Advertisement

Leagile supplier selection in Chinese textile industries: a DEMATEL approach

  • Yongbo Li
  • Ali Diabat
  • Chung-Cheng LuEmail author
Original Research
  • 55 Downloads

Abstract

Industries across the globe are under growing pressure to rethink and redesign their supply chain operations to maintain their competitive advantage. The supplier selection process in supply chain management holds a pivotal position in its exploration of new strategies to stay competitive in global markets. This study considers supplier selection with two different strategic perspectives, including lean and agile. Selecting suppliers based on their leagile practices helps the focal industries to make their supply chain operations healthier, especially if the focal industry is a major supplier of multinational companies. China is considered as a case context in this study with the application of textile sectors since this country occupies the top position with regard to exports. The common criteria involved in leagile supplier selection were collected from existing literature resources and were fine-tuned with insights from field experts. Further, the case industrial managers also assisted with the evaluation of the influential criteria for the leagile supplier selection process. Based on the replies and the assistance of a decision-making trial and evaluation laboratory tool, the most influential criterion and interdependencies among other criteria were identified. This study helps industrial managers to evaluate their suppliers based on the resultant influential criterion and, further, it strengthens the global supply chains with agility and robustness.

Keywords

Leagile Supplier selection China Textile sector DEMATEL 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The work is supported by the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, Grant number:19CX04011B, China University of Petroleum(East China)

References

  1. Abdel-Basset, M., Manogaran, G., Gamal, A., & Smarandache, F. (2018). A hybrid approach of neutrosophic sets and DEMATEL method for developing supplier selection criteria. Design Automation for Embedded Systems,22, 257–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdollahi, M., Arvan, M., & Razmi, J. (2015). An integrated approach for supplier portfolio selection: lean or agile? Expert Systems with Applications,42(1), 679–690.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Agarwal, A., Shankar, R., & Tiwari, M. K. (2006). Modeling the metrics of lean, agile and leagile supply chain: An ANP-based approach. European Journal of Operational Research,173(1), 211–225.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alimardani, M., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Aghdaie, M. H., & Tamošaitienė, J. (2013). A novel hybrid SWARA and VIKOR methodology for supplier selection in an agile environment. Technological and Economic Development of Economy,19(3), 533–548.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Alimardani, M., Rabbani, M., & Rafiei, H. (2014). A novel hybrid model based on DEMATEL, ANP and TOPSIS for supplier selection in agile supply chains. International Journal of Services and Operations Management,18(2), 179–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. AlKahtani, M., Rehman, A. U., Al-Zabidi, A., & Choudhary, A. (2019). Agile supply chain assessment: An empirical study on concepts, research and issues. Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering,44(3), 2551–2565.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Ambe, I. M. (2017). Strategies of light vehicle manufacturers in South Africa based on supply chain decision drivers. International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, 9(3), 188–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Amir, F. (2011). Significance of lean, agile and leagile decoupling point in supply chain management. Journal of Economics and Behavioral Studies,3(5), 287–295.Google Scholar
  9. Asree, S., Cherikh, M., & Gopalan, S. (2018). The impact of supply chain responsiveness and strategic supply chain collaboration on innovation performance. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 10(2), 131–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bathrinath, S., Charan, V. S., Ponnambalam, S. G., & Saravanasankar, S. (2019). Identification and evaluation of criteria of agile manufacturing using DEMATEL: A case from an indian metal fabrication industry. Journal of Modern Manufacturing Systems and Technology,2(1), 61–74.Google Scholar
  11. Beikkhakhian, Y., Javanmardi, M., Karbasian, M., & Khayambashi, B. (2015). The application of ISM model in evaluating agile suppliers selection criteria and ranking suppliers using fuzzy TOPSIS-AHP methods. Expert systems with Applications, 42(15–16), 6224–6236.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Birgün Barla, S. (2003). A case study of supplier selection for lean supply by using a mathematical model. Logistics Information Management,16(6), 451–459.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Çalık, A., Paksoy, T., & Huber, S. (2019). Lean and green supplier selection problem: A novel multi objective linear programming model for an electronics board manufacturing company in Turkey. In Multiple criteria decision making and aiding (pp. 281–309). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  14. Chowdary, B. V., & Fullerton, C. (2019). Improvement of steel melting operations at a Caribbean company: a lean manufacturing approach. International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, 11(1–2), 102–125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chun Wu, Y. (2003). Lean manufacturing: A perspective of lean suppliers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management,23(11), 1349–1376.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ciccullo, F., Pero, M., Caridi, M., Gosling, J., & Purvis, L. (2018). Integrating the environmental and social sustainability pillars into the lean and agile supply chain management paradigms: A literature review and future research directions. Journal of Cleaner Production,172, 2336–2350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ding, H., Fu, Y., Zheng, L., & Yan, Z. (2019). Determinants of the competitive advantage of dairy supply chains: Evidence from the Chinese dairy industry. International Journal of Production Economics,209, 360–373.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Elkins, D. A., Huang, N., & Alden, J. M. (2004). Agile manufacturing systems in the automotive industry. International Journal of Production Economics, 91(3), 201–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. El-Mokedam, M. (2017). The classification of supplier selection criteria with respect to lean or agile manufacturing strategies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management,28(2), 232–249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Elshaer, I. A., & Augustyn, M. M. (2016). Direct effects of quality management on competitive advantage. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management,33(9), 1286–1310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldsby, T. J., Griffis, S. E., & Roath, A. S. (2006). Modeling lean, agile, and leagile supply chain strategies. Journal of Business Logistics,27(1), 57–80.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Haq, A. N., & Boddu, V. (2017). Analysis of enablers for the implementation of leagile supply chain management using an integrated fuzzy QFD approach. Journal of Intelligent Manufacturing,28(1), 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hasan, M. A., Shankar, R., & Sarkis, J. (2008). Supplier selection in an agile manufacturing environment using data envelopment analysis and analytical network process. International Journal of Logistics Systems and Management,4(5), 523–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Hsu, C. H., Wang, F. K., & Tzeng, G. H. (2012). The best vendor selection for conducting the recycled material based on a hybrid MCDM model combining DANP with VIKOR. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 66, 95–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Iyengar, V., & Bharathi, S. V. (2018). Bibliometric analysis of lean, agile, and leagile supply chains in automobile industry (1990–2017). International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM),11(3), 22–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Kumar, A., & Dash, M. K. (2016). Using DEMATEL to construct influential network relation map of consumer decision-making in e-marketplace. International Journal of Business Information Systems,21(1), 48–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Kumar, R., & Kumar, V. (2017). Application of interpretive structural modelling approach for the analysis of barriers affecting lean manufacturing implementation in Indian manufacturing industry. International Journal of Business Performance and Supply Chain Modelling, 9(1), 1–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kumar, A., Pal, A., Vohra, A., Gupta, S., Manchanda, S., & Dash, M. K. (2018). Construction of capital procurement decision making model to optimize supplier selection using Fuzzy Delphi and AHP-DEMATEL. Benchmarking: An International Journal,25(5), 1528–1547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Liu, T., Deng, Y., & Chan, F. (2018). Evidential supplier selection based on DEMATEL and game theory. International Journal of Fuzzy Systems,20(4), 1321–1333.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lotfi, M. (2019). Which practices are lean, agile and resilient? Literature review and practitioners' perspective. International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, 11(1–2), 142–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Luo, X., Wu, C., Rosenberg, D., & Barnes, D. (2009). Supplier selection in agile supply chains: An information-processing model and an illustration. Journal of Purchasing and Supply Management,15(4), 249–262.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Maharaja, R., Devadasan, S. R., Sakthivel, M., & Murugesh, R. (2018). Performance measurement of the leagile supply chain. International Journal of Services and Operations Management,31(3), 396–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., & Towill, D. R. (2000a). Engineering the leagile supply chain. International Journal of Agile Management Systems,2(1), 54–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Mason-Jones, R., Naylor, B., & Towill, D. R. (2000b). Lean, agile or leagile? Matching your supply chain to the marketplace. International Journal of Production Research,38(17), 4061–4070.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mason-Jones, R., & Towill, D. R. (1999). Total cycle time compression and the agile supply chain. International journal of production economics, 62(1–2), 61–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Manzouri, M., Ab Rahman, M. N., & Arshad, H. (2015). Issues in supply chain implementation: A comparative perspective. International Journal of Information Systems and Supply Chain Management (IJISSCM), 8(1), 85–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Naylor, J. B., Naim, M. M., & Berry, D. (1999). Leagility: Integrating the lean and agile manufacturing paradigms in the total supply chain. International Journal of production economics, 62(1–2), 107–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Parkouhi, S. V., Ghadikolaei, A. S., & Lajimi, H. F. (2019). Resilient supplier selection and segmentation in grey environment. Journal of Cleaner Production,207, 1123–1137.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Powell, T. C. (1995). Total quality management as competitive advantage: A review and empirical study. Strategic Management Journal,16(1), 15–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Qrunfleh, S., & Tarafdar, M. (2013). Lean and agile supply chain strategies and supply chain responsiveness: The role of strategic supplier partnership and postponement. Supply Chain Management: An International Journal,18(6), 571–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rahiminezhad Galankashi, M., & Helmi, S. A. (2016). Assessment of hybrid lean-agile (leagile) supply chain strategies. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management,27(4), 470–482.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ramana, D., Rao, K., & Kumar, J. (2013). Evaluation of performance metrics of leagile supply chain through fuzzy MCDM. Decision science letters,2(3), 211–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Soni, G., & Kodali, R. (2009). Performance value analysis for the justification of the leagile supply chain. International Journal of Business Performance Management,11(1–2), 96–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Soni, G., & Kodali, R. (2012). Evaluating reliability and validity of lean, agile and leagile supply chain constructs in Indian manufacturing industry. Production Planning & Control,23(10–11), 864–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Suifan, T., Alazab, M., & Alhyari, S. (2019). Trade-off among lean, agile, resilient and green paradigms: an empirical study on pharmaceutical industry in Jordan using a TOPSIS-entropy method. International Journal of Advanced Operations Management, 11(1–2), 69–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Torğul, B., & Paksoy, T. (2019). A new multi objective linear programming model for lean and green supplier selection with fuzzy TOPSIS. In Lean and green supply chain management (pp. 101–141). Cham: Springer.Google Scholar
  47. Wu, C., & Barnes, D. (2009). A model for continuous improvement in supplier selection in agile supply chains. Knowledge and Process Management,16(3), 85–110.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wu, C., & Barnes, D. (2014). Partner selection in agile supply chains: A fuzzy intelligent approach. Production Planning & Control,25(10), 821–839.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Wu, C., Barnes, D., Rosenberg, D., & Luo, X. (2009). An analytic network process-mixed integer multi-objective programming model for partner selection in agile supply chains. Production Planning and Control,20(3), 254–275.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Yu, M. C., Goh, M., & Lin, H. C. (2012). Fuzzy multi-objective vendor selection under lean procurement. European Journal of Operational Research,219(2), 305–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Zhang, Y., Wang, Y., & Wu, L. (2012). Research on demand-driven leagile supply chain operation model: A simulation based on anylogic in system engineering. Systems Engineering Procedia,3, 249–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementChina University of Petroleum (East China)QingdaoPeople’s Republic of China
  2. 2.Division of EngineeringNew York University Abu DhabiAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates
  3. 3.Department of Civil and Urban Engineering, Tandon School of EngineeringNew York UniversityBrooklynUSA
  4. 4.Department of Transportation and Logistics ManagementNational Chiao Tung UniversityHsinchuTaiwan

Personalised recommendations