Advertisement

Internal hedging of intermittent renewable power generation and optimal portfolio selection

  • Carlo LucheroniEmail author
  • Carlo Mari
S.I.: Recent Developments in Financial Modeling and Risk Management
  • 13 Downloads

Abstract

This paper introduces a scheme for hedging and managing production costs of a risky generation portfolio, initially assumed to be dispatchable, to which intermittent electricity generation from non-dispatchable renewable sources like wind is further added. The proposed hedging mechanism is based on fixing the total production level in advance, then compensating any unpredictable non-dispatchable production with a matching reduction of the dispatchable fossil fuel production. This means making no recourse to short term techniques like financial hedging or storage, in a way fully internal to the portfolio itself. Optimization is obtained in the frame of the stochastic LCOE theory, in which fuel costs and \(\hbox {CO}_2\) prices are included as uncertainty sources besides intermittency, and in which long term production cost risk, proxied either by LCOE standard deviation and LCOE CVaR Deviation, is minimized. Closed form solutions for optimal hedging strategies under both risk measures are provided. Main economic consequences are discussed. For example, this scheme can be seen as a method for optimally including intermittent renewable sources in an otherwise dispatchable generation portfolio under a long term capacity expansion perspective. Moreover, within this hedging scheme, (1) production cost risk is reduced and optimized as a consequence of the substitution of the dispatchable fossil fuel generation with non-dispatchable \(\hbox {CO}_2\) free generation, and (2) generation costs can be reduced if the intermittent generation can be partially predicted.

Keywords

Levelized cost of electricity Renewable energy Intermittency risk hedging Risk and deviation measures Generation portfolios 

Notes

References

  1. Chen, H. (2017). Power grid operation in a market environment: Economic efficiency and risk mitigation. Wiley-IEEE Press.Google Scholar
  2. Clements, A. E., Hurn, A. S., & Li, Z. (2016). Strategic bidding and rebidding in electricity markets. Energy Economics, 59, 24–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. DeLlano-Paz, F., Calvo-Silvosa, A., Iglesias, S., & Soares, I. (2017). Energy planning and modern portfolio theory: A review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 77, 636–651.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Du, Y., & Parsons, J. E. (2009). Update on the cost of nuclear power. In MIT working paper.Google Scholar
  5. EIA. (2016). Levelized cost and levelized avoided cost of new generation resources in the annual energy outlook 2016. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  6. EIA. (2016). Annual energy outlook 2016. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  7. EIA. (2016). Capital cost estimates for utility scale electricity generating plants. U.S. Energy Information Administration, Department of Energy.Google Scholar
  8. European Commission. (2010). Designing appropriate obligations and penalties. Bruxelles, Belgium: Capacity Mechanism Working Group.Google Scholar
  9. Feng, Z. H., Zou, L. L., & Wei, Y. M. (2011). Carbon price volatility: Evidence from EU ETS. Applied Energy, 88, 590–598.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. García-Martos, C., Rodríguez, J., & Sánchez, M. J. (2013). Modelling and forecasting fossil fuels, CO\(_{2}\) and electricity and their volatilities. Applied Energy, 101, 363–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hadjipaschalis, I., & Poullikkas, A. (2009). Overview of current and future energy storage technologies for electric power applications. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13, 1513–1522.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hittinger, E., Whitacre, J. F., & Apt, J. (2010). Compensating for wind variability using co-located natural gas generation and energy storage. Energy Systems, 1, 417–439.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Hodge, B.-M., et al. (2012). Wind power forecasting error distributions: An international comparison. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.Google Scholar
  14. Hogue, M. T. (2012). A review of the costs of nuclear power generation. BEBR, University of Utah.Google Scholar
  15. IEA. (2016). IEA Wind—2015 annual report. International Energy Agency.Google Scholar
  16. IEA-NEA. (2015). Projected costs of generating electricity. Paris, France: OECD.Google Scholar
  17. Joskow, P. L. (2011). Comparing the costs of intermittent and dispatchable electricity generating technologies. American Economic Review, 101, 238–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Jung, J., & Broadwater, R. P. (2014). Current status and future advances for wind speed and power forecasting. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 31, 762–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Kagiannas, A. G., Askounis, D. T., & Psarras, J. (2004). Power generation planning: A survey from monopoly to competition. Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 26, 413–421.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Krokhml, P., Palmquist, J., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Portfolio optimization with conditional value-at-risk: Objective and constraints. The Journal of Risk, 4, 3–68.Google Scholar
  21. Lazard. (2015). Lazard’s levelized cost of storage analysis—version 1.0.Google Scholar
  22. Lucheroni, C., Boland, J., & Ragno, C. (2019). Scenario generation and probabilistic forecasting analysis of spatio-temporal wind speed series with multivariate autoregressive volatility models. Applied Energy, 239, 1226–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Lucheroni, C., & Mari, C. (2017). CO\(_{2}\) volatility impact on energy portfolio choice: A fully stochastic LCOE theory analysis. Applied Energy, 190, 278–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Lucheroni, C., & Mari, C. (2018). Risk shaping of optimal electricity portfolios in the stochastic LCOE theory. Computers and Operations Research, 96, 374–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Lucheroni, C., & Mari, C. (2018). Optimal integration of intermittent renewables: A system LCOE stochastic approach. Energies 11.Google Scholar
  26. Lujano-Rojas, J. M., Osório, G. J., Matias, J. C. O., & Catalão, J. P. S. (2016). Wind power forecasting error distributions and probabilistic load dispatch. Boston: IEEE - Power and Energy Society General Meeting.Google Scholar
  27. Madureira, N. L. (2014). Key concepts in energy. London: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Mari, C. (2014). Hedging electricity price volatility using nuclear power. Applied Energy, 113, 615–621.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Markowitz, H. (1952). Porfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 77, 77–91.Google Scholar
  30. MIT. (2003). The future of nuclear power. USA: Cambridge.Google Scholar
  31. NREL. (2012). Renewable electricity futures study. National Renewable Energy Laboratory.Google Scholar
  32. Reichelstein, S., & Sahoo, A. (2015). Time of day pricing and the levelized cost of intermittent power generation. Energy Economics, 48, 97–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Rockafellar, R. T., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. The Journal of Risk, 2, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Ross, S. A., Westerfield, R. W., & Jaffe, J. (2010). Corporate finance. NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  35. Roy, S. (2016). Uncertainty of optimal generation cost due to integration of renewable energy sources. Energy Systems, 7, 365–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Stacy, T. F., & Taylor, G. (2015). The levelized cost of electricity from existing generation resources. Washington, DC: Institute for Energy Research.Google Scholar
  37. Taylor, G., & Tanton, T. (2012). The hidden costs of wind electricity. American Tradition Institute.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Science and TechnologiesUniversity of CamerinoCamerinoItaly
  2. 2.Department of EconomicsUniversity of Chieti - PescaraPescaraItaly

Personalised recommendations