Antonie van Leeuwenhoek

, Volume 93, Issue 4, pp 335–346 | Cite as

The implication of life style on codon usage patterns and predicted highly expressed genes for three Frankia genomes

  • Arnab Sen
  • Saubashya Sur
  • Asim K. Bothra
  • David R. Benson
  • Philippe Normand
  • Louis S. Tisa
Original Paper

Abstract

Frankia are nitrogen-fixing actinomycetes that form a symbiotic association with over 200 species of woody dicotyledonous plants. Recently, three Frankia genomes were completely sequenced. In this study, the synonymous codon usage patterns of three Frankia genomes (strains CcI3, ACN14a, and EAN1pec) were determined and compared to each other and to other actinobacteria. As expected for a high G+C organism, codon usage by Frankia was highly biased, but differences were observed among the three strains. Using the codon adaptation index (CAI) as a numerical estimator of gene expression level, highly expressed genes in Frankia were predicted with ribosomal protein genes as a reference. The analysis of the predicted highly expressed genes showed that Frankia strain CcI3 had a different profile from the other two strains. Strain CcI3 had fewer predicted highly expressed genes in several COG categories including lipid transport and metabolism, secondary metabolites biosynthesis, inorganic ion transport and metabolism, and general function prediction only than Frankia strains EAN1pec and ACN14a. Interestingly, Frankia EAN1pec had more predicted highly expressed genes in transcription and signal transduction mechanisms than the other two strains. These differences were not just a reflection in total gene numbers, but also based on percentage of genes within a category. These results support the hypothesis that strain CcI3 is becoming a symbiotic specialist and the other two facultative symbiotic strains are maintaining their capacity to exist as free-living soil dwellers.

Keywords

Actinorhizal symbiosis Frankia Codon bias Correspondence analysis Gene expression Nitrogen fixation Predicted highly expressed genes 

Abbreviations

COG

Clusters of orthologous groups of proteins

CDS

Protein coding sequences

CAI

Codon adaptation index

Supplementary material

10482_2007_9211_MOESM1_ESM.xls (108 kb)
(XLS 109 kb)
10482_2007_9211_MOESM3_ESM.xls (120 kb)
(XLS 121 kb)

References

  1. Banerjee T, Basak S, Gupta SK, Ghosh TC (2004) Evolutionary forces in shaping codon and amino acid usages in Blochmannia floridanus. J Biomol Struct Dyn 22:13–23PubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Benson DR, Dawson JO (2007) Recent advances in the biogeography and genecology of symbiotic Frankia and its host plants. Physiol Plant 130:318–330CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Benson DR, Silvester WB (1993) Biology of Frankia strains, actinomycete symbionts of actinorhizal plants. Microbiol Rev 57:293–319PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Bentley SD, Chater KF, Cerdeno-Tarraga AM, Challis GL, Thomson NR, James KD, Harris DE, Quail MA, Kieser H, Harper D, Bateman A, Brown S, Chandra G, Chen CW, Collins M, Cronin A, Fraser A, Goble A, Hidalgo J, Hornsby T, Howarth S, Huang CH, Kieser T, Larke L, Murphy L, Oliver K, O’Neil S, Rabbinowitsch E, Rajandream MA, Rutherford K, Rutter S, Seeger K, Saunders D, Sharp S, Squares R, Squares S, Taylor K, Warren T, Wietzorrek A, Woodward J, Barrell BG, Parkhill J, Hopwood DA (2002) Complete genome sequence of the model actinomycete Streptomyces coelicolor A3(2). Nature 417:141–147PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cameron J, Aguadé M (1998) An evaluation of measures of synonymous codon usage bias. J Mol Evol 47:268–274CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Dos Reis M, Wernisch L, Savva R (2003) Unexpected correlations between gene expression and codon usage bias from microarray data for the whole Escherichia coli K-12 genome. Nucleic Acids Res 31:6976–6985PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ghosh TC, Gupta SK, Majumdar S (2000) Studies on codon usage in Entamoeba histolytica. Int J Parasitol 30:715–722PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Grantham R, Gautier C, Gouy M, Jacobzone M, Mercier R (1981) Codon catalog usage is a genome strategy modulated for gene expressivity. Nucleic Acids Res 9:r43–r74PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Greenacre MJ (1984) Theory and applications of correspondence analysis. Academic Press, LondonGoogle Scholar
  10. Huss-Danell K (1997) Actinorhizal symbioses and their N2 fixation. Tansley Review No. 93. New Phytol 136:375–405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Ikemura T (1981) Correlation between the abundance of Escherichia coli transfer RNAs and the occurrence of the respective codons in its protein genes. J Mol Biol 146:1–21PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Ikemura T (1985) Codon usage and t-RNA content in unicellular and multicellular organisms. Mol Biol Evol 2:13–34PubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Jansen R, Bussemaker HJ, Gerstein M (2003) Revisiting the codon adaptation index from a whole-genome perspective: analyzing the relationship between gene expression and codon occurrence in yeast using a variety of models. Nucleic Acids Res 31:2242–2251PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Karlin S, Mrazek J (2000) Predicted highly expressed genes of diverse prokaryotic genomes. J Bacteriol 182:5238–5250PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Karlin S, Mrazek J, Campbell A, Kaiser D (2001) Characterizations of highly expressed genes of four fast-growing bacteria. J Bacteriol 183:5025–5040PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Knight RD, Freeland SJ, Landweber LF (2001) A simple model based on mutation and selection explains trends in codon and amino-acid usage and GC composition within and across genomes. Genome Biol 2(4):research0010.1–0010.13; doi: 10.1186/gb-2001-2-4- research0010
  17. Lafay B, Atherton JC, Sharp PM (2000) Absence of translationally selected synonymous codon usage bias in Helicobacter pylori. Microbiology 146:851–860PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Markowitz VM, Ivanova N, Palaniappan K, Szeto E, Korzeniewski F, Lykidis A, Anderson I, Mavrommatis K, Kunin V, Garcia Martin H, Dubchak I, Hugenholtz P, Kyrpides NC (2006) An experimental metagenome data management and analysis system. Bioinformatics 22:e359–e367PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Martin-Galiano AJ, Wells JM, de la Campa AG (2004) Relationship between codon biased genes, microarray expression values and physiological characteristics of Streptococcus pneumoniae. Microbiology 150:2313–2325PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Normand P, Lapierre P, Tisa LS, Gogarten JP, Alloisio N, Bagnarol E, Bassi CA, Berry AM, Bickhart DM, Choisne N, Couloux A, Cournoyer B, Cruveiller S, Daubin V, Demange N, Francino MP, Goltsman E, Huang Y, Kopp OR, Labarre L, Lapidus A, Lavire C, Marechal J, Martinez M, Mastronunzio JE, Mullin BC, Niemann J, Tania PP, Zoe Rouy R, Schenowitz C, Sellstedt A, Tavares F, Tomkins JP, Vallenet D, Valverde C, Wall LG, Wang Y, Medigue SC, Benson DR (2007) Genome characteristics of facultative symbiotic Frankia sp. strains reflect host range and host plant biogeography. Genome Res 7:7–15Google Scholar
  21. Peden J (1999) Analysis of codon usage. PhD thesis, The University of Nottingham, UKGoogle Scholar
  22. Sellstedt A (1995) Specificity and effectivity in nodulation by Frankia on southern hemisphere actinorhiza. FEMS Microbiol Lett 125:231–236PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Sharp PM, Li WH (1986) An evolutionary perspective on synonymous codon usage in unicellular organisms. J Mol Evol 24:28–38PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Sharp PM, Li WH (1987) The codon adaptation index – a measure of directional synonymous codon usage bias, and its potential applications. Nucleic Acids Res 15:1281–1295PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Simonet P, Navarro E, Rouvier C, Reddell P, Zimpfer J, Dommergues Y, Bardin R, Combarro P, Hamelin J, Domenach AM, Gourbiere F, Prin Y, Dawson J, Normand P (1999) Co-evolution between Frankia populations and host plants in the family Casuarinaceae and consequent patterns of global dispersal. Environ Microbiol 1:525–533PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Sur S, Sen A, Bothra AK (2006) Codon usage profiling and analysis of intergenic association of Frankia EuIK1 nif genes. Ind J Microbiol 46:363–369Google Scholar
  27. Wall LG (2000) The actinorhizal symbiosis. J Plant Growth Regul 19:167–182PubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Wright F (1990) The effective number of codons used in a gene. Gene 87:23–29PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Wu G, Culley DE, Zhang W (2005a) Predicted highly expressed genes in the genomes of Streptomyces coelicolor and Streptomyces avermitilis and the implications for their metabolism. Microbiology 151:2175–2187PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Wu G, Nie L, Zhang W (2005b) Predicted highly expressed genes in Nocardia farcinica and the implication for its primary metabolism and nocardial virulence. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek 89:135–146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Zimpfer JF, Smyth CA, Dawson JO (1997) The capacity of Jamaican mine spoils, agricultural and forest soils to nodulate Myrica cerifera, Leucaena leucocephala and Casuarina cunninghamiana. Physiol Plant 99:664–672CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  • Arnab Sen
    • 1
    • 2
  • Saubashya Sur
    • 2
  • Asim K. Bothra
    • 3
  • David R. Benson
    • 4
  • Philippe Normand
    • 5
  • Louis S. Tisa
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of MicrobiologyUniversity of New HampshireDurhamUSA
  2. 2.Department of BotanyUniversity of North BengalSiliguriIndia
  3. 3.Raiganj University CollegeRaiganjIndia
  4. 4.Department of Cellular and Molecular BiologyUniversity of ConnecticutStorrsUSA
  5. 5.Ecologie Microbienne, UMR CNRS 5557Université Lyon IVilleurbanne CedexFrance

Personalised recommendations