The impact of depuration on mussel hepatopancreas bacteriome composition and predicted metagenome
- 234 Downloads
Due to the rapid elimination of bacteria through normal behaviour of filter feeding and excretion, the decontamination of hazardous contaminating bacteria from shellfish is performed by depuration. This process, under conditions that maximize shellfish filtering activity, is a useful method to eliminate microorganisms from bivalves. The microbiota composition in bivalves reflects that of the environment of harvesting waters, so quite different bacteriomes would be expected in shellfish collected in different locations. Bacterial accumulation within molluscan shellfish occurs primarily in the hepatopancreas. In order to assess the effect of the depuration process on these different bacteriomes, in this work we used 16S RNA pyrosequencing and metagenome prediction to assess the impact of 15 h of depuration on the whole hepatopancreas bacteriome of mussels collected in three different locations.
KeywordsMussel depuration 16S RNA sequencing Taxonomic profiling Metagenome prediction
The research leading to these results has received funding from the following FEDER cofunded-grants. From CDTI and Technological Funds, supported by Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad, AGL2012-40185-CO2-01, AGL2014-58210-R, andConsellería de Cultura, Educación e Ordenación Universitaria, GRC2013-016, and through Axencia Galega de Innovación, Spain, ITC-20133020 SINTOX. From CDTI under ISIP Programme, Spain, IDI-20130304 APTAFOOD. From the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme managed by REA—Research Executive Agency (FP7/2007-2013) under grant agreement 312184 PHARMASEA.
Conflict of interests
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Anonymous (2004) Directive of the European Parlament and of the CouncilGoogle Scholar
- Anonymous (2006) Directive of the European Parlament and of the Council of 12th of December 2006 Laying Down Harvest Water QualityGoogle Scholar
- Diario Oficial de la Unión Europea (2007) REGLAMENTO (CE) No 1441/2007 DE LA COMISIÓN de 5 de diciembre de 2007 que modifica el Reglamento (CE) no 2073/2005 relativo a los criterios microbiológicos aplicables a los productos alimenticiosGoogle Scholar
- Dore WJ, Farthing J, Laing I (2003) Depuration conditions for great scallops (Pecten maximus). J Shellfish Res 22:409–414Google Scholar
- Huss H (1994) Assurance of seafood quality. FAO Fish Tech Pap 334:1–169Google Scholar
- Kellogg CA, Lisle JT, Galkiewicz JP (2009) Culture-independent characterization of bacterial communities associated with the cold-water coral Lophelia pertusa in the northeastern Gulf of Mexico. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:2294–2303. https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.02357-08 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- McKinney W (2010) Data Structures for Statistical Computing in Python. Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference. pp 51–56Google Scholar
- Richards GP (2001) Title : enteric virus contamination of shellfish: intervention strategies. J Shellfish Res 20:1241–1243Google Scholar
- Roderick GE, Schneider KR (1994) Depuration and relaying of molluscan shellfish. In: Hackney CR, Pierson MD (eds) Environment indicators and shellfish safety. Chapman & Hall, New YorkGoogle Scholar
- Vezzulli L, Stagnaro L, Grande C, Tassistro G, Canesi L, Pruzzo C (2018) Comparative 16SrDNA Gene-Based Microbiota Profiles of the Pacific Oyster (Crassostrea gigas) and the Mediterranean Mussel (Mytilus galloprovincialis) from a Shellfish Farm (Ligurian Sea, Italy). Microb Ecol 75(2):495–504. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00248-017-1051-6 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar