Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 109, Issue 12, pp 1555–1571 | Cite as

Ophiostomatoid fungi associated with mangroves in South Africa, including Ophiostoma palustre sp. nov.

  • J. Alexander Osorio
  • Z. Wilhelm De Beer
  • Michael J. Wingfield
  • Jolanda Roux
Original Paper

Abstract

Mangrove trees are continuously under stress due to environmental and/or anthropogenic pressures, which expose them to attack by pathogens, compromising their survival. Ophiostomatoid fungi cause sap stain and diseases of a wide spectrum of tree species globally. These fungi infect trees through natural, insect, animal and/or human made wounds. During routine surveys of mangrove trees in South Africa, wounds on branches and stems of Avicennia marina were regularly monitored for the presence of ophiostomatoid fungi at ten study sites in the country. The stems of four mangrove species, A. marina, Bruguiera gymnorrhiza, Rhizophora mucronata and Barringtonia racemosa were also wounded and evaluated for the appearance of these fungi. Ophiostomatoid fungi were obtained from the mangrove associate B. racemosa, but not from any of the true mangroves. Analyses of DNA sequence data for the internal transcribed spacer, β-tubulin, calmodulin and translation elongation factor gene regions revealed that the fungi isolated from the wounds on B. racemosa belong to three species in the Ophiostomataceae, including a new taxon described here as Ophiostoma palustre sp. nov. These results suggest that the mangrove associate B. racemosa is more prone to colonization by ophiostomatoid fungi than the true mangroves.

Keywords

Barringtonia Ophiostomatales Sporothrix Wound infection 

References

  1. Adams JB, Colloty BM, Bate GC (2004) The distribution and state of mangroves along the coast of Transkei, Eastern Cape Province, South Africa. Wetl Ecol Manag 12:531–541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Alongi DM (2002) Present state and future of the world’s mangrove forests. Environ Conserv 29:331–349CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altschul SF, Gish W, Miller W, Myers EW, Lipman DJ (1990) Basic local alignment search tool. J Mol Biol 215:403–410CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Brasier CM (1991) Ophiostoma novo-ulmi sp. nov., causative agent of current Dutch elm disease pandemics. Mycopathologia 115:151–161CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brasier CM (2000) Intercontinental spread and continuing evolution of the Dutch elm disease pathogens. In: Dunn CP (ed) The elms: breeding, conservation, and disease management. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston, pp 61–72CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cantrell SA, Dianese JC, Fell J, Gunde-Cimerman Zalar P (2011) Unusual fungal niches. Mycologia 103:1161–1174CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Crous PW, Wingfield MJ, Guarro J, Hernandez-Restrepo M, Sutton DA, Acharya K, Barber PA, Boekhout T, Dimitrov RA, Dueñas M, Dutta AK (2015) Ophiostoma eucalyptigena Barber & Crous, sp. nov. fungal planet description sheets: 331. Persoonia 34:192–193CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Darriba D, Taboada G, Doallo R, Posada D (2012) jModelTest 2: more models, new heuristics and parallel computing. Nat Methods 9:772CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Davidson RW (1935) Fungi causing stain in logs and lumber in the southern states, including five new species. J Agric Res 50:789–807Google Scholar
  10. De Beer ZW, Wingfield MJ (2013) Emerging lineages in the Ophiostomatales. In: Seifert KA, De Beer ZW, Wingfield MJ (eds) The ophiostomatoid fungi: expanding frontiers. CBS, Utrecht, pp 21–46Google Scholar
  11. De Beer ZW, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ (2003) The Ophiostoma piceae complex in the Southern hemisphere: a phylogenetic study. Mycol Res 107:469–476CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. De Beer ZW, Seifert KA, Wingfield MJ (2013) The ophiostomatoid fungi: their dual position in the Sordariomycetes. In: Seifert KA, De Beer ZW, Wingfield MJ (eds) The ophiostomatoid fungi: expanding frontiers. CBS Biodiversity Series 12. CBS Fungal Diversity Centre, Utrecht, pp 1–19Google Scholar
  13. De Beer ZW, Duong TA, Wingfield MJ (2016) The divorce of Sporothrix and Ophiostoma: solution to a problematic relationship. Stud Mycol. doi:10.1016/j.simyco.2016.07.001 PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  14. De Errasti A, de Beer ZW, Coetzee MPA, Roux J, Rajchenberg M, Wingfield MJ (2016) Three new species of ophiostomatales from Nothofagus in Patagonia. Mycol Prog 15:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Duke NC, Meynecke JO, Dittmann S, Ellison AM, Anger K, Berger U, Cannicci S, Diele K, Ewel KC, Field CD, Koedam N, Lee SY, Marchand C, Nordhaus I, Dahdouh-Guebas F (2007) A world without mangroves? Science 317:41–42CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Duong TA, de Beer ZW, Wingfield BD, Wingfield MJ (2012) Phylogeny and taxonomy of species in the Grosmannia serpens complex. Mycologia 104:715–732CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Fraedrich SW, Harrington TC, Rabaglia RJ, Ulyshen MD, Mayfield AE, Hanula JL, Eickwort JM, Miller DR (2008) A fungal symbiont of the redbay ambrosia beetle causes a lethal wilt in redbay and other lauraceae in the southeastern United States. Plant Dis 92:215–224CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gardes M, Bruns TD (1993) ITS primers with enhanced specificity for Basidiomycetes applications to the identification of mycorrhizae and rusts. Mol Ecol 2:113–118CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Geldenhuis MM, Roux J, Montenegro F, de Beer ZW, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD (2004) Identification and pathogenicity of Graphium and Pesotum species from machete wounds on Schizolobium parahybum in Ecuador. Fungal Divers 15:135–149Google Scholar
  20. Gibbs JN (1993) The biology of ophiostomatoid fungi causing sapstain in trees and freshly cut logs. In: Wingfield MJ, Seifert KA, Webber JF (eds) Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: taxonomy, ecology and pathogenicity. APS Press, St. Paul, pp 153–160Google Scholar
  21. Gilbert GS, Mejía M, Rojas E (2002) Fungal diversity and plant disease in mangrove forests: salt excretion as a possible defense mechanism. Oecologia 132:278–285CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Glass NL, Donaldson GC (1995) Development of primer sets designed for use with the PCR to amplify conserved genes from filamentous ascomycetes. Appl Environ Microbiol 61:1323–1330PubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Grobbelaar JW, Aghayeva D, de Beer ZW, Bloomer P, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD (2009) Delimitation of Ophiostoma quercus and its synonyms using multiple gene phylogenies. Mycol Prog 8:221–236CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Grobbelaar JW, de Beer ZW, Bloomer P, Wingfield MJ, Wingfield BD (2010) Ophiostoma tsotsi sp. nov., A wound-infesting fungus of hardwood trees in Africa. Mycopathologia 169:413–423CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Grobbelaar JW, de Beer ZW, Bloomer P, Wingfield MJ, Zhou XD, Wingfield BD (2011) Discovery of Ophiostoma tsotsi on Eucalyptus wood chips in China. Mycoscience 52:111–118CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Guindon S, Gascuel O (2003) A simple, fast and accurate method to estimate large phylogenies by maximum-likelihood. Syst Biol 52:696–704CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Harrington TC (1981) Cycloheximide sensitivity as a taxonomic character in Ceratocystis. Mycologia 73:1123–1129CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Harrington TC (2005) Ecology and evolution of mycophagous bark beetles and their fungal partners. In: Vega FE, Blackwell M (eds) Insect-fungal associations: ecology and evolution. Oxford University Press, Inc, New York, pp 257–292Google Scholar
  29. Harrington TC, Cobb FW Jr (1988) Leptographium root diseases on conifers. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  30. Harrington TC, McNew D, Steimel J, Hofstra D, Farrell R (2001) Phylogeny and taxonomy of the Ophiostoma piceae complex and the Dutch elm disease fungi. Mycologia 93:111–136CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Harrington TC, Aghayeva DN, Fraedrich SW (2010) New combinations in Raffaelea, Ambrosiella, and Hyalorhinocladiella, and four new species from the redbay ambrosia beetle, Xyleborus glabratus. Mycotaxon 111:337–361CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hayslett M, Juzwik J, Moltzan B (2008) Three colopterus beetle species carry the oak wilt fungus to fresh wounds on red oak in Missouri. Plant Dis 92:270–275CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hedgcock GG (1906) Studies upon some chromogenic fungi which discolor wood. Mo Bot Gard Annu Rep 17:59–114Google Scholar
  34. Henry BW, Moses CS, Richards CA, Riker AJ (1944) Oak wilt, its significance, symptoms and cause. Phytopathology 34:636–647Google Scholar
  35. Hutchison LJ, Reid J (1988) Taxonomy of some potential wood-staining fungi from New Zealand. 1. Ophiostomataceae New Zealand J Bot 26:63–81CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jacobs K, Wingfield MJ (2001) Leptographium species: tree pathogens, insect associates and agents of blue-stain. The American Phytopathological Society Press, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  37. Jacobs K, Bergdahl DR, Wingfield MJ, Halik S, Seifert KA, Bright DE, Wingfield BD (2004) Leptographium wingfieldii introduced into North America and found associated with exotic Tomicus piniperda and native bark beetles. Mycol Res 108:411–418CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Juzwik L, Cease KR, Meyer JM (1998) Acquisition of Ophiostoma quercus and Ceratocystis fagacearum by nitidulids from O. quercus-colonized oak wilt mats. Plant Dis 82:239–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Juzwik J, Harrington TC, McDonald WL (2008) The origin of Ceratocystis fagacearum, the Oak wilt fungus. Annu Rev Phytopathol 46:13–26CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Kamgan NG, Jacobs K, de Beer ZW, Wingfield MJ, Roux J (2008) Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma species including three new taxa, associated with wounds on native South African trees. Fungal Divers 29:37–59Google Scholar
  41. Kamgan NG, Solheim H, de Beer ZW, Grobbelaar JW, Jacobs K, Wingfield MJ, Roux J (2010) Ophiostoma species, including Ophiostoma borealis sp. nov., infecting wounds of native broad-leaved trees in Norway. Cryptogam Mycol 31:285–303Google Scholar
  42. Kamgan NG, de Beer ZW, Wingfield MJ, Mohammed C, Carnegie AJ, Pegg GS, Roux J (2011) Ophiostoma species (Ophiostomatales, Ascomycota), including two new taxa on eucalypts in Australia. Aust J Bot 59:283–297CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kamgan NG, de Beer ZW, Wingfield MJ, Roux J (2012) A diverse assemblage of Ophiostoma species, including two new taxa on eucalypt trees in South Africa. Mycol Prog 11:515–533CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Katoh K, Standley DM (2013) MAFFT Multiple sequence alignment software version 7: improvements in performance and usability. Mol Biol Evol 30:772–780CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Kile GA (1993) Plant diseases caused by species of Ceratocystis sensu stricto and Chalara. In: Wingfield MJ, Seifert KA, Webber JF (eds) Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: taxonomy, ecology and pathogenicity. APS Press, St. Paul, pp 173–183Google Scholar
  46. Kirisits T (2004) Fungal associates of European bark beetles with special emphasis on the ophiostomatoid fungi. In: Lieutier F, Day KR, Battisti A, Grégoire JC, Evans HF (eds) Bark and wood boring insects in living trees in Europe, a synthesis. Kluwer Academic Press, Utrecht, pp 181–235CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Klepzig KD, Six DL (2004) Bark beetle-fungal symbiosis: context dependency in complex associations. Symbiosis 37:189–205Google Scholar
  48. Kubono T, Ito S (2002) Raffaelea quercivora sp. nov. associated with mass mortality of Japanese oak, and the ambrosia beetle (Platypus quercivorus). Mycoscience 43:255–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Larget B, Simon DL (1999) Markov chain monte carlo algorithms for the bayesian analysis of phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol 16:750–759CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Malloch D, Blackwell M (1993) Dispersal biology of the ophiostomatoid fungi. In: Wingfield MJ, Seifert KA, JF Webber (eds) Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: taxonomy, ecology and pathogenicity. American Phytopathological Society Press, St. Paul, Minnesota, USA, pp 195–206Google Scholar
  51. Nagelkerken I, Blaber SJM, Bouillon S, Green P, Haywood M, Kirton LG, Meynecke JO, Pawlik J, Penrose HM, Sasekumar A, Somerfield PJ (2008) The habitat function of mangroves for terrestrial and marine fauna: a review. Aquat Bot 89:155–185CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Osorio JA, Wingfield MJ, de Beer ZW, Roux J (2015) Pseudocercospora mapelanensis sp. nov., associated with a fruit and leaf disease of Barringtonia racemosa in South Africa. Australas Plant Pathol 44:349–359CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Page RD (1996) TREEVIEW: an application to display phylogenetic trees on personal computers. Comput Appl Biosci 12:357–358PubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Raeder U, Broda P (1985) Rapid preparation of DNA from filamentous fungi. Lett Appl Microbiol 1:17–20CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Rajkaran A, Adams J, Taylor R (2009) Historic and recent (2006) state of mangroves in small estuaries from Mlalazi to Mtamvuna in KwaZulu-Natal, South Africa. South For 7:287–296Google Scholar
  56. Rambaut A, Drummond AJ (2007) Tracer 1.4. Available at http://beast.bio.ed.ac.uk/Tracer
  57. Rayner RW (1970) A mycological colour chart. CMI and British Mycological Society, KewGoogle Scholar
  58. Ronquist F, Teslenko M, van der Mark P, Ayres DL, Darling A et al (2012) MrBayes 3.2: efficient Bayesian phylogenetic inference and model choice across a large model space. Syst Biolo 61:539–542CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Roux J, Wingfield MJ (2009) Ceratocystis species: emerging pathogens of non-native plantation Eucalyptus and Acacia species. South For 7:115–120Google Scholar
  60. Roux J, Dunlop R, Wingfield MJ (1999) Susceptibility of elite Acacia mearnsii families to Ceratocystis wilt in South Africa. J For Res 4:187–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Roux J, Van Wyk M, Hatting H, Wingfield MJ (2004) Ceratocystis species infecting stem wounds on Eucalyptus grandis in South Africa. Plant Pathol 53:414–421CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Roux J, Heath RN, Labuschagne L, Kamgan Nkuekam K, Wingfield MJ (2007) Occurrence of the wattle wilt pathogen, Ceratocystis albifundus on native South African trees. Forest Pathol 37:292–302CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Seifert KA, Wingfield MJ, Kendrick WB (1993) Sapstain of commercial lumber by species of Ophiostoma and Ceratocystis. In: Wingfield MJ, Seifert KA, Webber J (eds) Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: taxonomy, ecology and pathogenicity. American Phytopathological Society (APS), St. Paul, pp 141–151Google Scholar
  64. Seifert KA, de Beer ZW, Wingfield MJ (2013) The ophiostomatoid fungi: expanding frontiers. CBS-KNAW Fungal Biodiversity Centre, UtrechtGoogle Scholar
  65. Sinclair WA, Howard HL (2005) Diseases of trees and shrubs. Ed. 2. Comstock Publishing Associates, Ithaca, London: Cornell University PressGoogle Scholar
  66. Six DL (2003) Bark beetle-fungus symbioses. In: Bourtzis K, Miller T (eds) Insect Symbioses. CRS Press, Boca Raton, pp 97–114CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Spalding M, Kainuma M, Collins L (2010) World Atlas of mangroves. Earthscan, Washington DCGoogle Scholar
  68. Steinke TD (1999) Mangroves in South African estuaries. In: Allanson BR, Baird D (eds) Estuaries of South Africa. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 119–140CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sugiura N (1978) Further analysis of the data by akaike’s information criterion and the finite corrections. Commun Stat Theory Methods 7:13–26CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tamura K, Peterson D, Peterson N, Stecher G, Nei M, Kumar S (2011) MEGA5: molecular evolutionary genetics analysis using maximum likelihood, evolutionary distance, and maximum parsimony methods. Mol Biol Evol 28:2731–2739CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
  71. Tarigan M, van Wyk M, Roux J, Tjahjono B, Wingfield MJ (2010) Three new Ceratocystis spp. in the Ceratocystis moniliformis complex from wounds on Acacia mangium and A. crassicarpa. Mycoscience 51:53–67CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Tarigan M, Roux J, van Wyk M, Tjahjono B, Wingfield MJ (2011) A new wilt and die-back disease of Acacia mangium associated with Ceratocystis manginecans and C. acaciivora sp. nov. in Indonesia. S Afr J Bot 77:292–304CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Thwaites JM, Farrell RL, Duncan SM, Reay SD, Blanchette RA, Hadar E, Hadar Y, Harrington TC, McNew D (2005) Survey of potential sapstain fungi on Pinus radiata in New Zealand. New Zealand J Bot 43:653–663CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Tomlinson PB (1986) The botany of mangroves. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  75. Valiela I, Bowen JL, York JK (2001) Mangrove forests: one of the world’s threatened major tropical environments at least 35% of the area of mangrove forests has been lost in the past two decades, losses that exceed those for tropical rain forests and coral reefs, two other well-known threatened environments. Bioscience 51:807–815CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Van Wyk M, Al Adawi AO, Khan IA, Deadman ML, Al Jahwari AA, Wingfield BD, Ploetz R, Wingfield MJ (2007) Ceratocystis manginecans sp. nov., causal agent of a destructive mango wilt disease in Oman and Pakistan. Fungal Divers 27:213–230Google Scholar
  77. Villarreal M, Rubio V, de Troya MT, Arenall F (2005) A new Ophiostoma species isolated from Pinus pinaster in the Iberian Peninsula. Mycotaxon 92:259–268Google Scholar
  78. Wang L, Mu M, Li X, Lin P, Wang W (2010) Differentiation between true mangroves and mangrove associates based on leaf traits and salt contents. J Plant Ecol 4:292–301CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Wen L, Cai X, Xu F, She Z, Chan WL, Vrijmoed LL, Jones EG, Lin Y (2009) Three metabolites from the mangrove endophytic fungus Sporothrix sp. (# 4335) from the South China Sea. J Org Chem 74:1093–1098CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  80. White TJ, Bruns T, Lee S, Taylor J (1990) Amplification and direct sequencing of fungal ribosomal RNA genes for phylogenetics. In: Innis MA, Gelfand DH, Sninsky JJ, White TJ (eds) PCR Protocols: a guide to methods and applications. Academic Press, San Diego, pp 315–322Google Scholar
  81. Wingfield MJ, Seifert KA, Webber J (1993) Ceratocystis and Ophiostoma: taxonomy, ecology and pathogenicity. The American Phytopathological Society Press, St. PaulGoogle Scholar
  82. Yin M, Wingfield MJ, Zhou X, de Beer ZW (2016) Multigene phylogenies and morphological characterization of five new Ophiostoma spp. associated with spruce-infesting bark beetles in China. Fungal Biol 120:454–470CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  83. Zanzot J, de Beer ZW, Eckhardt L, Wingfield M (2010) A new Ophiostoma species from loblolly pine roots in the southeastern United States. Mycol Prog 9:447–457CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Zhou X, de Beer ZW, Wingfield MJ (2006) DNA sequence comparisons of Ophiostoma spp., including Ophiostoma aurorae sp. nov., associated with pine bark beetles in South Africa. Stud Mycol 55:269–277CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer International Publishing Switzerland 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  • J. Alexander Osorio
    • 1
  • Z. Wilhelm De Beer
    • 1
  • Michael J. Wingfield
    • 1
  • Jolanda Roux
    • 2
  1. 1.Department of Microbiology and Plant Pathology, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology (CTHB), Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI)University of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa
  2. 2.Department of Plant and Soil Sciences, DST/NRF Centre of Excellence in Tree Health Biotechnology (CTHB), Forestry and Agricultural Biotechnology Institute (FABI)University of PretoriaPretoriaSouth Africa

Personalised recommendations