Advertisement

Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 101, Issue 3, pp 493–506 | Cite as

Compositions of microbial communities associated with oil and water in a mesothermic oil field

  • Yuriy Kryachko
  • Xiaoli Dong
  • Christoph W. Sensen
  • Gerrit Voordouw
Original Paper

Abstract

Samples of produced water and oil obtained from the Enermark field (near Medicine Hat, Alberta, Canada) were separated into oil and aqueous phases first gravitationally and then through centrifugation at 20°C in an atmosphere of 90% N2 and 10% CO2. Biomass that remained associated with oil after gravitational separation (1×g) was dislodged by centrifugation at 25,000×g. DNA was isolated from the aqueous and oil-associated biomass fractions and subjected to polymerase chain reaction amplification with primers targeting bacterial and archaeal 16S rRNA genes. DNA pyrosequencing and bioinformatics tools were used to characterize the resulting 16S rRNA gene amplicons. The oil-associated microbial community was less diverse than that of the aqueous phase and had consistently higher representation of hydrogenotrophs (methanogens of the genera Methanolobus and Methanobacterium and acetogens of the genus Acetobacterium), indicating the oil phase to be a primary source of hydrogen. Many known hydrocarbon degraders were also found to be oil-attached, e.g. representatives of the gammaproteobacterial genus Thalassolituus, the actinobacterial genus Rhodococcus and the alphaproteobacterial genera Sphingomonas, Brevundimonas and Stappia. In contrast, all eight representatives of genera of the Deltaproteobacteria identified were found to be associated with the aqueous phase, likely because their preferred growth substrates are mostly water-soluble. Hence, oil attachment was seen for genera acting on substrates found primarily in the oil phase.

Keywords

Microbial adhesion Oil biodegradation Synthrophy MEOR Methanogenesis DNA pyrosequencing 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by funding from Genome Canada, Genome Alberta, the Government of Alberta, Genome BC and a Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Industrial Research Chair Award to GV. The latter was also supported by Baker Hughes Canada, Commercial Microbiology Ltd., the Computer Modelling Group Ltd., ConocoPhillips Co., YPF, Saudi Aramco, Shell Canada Ltd., Suncor Energy Developments Inc. and Yara. We thank Ryan Ertmoed from Baker Hughes Canada for providing samples of produced oil–water mixtures, Dr. Sean Caffrey for organizational efforts and recommendations on the applications of statistical methods and Drs. Indranil Chatterjee and Rhonda Clark for their coordinating contributions.

Supplementary material

10482_2011_9658_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (173 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 172 kb)
10482_2011_9658_MOESM2_ESM.pdf (164 kb)
Supplementary material 2 (PDF 163 kb)

References

  1. Abbasnezhad H, Gray MR, Foght JM (2008) Two different mechanisms for adhesion of Gram-negative bacterium, Pseudomonas fluorescens LP6a, to an oil–water interface. Colloid Surface B 62:36–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Akasaka H, Ueki A, Hanada S, Kamagata Y, Ueki K (2003) Propionicimonas paludicola gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel facultatively anaerobic Gram-positive, propionate-producing bacterium isolated from plant residue in irrigated rice field soil. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 53:1991–1998PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Al-Awadhi H, Sulaiman RH, Mahmoud HM, Radwan SS (2007) Alkaliphilic and halophilic hydrocarbon-utilizing bacteria from Kuwaiti coasts of the Arabian Gulf. Appl Microbiol Biot 77:183–186CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Andreoni V, Bernasconi S, Colombo M, van Beilen JB, Cavalca L (2000) Detection of genes for alkane and naphthalene catabolism in Rhodococcus sp. strain 1BN. Environ Microbiol 2:572–577PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bae H-S, Moe WM, Yan J, Tiago I, da Costa MS, Rainey FA (2006) Propionicicella superfundia gen. nov., sp. nov., a chlorosolvent-tolerant propionate-forming, facultative anaerobic bacterium isolated from contaminated groundwater. Syst Appl Microbiol 29:404–413PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Banat IM (1995) Biosurfactants production and possible uses in microbial enhanced oil recovery and oil pollution remediation: a review. Bioresource Technol 51:1–12CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Beckmann S, Lueders T, Krüger M, von Netzer F, Engelen B, Cypionka H (2011) Acetogens and acetoclastic Methanosarcinales govern methane formation in abandoned coal mines. Appl Environ Microb 77(11):3749–3756CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bryant RS, Burchfield TE (1989) Review of microbial technology for improving oil recovery. SPE Reservoir Eng 4:151–154Google Scholar
  9. Cai H-Y, Shaw JM, Chung KH (2001) Hydrogen solubility measurements in heavy oil and bitumen cuts. Fuel 80:1055–1063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chaîneau CH, Morel J, Dupont J, Bury E, Oudot J (1999) Comparison of the fuel oil biodegradation potential of hydrocarbon-assimilating microorganisms isolated from a temperate agricultural soil. Sci Total Environ 227(2–3):237–247PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Cornish-Shartau SL, Yurkiw M, Lin S et al (2010) Ammonium concentrations in produced waters from a mesothermic oil field subjected to nitrate injection decrease through formation of denitrifying biomass and anammox activity. Appl Environ Microbiol 76:4977–4987CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dahle H, Birkeland N-K (2006) Thermovirga lienii gen. nov., sp. nov., a novel moderately thermophilic, anaerobic, amino-acid-degrading bacterium isolated from a North Sea oil well. Int J Syst Evol Micr 56:1539–1545CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dong C, Lai Q, Chen L, Sun F, Shao Z, Yu Z (2010) Oceanibaculum pacificum sp. nov., isolated from hydrothermal field sediment of the south-west Pacific Ocean. Int J Syst Evol Micr 60:219–222CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Fitch WM (1971) Toward defining the course of evolution: Minimum change for a specific tree topology. Syst Zool 20:406–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Gentleman R (2008) Bioinformatics with R. Chapman & Hall/CRC, Boca RatonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gieg LM, Duncan KE, Suflita JM (2008) Bioenergy production via microbial conversion of residual oil to natural gas. Appl Environ Microbiol 74:3022–3029PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Grabowski A, Nercessian O, Fayolle F, Blanchet D, Jeanthon C (2005a) Microbial diversity in production waters of a low-temperature biodegraded oil reservoir. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 54:427–443PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Grabowski A, Tindall BJ, Bardin V, Blanchet D, Jeanthon C (2005b) Petrimonas sulfuriphila gen. nov., sp. nov., a mesophilic fermentative bacterium isolated from a biodegraded oil reservoir. Int J Syst Evol Micr 55:1113–1121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Green MS, Flanegan KC, Gilcrease PC (2008) Characterization of a methanogenic consortium enriched from a coalbed methane well in the Powder River Basin, USA. Int J Coal Geol 76:34–45CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hamady M, Lozupone C, Knight R (2010) Fast UniFrac: facilitating high-throughput phylogenetic analyses of microbial communities including analysis of pyrosequencing and PhyloChip data. ISME J 4:17–27PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Head IM, Jones DM, Larter SR (2003) Biological activity in the deep subsurface and the origin of heavy oil. Nature 426:344–352PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Huse S, Huber J, Morrison H, Sogin M, Welch D (2007) Accuracy and quality of massively parallel DNA pyrosequencing. Genome Biol 8(7):R143PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Huson DH, Auch AF, Qi J, Schuster SC (2007a) MEGAN analysis of metagenomic data. Genome Res 17:377–386PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huson DH, Richter DC, Rausch C, Dezulian T, Franz M, Rupp R (2007b) Dendroscope: An interactive viewer for large phylogenetic trees. BMC Bioinformatics 8(1):460PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Kang Z, Yeung A, Foght JM, Gray MR (2008) Hydrophobic bacteria at the hexadecane–water interface: examination of micrometre-scale interfacial properties. Colloid Surface B 67:59–66CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kendall M (1938) A new measure of rank correlation. Biometrica 30(1–2):81–89Google Scholar
  27. Lai MC, Chen SC, Shu CM, Chiou MS, Wang CC, Chuang MJ, Hong TY, Liu CC, Lai LJ, Hua JJ (2002) Methanocalculus taiwanensis sp. nov., isolated from an estuarine environment. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 52:1799–1806PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Lai MC, Lin CC, Yu PH, Huang YF, Chen SC (2004) Methanocalculus chunghsingensis sp. nov., isolated from an estuary and a marine fishpond in Taiwan. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:183–189PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lai Q, Yuan J, Wu C, Shao Z (2009) Oceanibaculum indicum gen. nov., sp. nov., isolated from deep seawater of the Indian Ocean. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:1733–1737PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Li Q, Kang C, Wang H, Liu C, Zhang C (2002) Application of microbial enhanced oil recovery technique to Daqing oil field. Biochem Eng J 11:197–199CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Liang Q, Lloyd-Jones G (2010) Sphingobium scionense sp. nov., an aromatic hydrocarbon-degrading bacterium isolated from contaminated sawmill soil. Int J Syst Evol Micr 60:413–416CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lomans BP, Maas R, Luderer R, Op den Camp HJM, Pol A, van der Drift C, Vogels GD (1999) Isolation and characterization of Methanomethylovorans hollandica gen nov, sp nov, isolated from freshwater sediment, a methylotrophic methanogen able to grow on dimethyl sulfide and methanethiol. Appl Environ Microbiol 65(8):3641–3650PubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Lozupone C, Knight R (2005) UniFrac: a new phylogenetic method for comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microbiol 71:8228–8235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Marmur J (1961) A procedure for the isolation of deoxyribonucleic acid from microorganisms. J Mol Biol 3:208–218CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McInerney MJ, Nagle DP, Knapp RM (2005) Microbially enhanced oil recovery: past, present, and future. In: Ollivier B, Magot M (eds) Petroleum microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, pp 215–237Google Scholar
  36. Mikucki JA, Liu Y, Delwiche M, Colwell FS, Boone DR (2003) Isolation of a methanogen from deep marine sediments that contain methane hydrates and description of Methanoculleus submarinus sp nov. Appl Environ Microbiol 69(6):3311–3316PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Planckaert M (2005) Oil reservoirs and oil production. In: Ollivier B, Magot M (eds) Petroleum microbiology. ASM Press, Washington, pp 3–19Google Scholar
  38. Pruesse E, Quast C, Knittel K, Fuchs B, Ludwig W, Peplies J, Glöckner FO (2007) SILVA: a comprehensive online resource for quality checked and aligned ribosomal RNA sequence data compatible with ARB. Nucleic Acids Res 35:7188–7196PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Reinhold-Hurek B, Hurek T (2006) The Genera Azoarcus, Azovibrio, Azospira and Azonexus. In: Dworkin M, Falkow S, Rosenberg E, Schleifer K-H, Stackebrandt E (eds) The Prokaryotes, vol 5. Springer, New York, pp 873–891CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Rosenberg M (2006) Microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons: twenty-five years of doing MATH. FEMS Microbiol Lett 262:129–134PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rosenberg M, Gutnick D, Rosenberg E (1980) Adherence of bacteria to hydrocarbons: a simple method for measuring cell-surface hydrophobicity. FEMS Microbiol Lett 9:29–33CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schloss PD, Westcott SL (2011) Assessing and improving methods used in operational taxonomic unit-based approaches for 16S rRNA gene sequence analysis. Appl Environ Microb 77(10):3219–3226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Schloss PD, Westcott SL, Ryabin T et al (2009) Introducing Mothur: open-source, platform-independent, community-supported software for describing and comparing microbial communities. Appl Environ Microb 75:7537–7541CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Tan T, Wang B, Shao Z (2009) Donghicola xiamenensis sp. nov., a marine bacterium isolated from seawater of the Taiwan Strait in China. Int J Syst Evol Micr 59:1143–1147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Teramoto M, Suzuki M, Hatmanti A, Harayama S (2010) The potential of Cycloclasticus and Altererythrobacter strains for use in bioremediation of petroleum-aromatic-contaminated tropical marine environments. J Biosci Bioeng 110(1):48–52PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Van der Mei HC, Van de Belt-Gritter B, Busscher HJ (1995) Implications of microbial adhesion to hydrocarbons for evaluating cell surface hydrophobicity. Colloids Surf B 5:117–126CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Voordouw G, Grigoryan AA, Lambo A et al (2009) Sulfide remediation by pulsed injection of nitrate into a low temperature Canadian heavy oil reservoir. Environ Sci Technol 43(24):9512–9518PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Yakimov MM, Genovese M, Denaro R (2010) Thalassolituus. In: Timmis KN (ed) Handbook of hydrocarbon and lipid microbiology. Springer, Berlin, pp 1765–1772CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Youssef N, Simpson DR, Duncan KE, McInerney MJ, Folmsbee M, Fincher T, Knapp RM (2007) In situ biosurfactant production by Bacillus strains injected into a limestone petroleum reservoir. Appl Environ Microb 73(4):1239–1247CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yue JC, Clayton MK (2005) A similarity measure based on species proportions. Commun Stat A -Theor 34:2123–2131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zengler K, Richnow HH, Rosselló-Mora R, Michaelis W, Widdel F (1999) Methane formation from long-chain alkanes by anaerobic microorganisms. Nature 401:266–269PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Zhang X, Yue S, Zhong H, Hua W, Chen R, Cao Y, Zhao L (2011) A diverse bacterial community in an anoxic quinoline-degrading bioreactor determined by using pyrosequencing and clone library analysis. Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 91:425–434PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Zhao H-P, Wang L, Ren J-R, Li Z, Li M, Gao H-W (2008) Isolation and characterization of phenanthrene-degrading strains Sphingomonas sp. ZP1 and Tistrella sp. ZP5. J Hazard Mater 152:1293–1300PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zoueki CW, Ghoshal S, Tufenkji N (2010) Bacterial adhesion to hydrocarbons: role of asphaltenes and resins. Colloids Surf B 79:219–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Yuriy Kryachko
    • 1
  • Xiaoli Dong
    • 2
  • Christoph W. Sensen
    • 2
  • Gerrit Voordouw
    • 1
  1. 1.Petroleum Microbiology Research Group, Department of Biological SciencesUniversity of CalgaryCalgary, ABCanada
  2. 2.Visual Genomics Centre, Faculty of MedicineUniversity of CalgaryCalgary, ABCanada

Personalised recommendations