Pan-genome analysis of Aeromonas hydrophila, Aeromonas veronii and Aeromonas caviae indicates phylogenomic diversity and greater pathogenic potential for Aeromonas hydrophila
- 719 Downloads
Aeromonas species are important pathogens of fishes and aquatic animals capable of infecting humans and other animals via food. Due to the paucity of pan-genomic studies on aeromonads, the present study was undertaken to analyse the pan-genome of three clinically important Aeromonas species (A. hydrophila, A. veronii, A. caviae). Results of pan-genome analysis revealed an open pan-genome for all three species with pan-genome sizes of 9181, 7214 and 6884 genes for A. hydrophila, A. veronii and A. caviae, respectively. Core-genome: pan-genome ratio (RCP) indicated greater genomic diversity for A. hydrophila and interestingly RCP emerged as an effective indicator to gauge genomic diversity which could possibly be extended to other organisms too. Phylogenomic network analysis highlighted the influence of homologous recombination and lateral gene transfer in the evolution of Aeromonas spp. Prediction of virulence factors indicated no significant difference among the three species though analysis of pathogenic potential and acquired antimicrobial resistance genes revealed greater hazards from A. hydrophila. In conclusion, the present study highlighted the usefulness of whole genome analyses to infer evolutionary cues for Aeromonas species which indicated considerable phylogenomic diversity for A. hydrophila and hitherto unknown genomic evidence for pathogenic potential of A. hydrophila compared to A. veronii and A. caviae.
KeywordsAeromonas Antimicrobial resistance Pan-genome Phylogeny Recombination Virulence
Authors are thankful to Director, ICAR Research Complex for NEH Region for providing necessary facilities, to Administrator, Nazareth Hospital, Shillong for her support. First author is also thankful to Ms. Dyuti Purkait and Dr. D. Chakraborty for help with data analysis.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
No conflict of interest declared.
- Beaz-Hidalgo R, Hossain MJ, Liles MR, Figueras M-J (2015b) Strategies to avoid wrongly labelled genomes using as example the detected wrong taxonomic affiliation for Aeromonas genomes in the GenBank database. PLoS ONE 10:e0115813. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0115813 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Evangelopoulou G, Filioussis G, Kritas S et al (2015) Isolation and antimicrobial testing of Aeromonas spp., Citrobacter spp., Cronobacter spp., Enterobacter spp., Escherichia spp., Klebsiella spp., and Trabulsiella spp. from the gallbladder of pigs. Pol J Microbiol Pol Tow Microbiol Pol Soc Microbiol 64:185–188Google Scholar
- Ghatak S, Agarwal RK, Bhilegaonkar KN (2009) Epidemiology of multi-drug resistant Aeromonas spp. J Vet Public Heal 7:1–11Google Scholar
- Ghatak S, Agarwal RK, Bhilegaonkar KN, Gill JPS (2012) Molecular detection of food-borne Aeromonas species. Indian J Anim Sci 82:785–793Google Scholar
- Martino ME, Fasolato L, Montemurro F et al (2011) Determination of microbial diversity of Aeromonas strains on the basis of multilocus sequence typing, phenotype, and presence of putative virulence genes. Appl Environ Microbiol 77:4986–5000. doi: 10.1128/AEM.00708-11 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar
- Pridgeon JW, Mu X, Klesius PH (2013) Biochemical and molecular characterization of the novobiocin and rifampicin resistant Aeromonas hydrophila vaccine strain AL09-71 N + R compared to its virulent parent strain AL09-71. Vet Microbiol 165:349–357. doi: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2013.03.018 CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
- Sreedharan K, Philip R, Singh ISB (2012) Virulence potential and antibiotic susceptibility pattern of motile aeromonads associated with freshwater ornamental fish culture systems: a possible threat to public health. Braz J Microbiol 43:754–765. doi: 10.1590/S1517-83822012000200040 CrossRefPubMedPubMedCentralGoogle Scholar