Numerical simulation of insect flight
- 87 Downloads
- 3 Citations
Abstract
In the non-inertial coordinates attached to the model wing, the two-dimensional unsteady flow field triggered by the motion of the model wing, similar to the flapping of the insect wings, was numerically simulated. One of the advantages of our method is that it has avoided the difficulty related to the moving-boundary problem. Another advantage is that the model has three degrees of freedom and can be used to simulate arbitrary motions of a two-dimensional wing in plane only if the motion is known. Such flexibility allows us to study how insects control their flying. Our results show that there are two parameters that are possibly utilized by insects to control their flight: the phase difference between the wing translation and rotation, and the lateral amplitude of flapping along the direction perpendicular to the average flapping plane.
Key words
insect flight numerical simulation phase differenceChinese Library Classification
O5312000 Mathematics Subject Classification
76Z99Preview
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
References
- [1]Wooton R J. Functional morphology of insect wings[J]. Annual Review of Entomology, 1992, 37:113–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [2]Dixon A F G, Kindlmann P. Cost of flight apparatus and optimum body size of aphid migrants[J]. Ecology, 1998, 80(5):1670–1690.Google Scholar
- [3]Marden J H. Maximum lift production during takeoff in flying animals[J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1987, 130:235–258.Google Scholar
- [4]Sun Mao. Unsteady lift mechanisms in insect flight[J]. Advances in Mechanics, 2002, 32(3):425–434.Google Scholar
- [5]Weis-Fogh T, Jensen M. Biology and physics of locust flight—II: basic principles in insect flight[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences, 1956, 239:553–584.Google Scholar
- [6]Dudley T. The Biomechanics of Insect Flight[M]. Princeton University Press, Princeton, 2000, 35–47.Google Scholar
- [7]Ellington C P. The aerodynamics of hovering insect flight—I: the quasi-steady analysis[J]. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society Biological Sciences, 1984, 305:1–15.Google Scholar
- [8]Weis-Fogh T. Quick estimates of flight fitness in hovering animals, including novel mechanisms for lift production[J]. Journal of Experimental Biology, 1973, 59:169–230.Google Scholar
- [9]Lighthill M J. The Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1973, 60(1):1–17.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
- [10]Edwards R H, Cheng H K. The separation vortex in the Weis-Fogh circulation-generation mechanism[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1982, 120(1):463–473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [11]Maxworthy T. Experiments on the Weis-Fogh mechanism of lift generation by insects in hovering flight—Part 1: dynamics of the claping and fling[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1979, 93(1):47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [12]Spedding G R, Maxworthy T. The generation of circulation and lift in a rigid two-dimensional fling[J]. Journal of Fluid Mechanics, 1986, 165:247–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [13]Ellington C P, Berg C V D, Willmott A P, Thomas A L R. Leading-edge vortices in insect flight[J]. Nature, 1996, 384:626–630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [14]Dickinson M H, Lehmann F O, Sane S P. Wing rotation and the aerodynamic basis of insect flight[J]. Science, 1999, 284(5422):1954–1960.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [15]Jane Wang Z. Two-dimensional mechanism for insect hovering[J]. Physical Review Letters, 2000, 85(10):2216–2219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- [16]Lan Shilong, Sun Mao. Aerodynamic properties of a wing performing unsteady rotational motions[J]. Acta Mechanica Sinica, 2001, 33(2):173–182.Google Scholar