Moderating Laboratory Adaptation with the Use of a Heart-rate Variability Biofeedback Device (StressEraser®)
- 313 Downloads
Difficulty sleeping is a common problem with laboratory polysomnograms. This affects both polysomnograms that are used as a clinical tool to investigate sleep pathology or as an outcome variable in research. The goal of this study was to use a handheld biofeedback device (StressEraser®) to improve sleep quality in the laboratory. Ten subjects without a history of sleep disorders were randomly assigned to either a StressEraser® or no-treatment control condition. A sleep disturbance scale derived from sleep efficiency, REM latency, minutes of stage 1 sleep, and wake after sleep onset was created to evaluate the differences between these groups. Subjects in the StressEraser® group had significantly lower scores on the sleep disturbance scale compared to the no-treatment control group (p = 0.003). Sleep latency was not improved. In conclusion, the StressEraser® significantly improved sleep quality compared to a no-treatment control group. This suggests that the StressEraser® may be an effective tool to help reduce the first-night effect in nighttime laboratory sleep studies.
KeywordsTransient insomnia StressEraser® Biofeedback Heart-rate variability First-night effect
This study was supported by a grant from Helicor Inc., maker of the StressEraser®.
- Hartmann, E. (1968). Adaptation to the sleep laboratory and placebo effect. Psychophysiology, 4(3), 389.Google Scholar
- Iber, C., Ancoli-Israel, S., Chesson, A. L., Jr., & Quan, S. F. (2007). AASM manual for the scoring of sleep and associated events. Westchester, IL: AASM.Google Scholar
- Sheehan, D. V., Lecrubier, Y., Sheehan, K. H., Amorim, P., Janavs, J., Weiller, E., et al. (1998). The mini-international neuropsychiatric interview (M.I.N.I.): The development and validation of a structured diagnostic psychiatric interview for DSM-IV and ICD-10. Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 59(Suppl 20), 22–33. quiz 34–57.PubMedGoogle Scholar