Advertisement

A second-order cone programming based robust data envelopment analysis model for the new-energy vehicle industry

  • Chao Lu
  • Jie TaoEmail author
  • Qiuxian An
  • Xiaodong Lai
Original - OR Modeling/Case Study
  • 22 Downloads

Abstract

The validity of performance evaluation is determined by, and therefore greatly influenced by, the accuracy of data set. To address such imprecise and negative data problems widely spread in the real world, this paper proposes a second-order cone based robust data envelopment analysis (SOCPR-DEA) model, which is more robust to data variety. Further, this new computational tractable model is applied to analyze 13 new-energy vehicle (NEV) manufacturers from China. The findings support that the SOCPR-DEA model could well mitigate the deficiency caused by data variety, and the evidence from Chinese NEV industry shows that a focus strategy is more likely to enhance a firm’s efficiency especially at its emerging stage, and the efficiency is more sensitive with production cost than other factors such as research and development, sales income, earnings per share, and predicted income. In addition, this paper also gives some industrial implications and policy suggestions based on these interesting findings.

Keywords

New-energy vehicle industry Efficiency Robust data envelopment analysis model Data variety Conic programming 

Notes

References

  1. Aparicio, J., Mahlberg, B., Pastor, J. T., & Sahoo, B. K. (2014). Decomposing technical inefficiency using the principle of least action. European Journal of Operational Research, 239(3), 776–785.Google Scholar
  2. Ben-Tal, A., El Ghaoui, L., & Nemirovski, A. (2009). Robust optimization (Vol. 28). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Ben-Tal, A., & Nemirovski, A. (1998). Robust convex optimization. Mathematics of Operations Research, 23(4), 769–805.Google Scholar
  4. Ben-Tal, A., & Nemirovski, A. (1999). Robust solutions of uncertain linear programs. Operations Research Letters, 25(1), 1–13.Google Scholar
  5. Bertsimas, D., & Sim, M. (2004). The price of robustness. Operations Research, 52(1), 35–53.Google Scholar
  6. Boyd, S., & Vandenberghe, L. (2004). Convex Optimization. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  7. Chambers, R. G., Chung, Y., & Färe, R. (1998). Profit, directional distance functions, and Nerlovian efficiency. Journal of Optimization Theory and Applications, 98(2), 351–364.Google Scholar
  8. Charnes, A., Cooper, W. W., & Rhodes, E. (1978). Measuring the efficiency of decision making units. European Journal of Operational Research, 2(6), 429–444.Google Scholar
  9. Chen, W., Gai, Y., & Gupta, P. (2018). Efficiency evaluation of fuzzy portfolio in different risk measures via DEA. Annals of Operations Research, 269(1–2), 103–127.Google Scholar
  10. Chen, K., & Zhu, J. (2019). Computational tractability of chance constrained data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 274(3), 1037–1046.Google Scholar
  11. Cooper, W. W., Thompson, R. G., & Thrall, R. M. (1996). Introduction: Extensions and new developments in DEA. Annals of Operations Research, 66(1), 1–45.Google Scholar
  12. El Ghaoui, L., & Lebret, H. (1997). Robust solutions to least-squares problems with uncertain data. SIAM Journal on Matrix Analysis and Applications, 18(4), 1035–1064.Google Scholar
  13. Emrouznejad, A., & Gl, Y. (2018). A survey and analysis of the first 40 years of scholarly literature in dea: 1978–2016. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 61, 4–8.Google Scholar
  14. Estellita Lins, M., Angulo-Meza, L., & Moreira da Silva, A. (2004). A multi-objective approach to determine alternative targets in data envelopment analysis. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 55(10), 1090–1101.Google Scholar
  15. Gharakhani, M., Kazemi, I., & Haji, H. (2011). A robust dea model for measuring the relative efficiency of Iranian high schools. Management Science Letters, 1(3), 389–404.Google Scholar
  16. Laguna, M. (1998). Applying robust optimization to capacity expansion of one location in telecommunications with demand uncertainty. Management Science, 44(11–part–2), S101–S110.Google Scholar
  17. Lee, A. H., Lin, C. Y., Kang, H. Y., & Lee, W. H. (2012). An integrated performance evaluation model for the photovoltaics industry. Energies, 5(4), 1271–1291.Google Scholar
  18. Leung, S., Wu, Y., & Lai, K. (2002). A robust optimization model for a cross-border logistics problem with fleet composition in an uncertain environment. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 36(11–13), 1221–1234.Google Scholar
  19. Liu, W., Tao, M., & Zhao, X. (2018). Application of user research method based on user experience in new energy vehicle innovation. Automobile Parts, 3, 43–46. (In Chinese).Google Scholar
  20. Liu, Y., & Kokko, A. (2013). Who does what in Chinas new energy vehicle industry? Energy Policy, 57, 21–29.Google Scholar
  21. Lu, C., Liu, H. C., Tao, J., Rong, K., & Hsieh, Y. C. (2017). A key stakeholder-based financial subsidy stimulation for Chinese EV industrialization: A system dynamics simulation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 118, 1–14.Google Scholar
  22. Lu, C., Rong, K., You, J., & Shi, Y. (2014). Business ecosystem and stakeholders’ role transformation: Evidence from Chinese emerging electric vehicle industry. Expert Systems with Applications, 41(10), 4579–4595.Google Scholar
  23. Malcolm, S. A., & Zenios, S. A. (1994). Robust optimization for power systems capacity expansion under uncertainty. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 45(9), 1040–1049.Google Scholar
  24. Mulvey, J. M., Vanderbei, R. J., & Zenios, S. A. (1995). Robust optimization of large-scale systems. Operations Research, 43(2), 264–281.Google Scholar
  25. Omrani, H., Shafaat, K., & Emrouznejad, A. (2018). An integrated fuzzy clustering cooperative game data envelopment analysis model with application in hospital efficiency. Expert Systems with Applications, 114, 615–628.Google Scholar
  26. Sadjadi, S., & Omrani, H. (2008). Data envelopment analysis with uncertain data: An application for Iranian electricity distribution companies. Energy Policy, 36(11), 4247–4254.Google Scholar
  27. Shokouhi, A. H., Hatami-Marbini, A., Tavana, M., & Saati, S. (2010). A robust optimization approach for imprecise data envelopment analysis. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 59(3), 387–397.Google Scholar
  28. Soyster, A. L. (1973). Convex programming with set-inclusive constraints and applications to inexact linear programming. Operations Research, 21(5), 1154–1157.Google Scholar
  29. Sueyoshi, T., Yuan, Y., & Goto, M. (2017). A literature study for dea applied to energy and environment. Energy Economics, 62, 104–124.Google Scholar
  30. Talluri, S., Narasimhan, R., & Nair, A. (2006). Vendor performance with supply risk: A chance-constrained dea approach. International Journal of Production Economics, 100(2), 212–222.Google Scholar
  31. Tone, K. (2001). A slacks-based measure of efficiency in data envelopment analysis. European Journal of Operational Research, 130(3), 498–509.Google Scholar
  32. Tone, K., & Tsutsui, M. (2010). Dynamic DEA: A slacks-based measure approach. Omega, 38(3–4), 145–156.Google Scholar
  33. Vassiadou, Z. C., & Zenios, S. A. (1996). Robust optimization models for managing callable bond portfolios. European Journal of Operational Research, 91(2), 264–273.Google Scholar
  34. Wen, M. (2015). Uncertain data envelopment analysis. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  35. Yan, H., & Wei, Q. (2011). Data envelopment analysis classification machine. Information Sciences, 181(22), 5029–5041.Google Scholar
  36. You, Y. Q., & Jie, T. (2016). A study of the operation efficiency and cost performance indices of power-supply companies in China based on a dynamic network slacks-based measure model. Omega, 60, 85–97.Google Scholar
  37. Yu, C. S., & Li, H. L. (2000). A robust optimization model for stochastic logistic problems. International Journal of Production Economics, 64(1–3), 385–397.Google Scholar
  38. Zhang, L., & Qin, Q. (2018). China’s new energy vehicle policies: Evolution, comparison and recommendation. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 110, 57–72.Google Scholar
  39. Zhou, Z., Lin, L., Xiao, H., Ma, C., & Wu, S. (2017). Stochastic network DEA models for two-stage systems under the centralized control organization mechanism. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 110, 404–412.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of ManagementShanghai UniversityShanghaiChina
  2. 2.Business SchoolUniversity of Shanghai for Science and TechnologyShanghaiChina
  3. 3.School of BusinessNorth China Electric Power UniversityBeijingChina
  4. 4.School of Economic and ManagementSouth China Normal UniversityGuangzhouChina

Personalised recommendations