Effects of Incomplete Information on the Detection of Concealed Crime Details
- 155 Downloads
The accuracy of the Concealed Information Test in correct classification of informed guilty and informed innocent participants was assessed when the explicitness of the obtained information varied. For these purposes, a mock crime procedure was employed and participants were randomly assigned to six conditions formed by combinations of two levels of the state of guilt (guilty and innocent) and three levels of information completeness (exact, indicative, non-specific). As expected, informed guilty participants were more accurately detected than informed innocents. It was further found that when the gathered information was less explicit, detection efficiency decreased. Theoretical and practical implications of the present results are discussed.
KeywordsGuilty knowledge test Concealed information test Polygraph Psychophysiological detection of information Information processing
This research was supported by a grant from the Israel Science Foundation (ISF) Grant no. 257/06.
- Ben-Shakhar, G., & Furedy, J. J. (1990). Theories and applications in the detection of deception. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. E. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Fukumoto, J. (1980). Psychophysiological detection of deception in Japan: The past and the present. Polygraph, 11, 234–238.Google Scholar
- Konieczny, J. (2007). An attempt to falsify the results of a polygraph test through the implementation of false memory: A case study. European Polygraph, 1, 117–121.Google Scholar
- Lykken, D. T. (1974). Psychology and the lie detection industry. American Psychologist, 29, 225–239.Google Scholar
- Lykken, D. T. (1998). A Tremor in the blood. Uses and abuses of the lie detector (2nd ed.). New York: Plenum Trade.Google Scholar
- Nakayama, M. (2002). Practical use of the concealed information test for criminal investigation in Japan. In M. Kleiner (Ed.), Handbook of polygraph testing (pp. 49–86). San Diego: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- National Research Council. (2003). The polygraph and lie detection, committee to review the scientific evidence on the polygraph. Washington, DC: Division of Behavioral and Social Sciences and Education. The National Academies Press.Google Scholar
- Podlesny, J. A. (1993). Is the guilty knowledge polygraph technique applicable in criminal investigations? A review of FBI case records. Crime Laboratory Digest, 20, 57–61.Google Scholar
- Vossel, G., Gamer, M., Godert, H. W., & Rill, H. G. (2003). The efficiency of detecting concealed information with the guilty knowledge test: A comparison of different physiological variables and non-physiological methods of credibility assessment using signal detection theory. Journal of Psychophysiologt, 17, 184. [Abstract].Google Scholar
- Zvi L., Nachson, I., & Elaad, E. (2010). Effects of coping and cooperative behavior of guilty and informed innocent participants on the detection of concealed information. Paper presented at the 20th conference of the European association of psychology and law, Gothenburg, Sweden, June 15–18.Google Scholar