Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 101, Issue 1, pp 105–124

Molecular signatures (conserved indels) in protein sequences that are specific for the order Pasteurellales and distinguish two of its main clades

Original Paper


The members of the order Pasteurellales are currently distinguished primarily on the basis of their branching in the rRNA trees and no convincing biochemical or molecular markers are known that distinguish them from all other bacteria. The genome sequences for 20 Pasteurellaceae species/strains are now publicly available. We report here detailed analyses of protein sequences from these genomes to identify conserved signature indels (CSIs) that are specific for either all Pasteurellales or its major clades. We describe more than 23 CSIs in widely distributed genes/proteins that are uniquely shared by all sequenced Pasteurellaceae species/strains but are not found in any other bacteria. Twenty-one additional CSIs are also specific for the Pasteurellales except in some of these cases homologues were not detected in a few species or the CSI was also present in an isolated non-Pasteurellaceae species. The sequenced Pasteurellaceae species formed two distinct clades in a phylogenetic tree based upon concatenated sequences for 10 conserved proteins. The first of these clades consisting of Aggregatibacter,Pasteurella,Actinobacillus succinogenes, Mannheimia succiniciproducens, Haemophilus influenzae and Haemophilus somnus was also independently supported by 13 uniquely shared CSIs that are not present in other Pasteurellaceae species or other bacteria. Another clade consisting of the remaining Pasteurellaceae species (viz. Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae, Actinobacillus minor,Haemophilus ducryi, Mannheimia haemolytica and Haemophilus parasuis) was also strongly and independently supported by nine CSIs that are uniquely present in these bacteria. The order Pasteurellales is presently made up of a single family, Pasteurellaceae, that encompasses all of its genera. In this context, our identification of two distinct clades within the Pasteurellales, which are supported by both phylogenetic analyses and by multiple highly specific molecular markers, strongly argues for and provides potential means for the division of various genera from this order into a minimum of two families. The genetic changes responsible for these CSIs were likely introduced in the common ancestors of either all Pasteurellales or of these two specific clades. These CSIs provide novel means for the identification and circumscription of these groups of Pasteurellales in molecular terms.


Conserved indels Pasteurellales taxonomy and systematics Pasteurellales clades Phylogenetic analyses Pasteurellaceae genomes Comparative genomics Molecular markers for Pasteurellales Lateral gene transfers 

Supplementary material

10482_2011_9628_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (1.7 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1705 kb)


  1. Barabote RD, Xie G, Leu DH et al (2009) Complete genome of the cellulolytic thermophile Acidothermus cellulolyticus 11B provides insights into its ecophysiological and evolutionary adaptations. Genome Res 19:1033–1043PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bisgaard M (1993) Ecology and significance of Pasteurellaceae in animals. Zentralbl Bakteriol 279:7–26PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bonaventura MP, Lee EK, DeSalle R, Planet PJ (2010) A whole-genome phylogeny of the family Pasteurellaceae. Mol Phylogenet Evol 54:950–956PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bosse JT, Janson H, Sheehan BJ et al (2002) Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae: pathobiology and pathogenesis of infection. Microbes Infect 4:225–235PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Castresana J (2000) Selection of conserved blocks from multiple alignments for their use in phylogenetic analysis. Mol Biol Evol 17:540–552PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Chen C, Kittichotirat W, Si Y, Bumgarner R (2009) Genome sequence of Aggregatibacter actinomycetemcomitans serotype c strain D11S-1. J Bacteriol 191:7378–7379PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Christensen H, Bisgaard M (2006) The genus Pasteurella. In: Dworkin M (ed) The prokaryotes: a handbook on the biology of bacteria. New York, Springer, pp 1062–1090Google Scholar
  8. Christensen H, Bisgaard M (2010) Molecular classification and its impact on diagnostics and understanding the phylogeny and epidemiology of selected members of Pasteurellaceae of veterinary importance. Berl Munch Tierarztl Wochenschr 123:20–30PubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Christensen H, Kuhnert P, Olsen JE, Bisgaard M (2004) Comparative phylogenies of the housekeeping genes atpD, infB and rpoB and the 16S rRNA gene within the Pasteurellaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1601–1609PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christensen H, Kuhnert P, Busse HJ, Frederiksen WC, Bisgaard M (2007) Proposed minimal standards for the description of genera, species and subspecies of the Pasteurellaceae. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 57:166–178PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ciccarelli FD, Doerks T, von Mering C, Creevey CJ, Snel B, Bork P (2006) Toward automatic reconstruction of a highly resolved tree of life. Science 311:1283–1287PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Ley J, Mannheim W, Mutters R et al (1990) Inter- and intrafamilial similarities of rRNA cistrons of the Pasteurellaceae. Int J Syst Bacteriol 40:126–137PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Dewhirst FE, Paster BJ, Olsen I, Fraser GJ (1992) Phylogeny of 54 representative strains of species in the family Pasteurellaceae as determined by comparison of 16S rRNA sequences. J Bacteriol 174:2002–2013PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Dewhirst FE, Paster BJ, Olsen I, Fraser GJ (1993) Phylogeny of the Pasteurellaceae as determined by comparison of 16S ribosomal ribonucleic acid sequences. Zentralbl Bakteriol 279:35–44PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Di Bonaventura MP, DeSalle R, Pop M et al (2009) Complete genome sequence of Aggregatibacter (Haemophilus) aphrophilus NJ8700. J Bacteriol 191:4693–4694PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleischmann RD, Adams MD, White O et al (1995) Whole-genome random sequencing and assembly of Haemophilus influenzae Rd. Science 269:496–512PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Foote SJ, Bosse JT, Bouevitch AB, Langford PR, Young NM, Nash JH (2008) The complete genome sequence of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae L20 (serotype 5b). J Bacteriol 190:1495–1496PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gao B, Gupta RS (2005) Conserved indels in protein sequences that are characteristic of the phylum Actinobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 55:2401–2412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gao B, Mohan R, Gupta RS (2009) Phylogenomics and protein signatures elucidating the evolutionary relationships among the Gammaproteobacteria. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:234–247PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Gioia J, Qin X, Jiang H et al (2006) The genome sequence of Mannheimia haemolytica A1: insights into virulence, natural competence, and Pasteurellaceae phylogeny. J Bacteriol 188:7257–7266PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Gogarten JP, Doolittle WF, Lawrence JG (2002) Prokaryotic evolution in light of gene transfer. Mol Biol Evol 19:2226–2238PubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Griffiths E, Gupta RS (2002) Protein signatures distinctive of chlamydial species: horizontal transfer of cell wall biosynthesis genes glmU from Archaebacteria to Chlamydiae, and murA between Chlamydiae and Streptomyces. Microbiology 148:2541–2549PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Griffiths E, Gupta RS (2006) Molecular signatures in protein sequences that are characteristics of the Phylum Aquificales. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 56:99–107PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gupta RS (1998) Protein phylogenies and signature sequences: a reappraisal of evolutionary relationships among archaebacteria, eubacteria, and eukaryotes. Microbiol Mol Biol Rev 62:1435–1491PubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Gupta RS (2000) The phylogeny of proteobacteria: relationships to other eubacterial phyla and eukaryotes. FEMS Microbiol Rev 24:367–402PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Gupta RS (2005) Protein signatures distinctive of alpha proteobacteria and its subgroups and a model for alpha proteobacterial evolution. Crit Rev Microbiol 31:135CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Gupta RS (2006) Molecular signatures (unique proteins and conserved indels) that are specific for the epsilon proteobacteria (Campylobacterales). BMC Genomics 7:167PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gupta RS (2009) Protein signatures (molecular synapomorphies) that are distinctive characteristics of the major cyanobacterial clades. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 59:2510–2526PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Gupta RS (2010) Molecular signatures for the main phyla of photosynthetic bacteria and their subgroups. Photosynth Res 104:357–372PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gupta RS, Griffiths E (2006) Chlamydiae-specific proteins and indels: novel tools for studies. Trends Microbiol 14:527–535PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Gupta RS, Mathews DW (2010) Signature proteins for the major clades of cyanobacteria. BMC Evol Biol 10:24PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Gupta RS, Mok A (2007) Phylogenomics and signature proteins for the alpha proteobacteria and its main groups. BMC Microbiol 7:106PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Harris JK, Kelley ST, Spiegelman GB, Pace NR (2003) The genetic core of the universal ancestor. Genome Res 13:407–412PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Harrison A, Dyer DW, Gillaspy A et al (2005) Genomic sequence of an otitis media isolate of nontypeable Haemophilus influenzae: comparative study with H. influenzae serotype d, strain KW20. J Bacteriol 187:4627–4636PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hayashimoto N, Ueno M, Tkakura A, Itoh T (2007) Biochemical characterization and phylogenetic analysis based on 16S rRNA sequences for V-factor dependent members of Pasteurellaceae derived from laboratory rats. Curr Microbiol 54:419–423PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hogg JS, Hu FZ, Janto B et al (2007) Characterization and modeling of the Haemophilus influenzae core and supragenomes based on the complete genomic sequences of Rd and 12 clinical nontypeable strains. Genome Biol 8:R103PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hong SH, Kim JS, Lee SY et al (2004) The genome sequence of the capnophilic rumen bacterium Mannheimia succiniciproducens. Nat Biotechnol 22:1275–1281PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jeanmougin F, Thompson JD, Gouy M, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1998) Multiple sequence alignment with Clustal x. Trends Biochem Sci 23:403–405PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kainz A, Lubitz W, Busse HJ (2000) Genomic fingerprints, ARDRA profiles and quinone systems for classification of Pasteurella sensu stricto. Syst Appl Microbiol 23:494–503PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Korczak B, Christensen H, Emler S, Frey J, Kuhnert P (2004) Phylogeny of the family Pasteurellaceae based on rpoB sequences. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol 54:1393–1399PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kuhnert P, Korczak BM (2006) Prediction of whole-genome DNA–DNA similarity, determination of G+C content and phylogenetic analysis within the family Pasteurellaceae by multilocus sequence analysis (MLSA). Microbiology 152:2537–2548PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. May BJ, Zhang Q, Li LL, Paustian ML, Whittam TS, Kapur V (2001) Complete genomic sequence of Pasteurella multocida, Pm70. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 98:3460–3465PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Mutters R, Mannheim W, Bisgaard M (1989) Taxonomy of the group. In: Adam C, Rutter JM (eds) Pasteurella and Pasteurellosis. Academic Press, London, pp 3–34Google Scholar
  44. Olsen I (1993) Recent approaches to the chemotaxonomy of the Actinobacillus-Haemophilus-Pasteurella group (family Pasteurellaceae). Oral Microbiol Immunol 8:327–336PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Olsen I, Dewhirst FE, Paster BJ, Busse HJ (2005) Family I. Pasteurellaceae Phol 1981b, 382VP (Effective Publication: Pohl 1979, 81). In: Brenner DJ, Krieg NR, Staley JT, Garrity GM (eds) Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology: the proteobacteria, part B: the gammaproteobacteria, 2nd edn. Springer, New York, pp 851–856Google Scholar
  46. Paster BJ, Russell JB, Yang CM, Chow JM, Woese CR, Tanner R (1993) Phylogeny of the ammonia-producing ruminal bacteria Peptostreptococcus anaerobius, Clostridium sticklandii, and Clostridium aminophilum sp. nov. Int J Syst Bacteriol 43:107–110PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Pohl S (1981) DNA relatedness among members of Haemophilus, Pasteurella and Actinobacillus. In: Kilian M, Frederiksen W, Bilberstein EL (eds) Haemophilus, pasteurella and actinobacillus. Academic Press, London, pp 245–253Google Scholar
  48. Redfield RJ, Findlay WA, Bosse J, Kroll JS, Cameron AD, Nash JH (2006) Evolution of competence and DNA uptake specificity in the Pasteurellaceae. BMC Evol Biol 6:82PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rokas A, Holland PW (2000) Rare genomic changes as a tool for phylogenetics. Trends Ecol Evol 15:454–459PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rokas A, Williams BL, King N, Carroll SB (2003) Genome-scale approaches to resolving incongruence in molecular phylogenies. Nature 425:798–804PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shah HN, Olsen I, Bernard K, Finegold SM, Gharbia SE, Gupta RS (2009) Approaches to the study of the systematics of anaerobic, Gram-negative, non-spore-forming rods: current status and perspectives. Anaerobe 15:179–194PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Singh B, Gupta RS (2009) Conserved inserts in the Hsp60 (GroEL) and Hsp70 (DnaK) proteins are essential for cellular growth. Mol Genet Genomics 281:361–373PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Spinola SM, Bauer ME, Munson RS Jr (2002) Immunopathogenesis of Haemophilus ducreyi infection (chancroid). Infect Immun 70:1667–1676PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Takatsuka Y, Chen C, Nikaido H (2010) Mechanism of recognition of compounds of diverse structures by the multidrug efflux pump AcrB of Escherichia coli. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 107:6559–6565PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Van de Peer Y, De Wachter R (1994) TREECON for Windows: a software package for the construction and drawing of evolutionary trees for the Microsoft Windows environment. Comput Appl Biosci 10:569–570PubMedGoogle Scholar
  56. Williams KP, Gillespie JJ, Sobral BW et al (2010) Phylogeny of gammaproteobacteria. J Bacteriol 192:2305–2314PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wu D, Hugenholtz P, Mavromatis K et al (2009) A phylogeny-driven genomic encyclopaedia of bacteria and archaea. Nature 462:1056–1060PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Xu Z, Zhou Y, Li L et al (2008) Genome biology of Actinobacillus pleuropneumoniae JL03, an isolate of serotype 3 prevalent in China. PLoS One 3:e1450PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Yue M, Yang F, Yang J et al (2009) Complete genome sequence of Haemophilus parasuis SH0165. J Bacteriol 191:1359–1360PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Biochemistry and Biomedical SciencesMcMaster UniversityHamiltonCanada

Personalised recommendations