Exploitation of new endophytic bacteria and their ability to promote sugarcane growth and nitrogen nutrition
- 191 Downloads
Few studies have evaluated endophytic bacteria in relation to plant growth promotion, nitrogen uptake and biological control. The aim of this study was to molecularly and physiologically characterize thirteen endophytic bacteria strains, evaluate their biological control properties and their ability to promote plant growth and plant N nutrition. All the strains produced indole acetic acid and promoted increase of plant biomass, N accumulative amount and N-use efficiency index. None of the strains carries the nifH gene. Four strains stimulated plant nitrate reductase activity, four solubilized phosphate, nine produced siderophores and none produced HCN. Seven strains inhibited Bipolaris sacchari growth and one was antagonistic to Ceratocystis paradoxa. The pathogens were inhibited by the production of diffusible and volatile metabolites by the bacterial strains. Moreover, this is the first study to demonstrate the effect of Delftia acidovorans on sugarcane plant growth, nitrogen metabolism improvement and antagonism to B. sacchari. The most efficient strains in promoting plant growth and exhibiting antagonistic activities towards fungal pathogens were Herbaspirillum frinsingense (IAC-BECa-152) and three Pantoea dispersa strains (IAC-BECa-128, IAC-BECa-129, and IAC-BECa-132). These bacteria show potential to be used as inoculants for sustainable agricultural management, mainly at the seedling production phase.
KeywordsDelftia acidovorans Fungal pathogen antagonism Indole acetic acid Nitrate reductase Plant growth-promoting bacteria Saccharum sp.
The authors acknowledge FAPESP financial support and CAPES for Master and Post-doctoral fellowships. This research was supported by BIOEN/FAPESP (2008/56147-1), The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO-729.004.013), and the CNPq/NWO Program (Project Number 456420/2013-4).
APDS conceived the study. APDS, RPFI, FCCM, AOF, SCS and MAPC performed the experiments. APDS, RPFI, EEK and MAPC wrote the paper.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Adesemoye AO, Yuen G, Watts DB (2017) Microbial inoculants for optimized plant nutrient use in integrated pest and input management systems. In: Kumar V, Kumar M, Sharma S, Prasad R (eds) Probiotics and plant health. Springer, SingaporeGoogle Scholar
- Bremner JM (1965) Total nitrogen. In: Black CA (ed) Methods of soil analysis. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, pp 1149–1178Google Scholar
- Cavalcante VS, Döbereiner J (1988) A new acid tolerant nitrogen-fixing bacteria associated with sugarcane. Plant Soil 10:823–831Google Scholar
- Döbereiner J, Baldani VLD, Baldani JI (1995) Como isolar e identificar bactérias diazotróficas de plantas não-leguminosas. Embrapa-SPI, Brasília, p p60Google Scholar
- Donato VMTS, Andrade AG, Douza ES, França JGE, Maciel GA (2004) Atividade enzimática em variedades de cana-de-açúcar cultivadas in vitro sob diferentes níveis de nitrogênio. PesqAgrop Bras 39:1087–1093Google Scholar
- Freitas RP (2011) Bactérias diazotróficas endofíticas associadas à cana-de-açúcar. Dissertation, Instituto Agronômico de CampinasGoogle Scholar
- Girard JC, Rott P (2000) Pineaple disease. In: Rott P, Bailey RA, Comstock JC, Croft BJ, Saumtally AS (eds) A guide to sugarcane diseases. CIRAD-ISSCT, Montpellier, pp 131–135Google Scholar
- Hernández-León R, Rojas-Solís D, Contreras-Pérez M, Orozco-Mosqueda MC, Macías-Rodríguez LI, Cruz HR, Valencia-Cantero E, Santoyo G (2015) Characterization of the antifungal and plant growth-promoting effects of diffusible and volatile organic compounds produced by Pseudomonas fluorescens strains. Biol Control 81:83–92. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocontrol.2014.11.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kröber M, Wibberg D, Grosch R (2014) Effect of the strain Bacillus amyloliquefaciensFZB42 on the microbial community in the rhizosphere of lettuce under field conditions analyzed by whole metagenome sequencing. Front Microbiol 5:252. https://doi.org/10.3389/fmicb.2014.00252 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kruasuwan W, Thamchaipenet A (2016) Diversity of culturable plant growth-promoting bacterial endophytes associated with sugarcane roots and their effect of growth by co-inoculation of diazotrophs and actinomycetes. J Plant Growth Regul. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00344-016-9604-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Mendes R, Pizzinari-Kleiner AA, Araujo WL, Raaijmakers JM (2007) Diversity of cultivated endophytic bacteria from sugarcane: genetic and biochemical characterization of Burkholderia cepacia complex isolates. Appl Environ Microbiol. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01222-07 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Prasannakumar SP, Gowtham HG, Hariprasad P (2015) Delftia tsuruhatensis WGR-UOM-BT1, a novel rhizobacterium woth PGPR properties from Rauwolfia serpentina (L.) Benth. Ex Kurz supressess fungal phytopathogens by producing a new antibiotic-AMTM. Lett Appl Microbiol 61:460–468CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Rodrigues EP (2004) Caraterização fisiológica de estirpes de Azospirillum amazonense e a avaliação dos efeitos da inoculação em plantas de arroz inundado. Federal Rural of Rio de Janeiro, Seropédica, Rio de JaneiroGoogle Scholar
- Vacheron J, Desbrosses G, Bouffaud M-L, Touraine B, Moënne-Loccoz Y, Muller D, Legendre L, Wisniewski-Dyé F, Prigent-Combaret C (2013) Plant growth- promoting rhizobacteria and root system functioning. Front Plant Sci. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2013.00356 PubMedPubMedCentralCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Verma SK, Kingsley K, Bergen M, English C, Elmore M, Kharwar RN, White JF (2018) Bacterial endophytes from rice cut grass (Leersiaoryzoides L.) increase growth, promot root gravitropic response, stimulate root hair formation, and protect rice seedlings from disease. Plant Soil 422:223–238CrossRefGoogle Scholar