Advertisement

Transversal effects of high order numerical schemes for compressible fluid flows

  • Xin Lei
  • Jiequan LiEmail author
Article
  • 12 Downloads

Abstract

Finite volume schemes for the two-dimensional (2D) wave system are taken to demonstrate the role of the genuine dimensionality of Lax-Wendroff flow solvers for compressible fluid flows. When the finite volume schemes are applied, the transversal variation relative to the computational cell interfaces is neglected, and only the normal numerical flux is used, thanks to the Gauss-Green formula. In order to offset such defects, the Lax-Wendroff flow solvers or the generalized Riemann problem (GRP) solvers are adopted by substituting the time evolution of flows into the spatial variation. The numerical results show that even with the same convergence rate, the error by the GRP2D solver is almost one ninth of that by the multistage Runge-Kutta (RK) method.

Key words

transversal effect generalized Riemann problem (GRP) solver Lax-Wendroff flow solver wave system 

Chinese Library Classification

O357.4 

2010 Mathematics Subject Classification

76D17 76E09 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. [1]
    ABGRALL, R. and SHU, C. W. Handbook of Numerical Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cam-bridge University Press, Cambridge (2016)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  2. [2]
    COLELLA, P. Multidimensional upwind methods for hyperbolic conservation laws. Journal of Computational Physics, 87, 171–200 (1990)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. [3]
    FEY, M. Multidimensional upwinding, I: the method of transport for solving the Euler equations. Journal of Computational Physics, 143, 159–180 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. [4]
    LUKÁČOVÁ-MEDVID’OVÁ, M., MORTON, K., and WARNECKE, G. Evolution Galerkin methods for hyperbolic systems in two space dimensions. Mathematics of Computation of the American Mathematical Society, 69, 1355–1384 (2000)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. [5]
    MANDAL, J. C. and DESPHANDE, S. M. Higher order accurate kinetic flux vector splitting method for Euler equations. Notes on Numerical Fluid Mechanics, Vieweg+Teubner Verlag, New York (1989)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. [6]
    MANDAL, J. C. and DESPHANDE, S. M. Kinetic flux vector splitting for Euler equations. Computers and Fluids, 23, 447–478 at(1994)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. [7]
    XU, K. A gas-kinetic BGK scheme for the Navier-Stokes equations and its connection with artificial dissipation and Godunov method. Journal of Computational Physics, 171, 289–335 (2001)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. [8]
    ROE, P. Multidimensional upwinding. Handbook of Numerical Analysis, Elsevier, Amsterdam (2017)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. [9]
    STRANG, G. On the construction and comparison of difference schemes. SIAM Journal on Nu-merical Analysis, 53, 506–517 (1998)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. [10]
    GOTTLIEB, S. and SHU, C. W. Total variation diminishing Runge-Kutta schemes. Mathematics of Computation, 67, 73–85 (1998)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  11. [11]
    WOODWARD, P. and COLELLA, P. The numerical simulation of two-dimensional fluid flow with strong shocks. Journal of Computational Physics, 54, 115–173 (1984)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. [12]
    JIANG, G. S. and SHU, C. W. Efficient implementation of weighted ENO schemes. Journal of Computational Physics, 126, 202–228 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. [13]
    BEN-ARTZI, M. and FALCOVITZ, J. Generalized Riemann Problems in Computational Fluid Dynamics, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2003)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. [14]
    VAN LEER, B. Towards the ultimate conservative difference scheme, V: a second-order sequel to Godunov’s method. Journal of Computational Physics, 32, 101–136 (1979)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. [15]
    FJORDHOLM, U. and MISHRA, S. Vorticity preserving finite volume schemes for the shallow water equations. SIAM Journal on Scientific Computing, 33, 588–611 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. [16]
    LI, J., LUKáčOVá-MEDVID’OVá, M., and WARCKE, G. Evolution Galerkin schemes applied to two-dimensional Riemann problems for the wave equation system. Discrete and Continuous Dynamical Systems-A, 9, 559–576 (2003)MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. [17]
    LEE, C. New features of CS solitons and the formation of vortices. Physics Letters A, 247, 397–402 (1998)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. [18]
    LEE, C. Possible universal transitional scenario in a flat plate boundary layer: measurement and visualization. Physics Letters E, 62, 3659–3671 (2000)Google Scholar
  19. [19]
    LEE, C. and FU, S. On the formation of the chain of ring-like vortices in a transitional boundary layer. Experiments in Fluids, 30, 354–357 (2003)CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. [20]
    LEE, C. and WU, J. Transition in wall-bounded flows. Applied Mechanics Reviews, 61, 030802 (2008)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  21. [21]
    ZHANG, Y. C. and LI, C. Transition control of Mach 6.5 hypersonic flat plate boundary layer. Applied Mathematics and Mechanics (English Edition), 40(2), 283–292 (2019) https://doi.org/ 10.1007/s10483-019-2423-8Google Scholar
  22. [22]
    CHEN, X., ZHU, Y., and LEE, C. Interactions between second mode and low-frequency waves in a hypersonic boundary layer. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 820, 693–735 (2017)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  23. [23]
    LEE, C., PENG, H., YUAN, H., WU, J., ZHOU, M., and HUSSAIN, F. Experimental studies of surface waves inside a cylindrical container. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 677, 39–62 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. [24]
    LEVEQUE, R. J. Finite Volume Methods for Hyperbolic Problems, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (2002)CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Shanghai University and Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Mathematical SciencesBeijing Normal UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Laboratory of Computational PhysicsInstitute of Applied Physics and Computational MathematicsBeijingChina
  3. 3.Center for Applied Physics and TechnologyPeking UniversityBeijingChina

Personalised recommendations