoddes, E., Zarcone, V., Smythe, H., Philips, R., & Dement, W. C. (1973). Quantification of sleepiness: A new approach. Psychophysiology, 10, 431–436. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-8986.1973.tb00801.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kerkhof, G. A., Brouwer, A., Rijsman, R. M., Schimsheimer, R. J., & van Kasteel, V. (2013). Holland sleep disorders questionnaire: A new sleep disorders questionnaire based on the international classification of sleep disorders-2. Journal of Sleep Research, 22, 104–107. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2869.2012.01041.x.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Kinnear, P. R., & Gray, C. D. (2000). SPSS for Windows made simple. Hove: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
- Kleinnijenhuis, M., Arns, M. W., Spronk, D. B., Breteler, M. H. M., & Duysens, J. E. J. (2008). Comparison of discrete-trial based SMR and SCP training and the interrelationship between SCP and SMR networks: Implications for brain-computer interfaces and neurofeedback. Journal of Neurotherapy, 11, 19–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Lehrer, P. M., Vaschillo, E., Vaschillo, B., Lu, S. E., Eckberg, D. L., Edelberg, R., Shih, W. J., Lin, Y., Kuusela, T. A., Tahvanainen, K. U., & Hamer, R. M. (2003). Heart rate variability biofeedback increases baroreflex gain and peak expiratory flow. Psychosomatic Medicine, 65, 796–805.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Mulder-Hajonides van der Meulen W. R. E. H., Wijnberg, J. R., Hollanders, J. J., DeDiana, I., & Hoofdakker, R. (1980). Measurement of subjective sleep quality. Fifth European Congress on Sleep Research, Amsterdam.Google Scholar
- Ruehland, W. R., O’Donoghue, F. J., Pierce, R. J., Thornton, A. T., Singh, P., Copland, J. M., Stevens, B., & Rochford, P. D. (2011). The 2007 AASM recommendations for EEG electrode placement in polysomnography: Impact on sleep and cortical arousal scoring. Sleep, 1, 34, 73–81.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schabus, M., Heib, D. P. J., Lechinger, J., Griessenberger, H., Klimesch, W., Pawlizki, A., Kunz, A. B., Sterman, B. M., & Hoedlmoser, K. (2014). Enhancing sleep quality and memory in insomnia using instrumental sensorimotor rhythm conditioning. Biological Psychology, 95, 126–134.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Zucker, T. L., Samuelson, K. W., Muench, F., Greenberg, M. A., & Gevirtz, R. N. (2009). The effects of respiratory sinus arrhythmia biofeedback on heart rate variability and posttraumatic stress disorder symptoms: A pilot study. Applied Psychophysiology & Biofeedback, 34, 135–143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar