Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 112, Issue 4, pp 615–632 | Cite as

Short-term impact of biochar amendments on eukaryotic communities in three different soils

  • Ibrahim S. AbujabhahEmail author
  • Richard B. Doyle
  • Sally A. Bound
  • John P. Bowman
Original Paper


This study determined the loading impacts of wood-based biochar on the eukaryotic community in three different soils (brown sandy loam—BSL, red loam—RL and a black clay loam—BCL) using a pot trial conducted over 10 months. Soil analysis and 18S rRNA gene sequencing performed using the Illumina MiSeq platform was carried out to evaluate the changes in eukaryotic community composition in relation to different added amounts of biochar. It was found that biochar addition had a negligible effect on diversity parameters in the brown sandy loam Kurosol (BSL) and red loam Dermosol (RL) soils. There were, however, significant changes in eukaryotic community composition of these biochar amended soils. These changes were most discernible in the lighter (low clay content) BSL soil for the fungal communities (F = 3.0106, p = 0.0003) present and also when total eukaryotes were considered (F = 2.3907, p = 0.0002). In this respect Glomeromycota seem to be slightly promoted in the lighter BSL soils, which might be due to increased soil porosity and soil chemical fertility. Clay rich BCL soil community structure correlated to a greater degree with soil chemistry influenced by biochar addition. The results showed that soil microeukaryotes were affected by short term carbon amendment, though to a limited extent. The limited effect of biochar loading rates on the soil microbiology could be due to the short incubation period, the lack of added fertiliser nutrients, and also the inherent stability of the soil eukaryotic community. The data suggested the impacts that were observed however included important plant symbiotic organisms. The results also imply biochar applications at different loading levels have differential effects on soil microeurokaryotes in relation to soil properties in particular clay content.


Biochar applications Eukaryota Soil microbiology 18S rRNA Soil amendments 



We gratefully thank Mr Stephen Paterson for technical assistance and also we would like to express our appreciation to all colleagues who provided help during the sample collection.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.


  1. Abujabhah IS, Bound SA, Doyle R, Bowman JP (2016a) Effects of biochar and compost amendments on soil physico-chemical properties and the total community within a temperate agricultural soil. Appl Soil Ecol 98:243–253CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abujabhah IS, Doyle R, Bound SA, Bowman JP (2016b) The effect of biochar loading rates on soil fertility, soil biomass, potential nitrification, and soil community metabolic profiles in three different soils. J Soils Sed 16:2211–2222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abujabhah IS, Doyle RB, Bound SA, Bowman JP (2017) Assessment of bacterial community composition, methanotrophic and nitrogen-cycling bacteria in three soils with different biochar application rates. J Soils Sed 18:148–158CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akhtar M, Malik A (2000) Roles of organic soil amendments and soil organisms in the biological control of plant-parasitic nematodes: a review. Bioresour Technol 74:35–47CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alden L, Demoling F, Bååth E (2001) Rapid method of determining factors limiting bacterial growth in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 67:1830–1838CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Amaral-Zettler LA, McCliment EA, Ducklow HW, Huse SM (2009) A method for studying protistan diversity using massively parallel sequencing of V9 hypervariable regions of small-subunit ribosomal RNA genes. PloS One 4:e6372CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Anderson MJ, Willis TJ (2003) Canonical analysis of principal coordinates: a useful method of constrained ordination for ecology. Ecology 84:511–525CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Anderson MJ, Connell SD, Gillanders BM, Diebel CE, Blom WM, Saunders JE, Landers TJ (2005) Relationships between taxonomic resolution and spatial scales of multivariate variation. J Anim Ecol 74:636–646CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Asai H et al (2009) Biochar amendment techniques for upland rice production in Northern Laos: 1. Soil physical properties, leaf SPAD and grain yield. Field Crops Res 111:81–84CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Atkinson CJ, Fitzgerald JD, Hipps NA (2010) Potential mechanisms for achieving agricultural benefits from biochar application to temperate soils: a review. Plant Soil 337:1–18. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bahram M, Kohout P, Anslan S, Harend H, Abarenkov K, Tedersoo L (2016) Stochastic distribution of small soil eukaryotes resulting from high dispersal and drift in a local environment. ISME J 10(4):885–896CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bai M et al (2013) Degradation kinetics of biochar from pyrolysis and hydrothermal carbonization in temperate soils. Plant Soil 372:375–387CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Blankenberg D, Gordon A, Von Kuster G, Coraor N, Taylor J, Nekrutenko A (2010) Manipulation of FASTQ data with galaxy. Bioinformatics 26:1783–1785CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bouzaiane O, Cherif H, Ayari F, Jedidi N, Hassen A (2007) Municipal solid waste compost dose effects on soil microbial biomass determined by chloroform fumigation-extraction and DNA methods. Ann Microbiol 57:681–686CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Camacho C, Coulouris G, Avagyan V, Ma N, Papadopoulos J, Bealer K, Madden TL (2009) BLAST+: architecture and applications. BMC Bioinform 10:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Caporaso JG et al (2012) Ultra-high-throughput microbial community analysis on the Illumina HiSeq and MiSeq platforms. ISME J 6:1621–1624CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chan KY, Xu Z (2009) Biochar: nutrient properties and their enhancement. Biochar Environ Manag Sci Technol 1:67–84Google Scholar
  18. Chan K, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S (2008) Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Soil Res 46:437–444CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen J et al (2013) Biochar soil amendment increased bacterial but decreased fungal gene abundance with shifts in community structure in a slightly acid rice paddy from Southwest China. Appl Soil Ecol 71:33–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chintala R, Mollinedo J, Schumacher TE, Malo DD, Julson JL (2014) Effect of biochar on chemical properties of acidic soil. Arch Agron Soil Sci 60:393–404CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Fowles M (2007) Black carbon sequestration as an alternative to bioenergy. Biomass Bioenergy 31:426–432CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Gebremikael MT, Steel H, Buchan D, Bert W, De Neve S (2016) Nematodes enhance plant growth and nutrient uptake under C and N-rich conditions. Sci Rep 6:32862CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Gomez J, Denef K, Stewart C, Zheng J, Cotrufo M (2014) Biochar addition rate influences soil microbial abundance and activity in temperate soils. Eur J Soil Sci 65:28–39CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hallmann J, Rodrıguez-Kábana R, Kloepper J (1999) Chitin-mediated changes in bacterial communities of the soil, rhizosphere and within roots of cotton in relation to nematode control. Soil Biol Biochem 31:551–560CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Hammer EC, Balogh-Brunstad Z, Jakobsen I, Olsson PA, Stipp SL, Rillig MC (2014) A mycorrhizal fungus grows on biochar and captures phosphorus from its surfaces. Soil Biol Biochem 77:252–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hardie M, Clothier B, Bound S, Oliver G, Close D (2014) Does biochar influence soil physical properties and soil water availability? Plant Soil 376:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hugerth LW et al (2014) Systematic design of 18S rRNA gene primers for determining eukaryotic diversity in microbial consortia. PloS One 9:e95567CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Juhnke ME, Mathre D, Sands D (1987) Identification and characterization of rhizosphere-competent bacteria of wheat. Appl Environ Microbiol 53:2793–2799Google Scholar
  29. Kelly CN, Peltz CD, Stanton M, Rutherford DW, Rostad CE (2014) Biochar application to hardrock mine tailings: soil quality, microbial activity, and toxic element sorption. Appl Geochem 43:35–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Kimetu JM et al (2008) Reversibility of soil productivity decline with organic matter of differing quality along a degradation gradient. Ecosystems 11:726–739CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kookana R, Sarmah A, Van Zwieten L, Krull E, Singh B (2011) Biochar application to soil: agronomic and environmental benefits and unintended consequences. Adv Agron 112:103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Kozich JJ, Westcott SL, Baxter NT, Highlander SK, Schloss PD (2013) Development of a dual-index sequencing strategy and curation pipeline for analyzing amplicon sequence data on the MiSeq Illumina sequencing platform. Appl Environ Microbiol 79:5112–5120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lawrinenko M, Laird DA (2015) Anion exchange capacity of biochar. Green Chem 17:4628–4636CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Lehmann J, Joseph S (2009) Biochar for environmental management: science and technology. Earthscan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  35. Lehmann J, Rillig MC, Thies J, Masiello CA, Hockaday WC, Crowley D (2011) Biochar effects on soil biota—a review. Soil Biol Biochem 43:1812–1836. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Li W, Godzik A (2006) Cd-hit: a fast program for clustering and comparing large sets of protein or nucleotide sequences. Bioinformatics 22:1658–1659CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Liu Z, Dugan B, Masiello CA, Gonnermann HM (2017) Biochar particle size, shape, and porosity act together to influence soil water properties. Plos One 12:e0179079CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Marstorp H, Guan X, Gong P (2000) Relationship between dsDNA, chloroform labile C and ergosterol in soils of different organic matter contents and pH. Soil Biol Biochem 32:879–882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Meyer F et al (2008) The metagenomics RAST server—a public resource for the automatic phylogenetic and functional analysis of metagenomes. BMC Bioinform 9:386CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Mickan BS, Abbott LK, Stefanova K, Solaiman ZM (2016) Interactions between biochar and mycorrhizal fungi in a water-stressed agricultural soil. Mycorrhiza 26:1–10CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Noyce GL, Winsborough C, Fulthorpe R, Basiliko N (2016) The microbiomes and metagenomes of forest biochars. Sci Rep 6:26425CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Oehl F, Silva GAd, Goto BT, Sieverding E (2011) Glomeromycota: three new genera and glomoid species reorganized. Mycotaxon 116:75–120CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ondov BD, Bergman NH, Phillippy AM (2011) Interactive metagenomic visualization in a web browser. BMC Bioinform 12:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. O’Neill B et al (2009) Bacterial community composition in Brazilian Anthrosols and adjacent soils characterized using culturing and molecular identification. Microb Ecol 58:23–35. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Pruesse E, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2012) SINA: accurate high-throughput multiple sequence alignment of ribosomal RNA genes. Bioinformatics 28:1823–1829CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Quast C et al (2013) The SILVA ribosomal RNA gene database project: improved data processing and web-based tools. Nucl Acids Res 41:D590–D596CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ros M, Klammer S, Knapp B, Aichberger K, Insam H (2006) Long-term effects of compost amendment of soil on functional and structural diversity and microbial activity. Soil Use Manag 22:209–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rutherford DW, Wershaw RL, Rostad CE, Kelly CN (2012) Effect of formation conditions on biochars: compositional and structural properties of cellulose, lignin, and pine biochars. Biomass Bioenergy 46:693–701CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Segata N, Izard J, Waldron L, Gevers D, Miropolsky L, Garrett WS, Huttenhower C (2011) Metagenomic biomarker discovery and explanation. Genome Biol 12:1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sohi S, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R (2010) A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Adv Agron 105:47–82CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Sun D, Meng J, Xu EG, Chen W (2016) Microbial community structure and predicted bacterial metabolic functions in biochar pellets aged in soil after 34 months. Appl Soil Ecol 100:135–143CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Tammeorg P et al (2016) Biochars in soils: towards the required level of scientific understanding. J Environ Eng Landsc Manag. Google Scholar
  53. Tong H, Hu M, Li F, Liu C, Chen M (2014) Biochar enhances the microbial and chemical transformation of pentachlorophenol in paddy soil. Soil Biol Biochem 70:142–150CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Unger R, Killorn R, Brewer C (2011) Effects of soil application of different biochars on selected soil chemical properties. Commun Soil Sci Plant Anal 42:2310–2321. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Uzoma K, Inoue M, Andry H, Fujimaki H, Zahoor A, Nishihara E (2011) Effect of cow manure biochar on maize productivity under sandy soil condition. Soil Use Manag 27:205–212CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Weyers SL, Spokas KA (2011) Impact of biochar on earthworm populations: a review. Appl Environ Soil Sci 2011:12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilke A et al (2012) The M5nr: a novel non-redundant database containing protein sequences and annotations from multiple sources and associated tools. BMC Bioinform 13:141CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Wilkinson MT, Richards PJ, Humphreys GS (2009) Breaking ground: pedological, geological, and ecological implications of soil bioturbation. Earth Sci Rev 97:257–272CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Ye J et al (2017) Chemolithotrophic processes in the bacterial communities on the surface of. ISME J 1:15Google Scholar
  60. Yoshitake S, Uchida M, Koizumi H, Nakatsubo T (2007) Carbon and nitrogen limitation of soil microbial respiration in a High Arctic successional glacier foreland near Ny-Ålesund, Svalbard. Polar Res 26:22–30CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ibrahim S. Abujabhah
    • 1
    Email author
  • Richard B. Doyle
    • 1
  • Sally A. Bound
    • 1
  • John P. Bowman
    • 1
  1. 1.Tasmanian Institute of AgricultureUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations