Advertisement

Is third-party remanufacturing necessarily harmful to the original equipment manufacturer?

  • Chang FangEmail author
  • Zhuangzhuang You
  • Yudou Yang
  • Duomei Chen
  • Samar Mukhopadhyay
S.I.: RealCaseOR
  • 32 Downloads

Abstract

Conventional wisdom suggests that competition from a third-party remanufacturer lowers the original equipment manufacturer (OEM)’s profits. In this paper, we show that this may not hold for the remanufacturing competition when the presence of remanufactured products affects the consumers’ perceived value of new products. We introduce two new effects of remanufacturing: (1) third-party remanufacturer (TPR)’s remanufactured products shift the consumer valuation of new products upward, and (2) OEM’s remanufactured products shift the valuation downward. By comparing two alternatives of OEM, i.e., take part in remanufacturing or not, we demonstrate a new benefit of TPR competition. It helps the OEM to exploit the valuation of new product customers. Our results suggest that taking part in remanufacturing does not necessarily benefit an OEM. When TPR remanufactured products have low impact on consumers’ perceived value of new products, and only if the remanufacturing cost is sufficiently low, it is profitable for an OEM to engage in remanufacturing. Otherwise, remanufacturing may reduce profits for the OEM and in this case, the OEM should leave remanufacturing to the TPR. Therefore, facing with TPR competition, understanding the interactions between remanufacturing and perceived value of new products is important to an OEM. In addition, we find that low fraction of used products is not always bad for the TPR, and a high willingness-to-pay for the OEM’s remanufactured products may be harmful for the OEM.

Keywords

Remanufacturing Third-party competition Consumers’ perceived value Stackelberg game 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71801005), the Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (Nos. 1808085QG227, 1608085MG152), the Innovation Project for Oversea Scholars (2019LCX007), and the Social Sciences Foundation of Anhui Province (No. AHSKQ2016D28).

Supplementary material

10479_2019_3445_MOESM1_ESM.docx (603 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 603 kb)

References

  1. Agrawal, V. V., Atasu, A., & van Ittersum, K. (2015). Remanufacturing, third-party competition, and consumers’ perceived value of new products. Management Science, 61(1), 60–72.Google Scholar
  2. Agrawal, V. V., Ferguson, M., & Souza, G. C. (2016). Trade-in rebates for price discrimination and product recovery. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 63(3), 326–339.Google Scholar
  3. Atasu, A., Guide, V. D. R., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2010). Sowhat if remanufacturing cannibalizes my new product sales? California Management Review, 52(2), 56–76.Google Scholar
  4. Atasu, A., Sarvary, M., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2008). Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. Management Science, 54(10), 1731–1746.Google Scholar
  5. Basak, D. (2017). Cournot vs. Bertrand under centralised bargaining. Economics Letters, 154, 124–127.Google Scholar
  6. Chen, L. T., & Wei, C. C. (2012). Multi-period channel coordination in vendor-managed inventory for deteriorating goods. International Journal of Production Research, 50(16), 4396–4413.Google Scholar
  7. Cisco. (2009). Cisco Refresh: Get the value of Cisco Products at significant savings with fully certified remanufactured equipment. https://www.cisco.com/c/en/us/products/remanufactured.html.
  8. Dastidar, K. G. (1997). Comparing Cournot and Bertrand in a homogeneous product market. Journal of Economic Theory, 75, 205–212.Google Scholar
  9. Debo, L. G., Toktay, L. B., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2005). Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Science, 51(8), 1193–1205.Google Scholar
  10. Esenduran, G., Kemahlıoglu-Ziya, E., & Swaminathan, J. M. (2017). Impact of take-back regulation on the remanufacturing industry. Production and Operations Management, 26(5), 924–944.Google Scholar
  11. Ferguson, M. E., & Toktay, B. (2006). The effect of competition on recovery strategies. Production and Operations Management, 15(3), 351–368.Google Scholar
  12. Ferrer, G. (1997). The economics of tire remanufacturing. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 19, 221–255.Google Scholar
  13. Ferrer, G., & Swaminathan, J. (2006). Managing new and remanufactured products. Management Science, 52(1), 15–26.Google Scholar
  14. Ferrer, G., & Swaminathan, J. (2010). Managing new and differentiated remanufactured products. European Journal of Operational Research, 203(1), 370–379.Google Scholar
  15. Giuntini, R., & Gaudette, K. (2003). Remanufacturing: The next great opportunity for boosting US productivity. Business Horizons, 46(6), 41–48.Google Scholar
  16. Guide, V. D. R. (2000). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: Industry practice and research needs. Journal of Operations Management, 18(4), 467–483.Google Scholar
  17. Guide, V. D. R., & Li, J. (2010). The potential for cannibalization of new products sales by remanufactured products. Decision Sciences, 41(3), 547–572.Google Scholar
  18. Guide, V. D. R., Muyldermans, L., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2005). Hewlett-Packard company unlocks the value potential from time sensitive returns. Interfaces, 35(4), 281–293.Google Scholar
  19. Hackner, J. (2000). A note on price and quantity competition in differentiated oligopolies. Journal of Economic Theory, 93, 233–239.Google Scholar
  20. Hauser, W. M., & Lund, R. T. (2008). Remanufacturing, operating practices and strategies: Perspectives on the management of remanufacturing businesses in the United States. Research report, Boston University, Boston.Google Scholar
  21. Heese, H. S., Cattani, K., Ferrer, G., Gilland, W., & Roth, A. V. (2005). Competitive advantage through take-back of used products. European Journal of Operational Research, 164(1), 143–157.Google Scholar
  22. Hewlett-Packard. (2014). Ink and toner cartridges. Retrieved from November 24, 2014, http://www8.hp.com/us/en/ads/supplies/overview.html.
  23. Kim, C. K., Lavack, A. M., & Smith, M. J. (2001). Consumer evaluation of vertical brand extensions and core brands. Journal of Business Research, 52(3), 211–222.Google Scholar
  24. Majumder, P., & Groenevelt, H. (2001). Competition in remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 125–141.Google Scholar
  25. Mussweiler, T. (2003). Comparison processes in social judgment: Mechanisms and consequences. Psychological Review, 110(3), 472–489.Google Scholar
  26. Örsdemir, A., Kemahlıoğlu-Ziya, E., & Parlaktürk, A. K. (2014). Competitive quality choice and remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 23(1), 48–64.Google Scholar
  27. Ovchinnikov, A. (2011). Revenue and cost management for remanufactured products. Production and Operations Management, 20(6), 824–840.Google Scholar
  28. Rozanova, O. (2017). Wholesale prices and Cournot–Bertrand competition. Bulletin of Economic Research, 69(4), E12–E18.Google Scholar
  29. Seyedesfahani, M. M., Biazaran, M., & Gharakhani, M. (2011). A game theoretic approach to coordinate pricing and vertical co-op advertising in manufacturer–retailer supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 211(2), 263–273.Google Scholar
  30. Singh, N., & Vives, X. (1984). Price and quantity competition in a differentiated duopoly. Rand Journal of Economics, 15(4), 546–554.Google Scholar
  31. Souza, G. (2013). Closed-loop supply chains: A critical review, and future research. Decision Science, 44(1), 7–38.Google Scholar
  32. Subramanian, R., & Subramanyam, R. (2008). Key drivers in the market for remanufactured products: Empirical evidence from eBay. Retrieved from December 1, 2008, https://ssrn.com/abstract=1320719.
  33. Vorasayan, J., & Ryan, S. M. (2006). Optimal price and quantity of refurbished products. Production and Operations Management, 15(3), 369–383.Google Scholar
  34. Wang, L., Cai, G., Tsay, A. A., & Vakharia, A. J. (2017). Design of the reverse channel for remanufacturing: Must profit-maximization harm the environment? Production and Operations Management, 26(8), 1585–1603.Google Scholar
  35. Webster, S., & Mitra, S. (2007). Competitive strategy in remanufacturing and the impact of take-back laws. Journal of Operations Management, 25, 1123–1140.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementAnHui Normal UniversityWuhuChina
  2. 2.Lubar School of BusinessUniversity of Wisconsin-MilwaukeeMilwaukeeUSA

Personalised recommendations