Advertisement

Efficacy of Traumatic Brain Injury Rehabilitation: Interventions of QEEG-guided Biofeedback, Computers, Strategies, and Medications

  • Kirtley E. ThorntonEmail author
  • Dennis P. Carmody
Article

Abstract

The onset of cognitive rehabilitation brought with it a hope for an effective treatment for the traumatic brain injured subject. This paper reviews the empirical reports of changes in cognitive functioning after treatment and compares the relative effectiveness of several treatments including computer interventions, cognitive strategies, EEG biofeedback, and medications. The cognitive functions that are reviewed include auditory memory, attention and problem solving. The significance of the change in cognitive function is assessed in two ways that include effect size and longevity of effect. These analyses complement the previously published meta-reviews by adding these two criteria and include reports of EEG biofeedback, which is shown to be an effective intervention for auditory memory.

Keywords

EEG biofeedback Traumatic brain injury Cognitive rehabilitation Neurocognitive rehabilitation QEEG Activation QEEG Memory rehabilitation 

References

  1. Ashley, M. J., Krych, D. K., & Lehr, R. P. (1990). Cost/Benefit analysis for post-acute rehabilitation of the traumatically brain-injured patient. Journal of Insurance Information, 22(2), 156–161.Google Scholar
  2. Ashwal, S., Holshouser, B. A., & Tong, K. A. (2006). Use of advanced neuroimaging techniques in the evaluation of pediatric traumatic brain injury. Developmental Neuroscience, 28, 309–326. doi: 10.1159/000094157.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Babikian, T., Freier, M. C., Ashwal, S., Riggs, M. L., Burley, T., & Holshouser, B. A. (2006). MR spectroscopy: Predicting long-term neuropsychological outcome following pediatric TBI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging, 24(4), 801–811. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20696.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Belanger, H. G., Vanderploeg, R. D., Curtiss, G., & Warden, D. L. (2007). Recent neuroimaging techniques in mild traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 19(1), 5–20. doi: 10.1176/appi.neuropsych.19.1.5.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Benedict, R. H. B. (1989). The effectiveness of cognitive remediation strategies for victims of traumatic head injury: A review of the literature. Clinical Psychology Review, 9, 605–626. doi: 10.1016/0272-7358(89)90014-7.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cappa, S. F., Benke, T., Clarke, S., Rossi, B., Stemmer, B., & van Heugten, C. M. (2003). EFNS guidelines on cognitive rehabilitation: Report of an EFNS task force. European Journal of Neurology, 10(1), 11–23. doi: 10.1046/j.1468-1331.2003.00537.x.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaytor, N., & Schmitter-Edgecombe, M. (2003). The ecological validity of neuropsychological tests: A review of the literature on everyday cognitive skills. Neuropsychology Review, 13(4), 181–197. doi: 10.1023/B:NERV.0000009483.91468.fb.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cherek, L., & Taylor, M. (1995). Rehabilitation, case management, and functional outcome: An insurance industry perspective. Neuro Rehabilitation, 5(1), 87–95. doi: 10.1016/1053-8135(94)00107-6.Google Scholar
  9. Chestnut, R. M., Carney, N., Maynard, H., Patterson, P., Mann, N.·C., & Helfand, M. (1998). Evidence report on rehabilitation of persons with traumatic brain injury. Evidence report no. 2 (Contract 290-97-0018 to Oregon Health Sciences University). Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy and Research.Google Scholar
  10. Christensen, A. L. (1975). Luria’s Neuropsychological Investigation, Copenhagen, MurksgaardGoogle Scholar
  11. Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Kalmar, K., Langenbahn, D. M., Malec, J. F., Bergquist, T. F., et al. (2000). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Recommendations for clinical practice. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 81(12), 1596–1615. doi: 10.1053/apmr.2000.19240.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Malec, J. F., Langenbahn, D. M., Felicetti, T., Kneipp, S., et al. (2005). Evidence-based cognitive rehabilitation: Updated review of the literature from 1998 through 2002. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 86, 1681–1692. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2005.03.024.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cicerone, K. D., Smith, L. C., Ellmo, W., Mangel, H. R., Nelson, P., Chase, R. F., et al. (1996). Neuropsychological rehabilitation of mild traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury: [B1], 10(4), 277–286. doi: 10.1080/026990596124458.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coe, R. (2000). What is an ‘effect size’? A guide for users: Curriculum. Evaluation and Management Centre: Durham University.Google Scholar
  15. Cohen, J. (1969). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  16. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd edition ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  17. Delis, D. C., Kramer, J. H., Kaplan, E., & Ober, B. A. (1987). California Verbal Learning Test (Research Edition ed.). San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  18. Fabiano, R. J., & Crewe, N. (1995). Variables associated with employment following severe traumatic brain injury. Rehabilitation Psychology, 40, 223–231. doi: 10.1037/0090-5550.40.3.223.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Fann, J. R., Uomoto, J. M., & Katon, W. J. (2001). Cognitive improvement with treatment of depression following mild traumatic brain injury. Psychosomatics, 42(1), 48–54. doi: 10.1176/appi.psy.42.1.48.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Fasotti, L., Kovacs, F., Eling, P. A. T. M., & Brouwer, W. H. (2000). Time pressure management as a compensatory strategy training after closed head injury. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 10, 47–65. doi: 10.1080/096020100389291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Freeman, M. R., Mittenberg, W., Dicowden, M., & Bat-Ami, M. (1992). Executive and compensatory memory retraining in traumatic brain injury. Brain Injury: [BI], 6(1), 65–70. doi: 10.3109/02699059209008124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gavett, B. E., O’Bryant, S. E., Fisher, J. M., & McCaffrey, R. J. (2005). Hit rates of adequate performance based on the test of memory malingering (TOMM) Trial 1. Applied Neuropsychology, 12(1), 1–4. doi: 10.1207/s15324826an1201_1.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Glass, G. V., McGaw, B., & Smith, M. L. (1981). Meta-analysis in social research. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  24. Glisky, E. L., & Schacter, D. (1986). Remediation of organic memory disorders: Current status and future prospects. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 1(3), 54–63. doi: 10.1097/00001199-198609000-00009.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Gray, J., & Robertson, I. (1992). Microcomputer based attentional retraining after brain damage: A randomized group controlled study. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 2, 97–155. doi: 10.1080/09602019208401399.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gronwall, D. M. A. (1977). Paced auditory serial-addition task: A measure of recovery from concussion. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 44, 367–373.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Hammond, C., Walker, J., Hoffman, D., Lubar, J., Trudeau, D., Gurnee, R., et al. (2004). Standards for the use of quantitative electroencephalography (QEEG) in neurofeedback: A position paper of the International Society for Neuronal Regulation. Journal of Neurotherapy, 8(1), 5–29. doi: 10.1300/J184v08n01_02.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harley, J. P., Allen, C., Braciszewksi, T. L., Cicerone, K. D., Dahlberg, C., Evans, S., et al. (1992). Guidelines for cognitive rehabilitation. Neuro Rehabilitation, 2, 62–67.Google Scholar
  29. Hedges, L. V. (1981). Distributional theory for Glass’s estimator of effect size and related estimators. Journal of Educational Statistics, 6, 107–128. doi: 10.2307/1164588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  31. Hoffman, D. A., Lubar, F. J., Thatcher, R. W., Sterman, M. B., Rosenfeld, P. J., Striefel, S., et al. (1999). Limitation of the American Academy of neurology and American clinical neurophysiology society paper on QEEG. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 11(3), 401–407.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  32. Hughes, J. R., & John, E. R. (1999). Conventional and quantitative electroencephalography in psychiatry. The Journal of Neuropsychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 11(2), 190–208.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. IVA. (1995). Brain train. Richmond, VA: Brain Train.Google Scholar
  34. Kaschel, R., Della Sala, S., Cantagallo, A., Fahlbock, A., Laaksonen, R., & Kazan, M. (2002). Imagery mnemonics for the rehabilitation of memory: A randomised group controlled trial. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 12, 127–153. doi: 10.1080/09602010143000211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Keller, I. (2001). Neurofeedback therapy of attention deficits in patients with traumatic brain injury. Journal of Neurotherapy, 5, 19–33. doi: 10.1300/J184v05n01_03.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kerner, M. J., & Acker, M. (1985). Computer delivery of memory retraining with head injured patients. Cognitive Rehabilitation, 26–31.Google Scholar
  37. Laatsch, L., & Stress, M. (2000). Neuropsychological change following individualized cognitive rehabilitation therapy. Neuro Rehabilitation, 15(3), 189–197.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. León-Carrión, J., Dominguez-Roldán, J. M., Murillo-Cabezas, F., o Dominguez-Morales, M., & Muñoz-Sanchez, M. A. (2000). The role of citicholine in neuropsychological training after traumatic brain injury. Neuro Rehabilitation, 14(1), 33–40.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Levine, B., Cabeza, R., McIntosh, A. R., Black, S. E., Grady, C. L., & Stuss, D. T. (2002). Functional reorganization of memory after traumatic brain injury: A study with H2150 positron emission tomography. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery and Psychiatry, 73(2), 173–181. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.73.2.173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lubar, J. O., & Lubar, J. F. (1984). Electroencephalographic biofeedback of SMR and beta for treatment of attention deficit disorders in a clinical setting. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 9(1), 1–23. doi: 10.1007/BF00998842.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lubar, J. F., Swartwood, M. O., Swartwood, J. N., & O’Donnell, P. H. (1995). Evaluation of the effectiveness of EEG neurofeedback training for ADHD in a clinical setting as measured by changes in T.O.V.A. scores, behavioral ratings, and WISC-R performance. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 20(1), 83–99. doi: 10.1007/BF01712768.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Marker, T. (1996). COGPACK. Ladenburg, Germany: Programmpaket fur neuropsychologicschen rehabilitation.Google Scholar
  43. McAllister, T. W., Sparling, M. B., Flashman, L. A., & Saykin, A. J. (2001). Neuroimaging findings in mild traumatic brain injury. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 23(6), 775–791.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. McDowell, S., Whyte, J., & D’Esposito, M. (1998). Differential effect of a dopaminergic agonist on prefrontal function in traumatic brain injury patients. Brain, 121(Pt 6), 1155–1164. doi: 10.1093/brain/121.6.1155.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. McKinlay, W. W. (1992). Achieving generalization of memory training. Brain Injury: [BI], 6(2), 107–108. doi: 10.3109/02699059209029649.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Milders, M., Deelman, B., & Berg, I. (1998). Rehabilitation of memory for people’s names. Memory (Hove, England), 6(1), 21–36. doi: 10.1080/741941597.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Moldover, J. E., Goldberg, K. B., & Prout, M. F. (2004). Depression after traumatic brain injury: A review of evidence for clinical heterogeneity. Neuropsychology Review, 14(3), 143–153. doi: 10.1023/B:NERV.0000048181.46159.61.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. NAN. (2002). Cognitive rehabilitation, official position of the national academy of neuropsychology. Retrieved April 15, 2007 from http://nanonline.org/downloads/paio/Position/NANPositionCogRehab.pdf.
  49. Napolitano, E., Elovic, E. P., & Qureshi, A. I. (2005). Pharmacological stimulant treatment of neurocognitive and functional deficits after traumatic and non-traumatic brain injury. Medical Science Monitor, 11(6), RA212–RA220.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. Niemann, H., Ruff, R. M., & Baser, C. A. (1990). Computer-assisted attention retraining in head-injured individuals: A controlled efficacy study of an outpatient program. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 38(6), 811–817.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Nuwer, M. (1997). Assessment of digital EEG, quantitative EEG, and EEG brain mapping. Neurology, 49, 277–292.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  52. Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2000). Measures of effect size for comparative studies: Applications, interpretations and limitations. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 241–286. doi: 10.1006/ceps.2000.1040.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Othmer, S., & Othmer, S.·F. (1992). EEG biofeedback training for hyperactivity, attention deficit disorder, specific learning disability, and other disorders. EEG Spectrum, 16100 Ventura Blvd., Ste 100, Encino, Ca.Google Scholar
  54. Park, N. W., Proulx, G. B., & Towers, W. M. (1999). Evaluation of the attention process training programme. Neuropsychological Rehabilitation, 9(2), 135–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Plenger, P. M., Dixon, C. E., Castillo, R. M., Frankowski, R. F., Yablon, S. A., & Levin, H. S. (1996). Subacute methylphenidate treatment for moderate to moderately severe traumatic brain injury: A preliminary double-blind placebo-controlled study. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 77(6), 536–540. doi: 10.1016/S0003-9993(96)90291-9.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Quemada, J. I., Munoz Cespedes, J. M., Ezkerra, J., Ballesteros, J., Ibarra, N., & Urruticoechea, I. (2003). Outcome of memory rehabilitation in traumatic brain injury assessed by neuropsychological tests and questionnaires. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 18(6), 532–540.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Reitan, R. M., & Wolfson, D. (1993). The Halstead-Reitan neuropsychological test battery: Theory and clinical interpretation (2nd ed.). South Tucson, AZ: Neuropsychology Press.Google Scholar
  58. Rey, A. (1941). Psychological examination of traumatic encephalopathy. Archieves de Psychologic, 28, 286–340. Sections translated by J. Corwin & F.·W. Bylsma. (1993). The Clinical Neuropsychologist, 4–9.Google Scholar
  59. Ricker, J. H. (1998). Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: Is it worth the cost? Applied Neuropsychology, 5(4), 184–193. doi: 10.1207/s15324826an0504_3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Ruff, R., Mahaffey, R., Engel, J., Farrow, C., Cox, D., & Karzmark, P. (1994). Efficacy study of THINKable in the attention and memory retraining of traumatically head-injured patients. Brain Injury: [BI], 8(1), 3–14.Google Scholar
  61. Ryan, T. V., & Ruff, R. M. (1988). The efficacy of structured memory retraining in a group comparison of head trauma patients. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 3(2), 165–179. doi: 10.1016/0887-6177(88)90061-3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Salazar, A. M., Zitnay, G. A., Warden, D. L., & Schwab, K. A. (2000). Defense and veterans head injury program: Background and overview. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15(5), 1081–1091.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Schmitter-Edgecombe, M., Fahy, J., Whelan, J., & Long, C. (1995). Memory remediation after severe closed head injury. Notebook training versus supportive therapy. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 63, 484–489. doi: 10.1037/0022-006X.63.3.484.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Schoenberger, N. E., Shif, S. C., Esty, M. L., Ochs, L., & Matheis, R. J. (2001). Flexyx neurotherapy system in the treatment of traumatic brain injury: An initial evaluation. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 16(3), 260–274. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200106000-00005.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Siegmund, K. (1999). Neurosoft: Ein integriertes therapliesystem. Germany: Burladingen.Google Scholar
  66. Stephens, J. (2006). The effectiveness of EEG biofeedback and cognitive rehabilitation as treatments for moderate to severe traumatic brain injury. Victoria University.Google Scholar
  67. Stroop, J. R. (1935). Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 18, 643–662. doi: 10.1037/h0054651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Tansey, M. (1991). Wechsler (WISC-R) changes following treatment of learning disabilities via EEG biofeedback training in a private practice setting. Australian Journal of Psychology, 43, 147–153. doi: 10.1080/00049539108260139.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Tansey, M. A. (1993). Ten-year stability of EEG biofeedback results for a hyperactive boy who failed fourth grade perceptually impaired class. Biofeedback and Self-Regulation, 18(1), 33–44. doi: 10.1007/BF00999512.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Thatcher, R. W. (2000). EEG operant conditioning (biofeedback) and traumatic brain injury. Clinical EEG (Electroencephalography), 31(1), 38–44.Google Scholar
  71. Thatcher, R. W., Moore, N., John, E. R., Duffy, F., Hughes, J., & Krieger, M. (1999). QEEG and traumatic brain injury: Rebuttal of the American Academy of Neurology 1997 Report by the EEG and Clinical Neuroscience Society. Clinical EEG, 30(3), 94–98.Google Scholar
  72. Thatcher, R. W., Walker, R. A., Gerson, I., & Geisler, F. (1989). EEG Discriminate analysis of mild head trauma. EEG and Clinical Neurophysiology, 73, 93–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thornton, K. E. (2000). Rehabilitation of memory functioning in brain injured subjects with EEG biofeedback. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 15(6), 1285–1296. doi: 10.1097/00001199-200012000-00008.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Thornton, K. (2001). Patent # 6309361 B1. Method for improving memory by identifying and using QEEG parameters correlated to specific cognitive functioning. Issued 10-30-2001.Google Scholar
  75. Thornton, K. E. (2002). Electrophysiology of the reasons the brain damaged subject can’t recall what they hear. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 17, 1–17. doi: 10.1016/S0887-6177(00)00073-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Thornton, K. E., & Carmody, D. P. (2005). Electroencephalogram biofeedback for reading disability and traumatic brain injury. Child and Adolescent Psychiatric Clinics of North America, 14(1), 137–162. doi: 10.1016/j.chc.2004.07.001.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Thornton, K. E., & Carmody, D. P.(2007). Traumatic brain injury rehabilitation: QEEG biofeedback treatment protocols. Technical Report, 2007 (1), Brain Foundation, S. Plainfield, NJ, 07080Google Scholar
  78. Thornton, K. E., & Carmody, D. P. Eyes-closed and activation databases in predicting cognitive effectiveness. Journal of Neurotherapy (in press).Google Scholar
  79. Tinius, T. P., & Tinius, K. A. (2000). Changes after EEG biofeedback and cognitive retraining in adults with mild traumatic brain injury and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. Journal of Neurotherapy, 4(2), 27–44. doi: 10.1300/J184v04n02_05.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. TOVA. (1992). Test of Variables of Attention. Los Alamitos, CA: The TOVA Company.Google Scholar
  81. Wallesch, C. W., Curio, N., Galazky, I., Jost, S., & Synowitz, H. (2001). The Neuropsychology of blunt head injury in the early post acute stage: Effects of focal lesions and diffuse axonal injury. Journal of Neurotrauma, 18(1), 11–20. doi: 10.1089/089771501750055730.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Wechsler, D. (1945). A standardized memory scale for clinical use. The Journal of Psychology, 19, 87–95.Google Scholar
  83. Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. (1955). Wechsler Adult Intelligence Scale. San Antonio, TX: Harcourt Assessment, Inc.Google Scholar
  84. Wehman, P., Kreutzer, J., Sale, P., West, M., Morton, M., & Diambra, J. (1989). Cognitive impairment and remediation: Implications for employment following traumatic brain injury. The Journal of Head Trauma Rehabilitation, 4(3), 66–75.Google Scholar
  85. Whyte, J., Hart, T., Vaccaro, M., Grieb-Neff, P., Risser, A., Polansky, M., et al. (2004). Effects of methylphenidate on attention deficits after traumatic brain injury: A multidimensional, randomized, controlled trial. American Journal of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 83(6), 401–420. doi: 10.1097/01.PHM.0000128789.75375.D3.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  86. Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. (1993). Wisconsin Card Sorting Test. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Brain FoundationSouth PlainfieldUSA
  2. 2.Institute for the Study of Child Development, Robert Wood Johnson Medical SchoolUniversity of Medicine and Dentistry of New JerseyNew BrunswickUSA

Personalised recommendations