Advertisement

A multistage risk-averse stochastic programming model for personal savings accrual: the evidence from Lithuania

  • Audrius KabašinskasEmail author
  • Francesca Maggioni
  • Kristina Šutienė
  • Eimutis Valakevičius
Original Research

Abstract

In this paper we consider the problem of choosing the optimal pension fund in the second pillar of Lithuanian pension system by providing some guidelines to individuals with defined contribution pension plans. A multistage risk-averse stochastic optimization model is proposed that can be used to plan a long-term pension accrual under two different cases: minimum and maximum accumulation plans as possible options in the system. The investment strategy of personal savings is based on the optimal solutions over possible scenario realizations generated for a particular participant. The concept of the risk-averse decision-maker is implemented by choosing the conditional value at risk as the risk measure defined by a nested formulation that guarantees the time consistency in the multistage model. The paper focuses on three important decision-making moments corresponding to the duration of periods to be modelled. The first period is a short-term accumulation, while the second period is a long-term accumulation with possibly high deviation of objective function value. The third period is designed to implement the concept of target date fund in the second pillar pension scheme as the subsequent need to protect against potential losses at risky pension funds. The experimental findings of this research provide insights for individuals as decision-makers to select pension funds, as well as for policy-makers by revealing the vulnerability of pension system.

Keywords

Pension system modeling Multistage stochastic integer programming Alpha-stable distribution Time consistency CVaR Target date funds 

Mathematics Subject Classification

91B28 90C15 60E07 91B30 

References

  1. Aidukaite, J. (2011). Welfare reforms and socio-economic trends in the ten new EU member states of Central and Eastern Europe. Communist Post-Communist Studies, 44(3), 211–219.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ailliot, P., & Monbet, V. (2012). Markov-switching autoregressive models for wind time series. Environmental Modelling & Software, 30, 92–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Armonaite, G. (2012). Theoretical and practical aspects of assets and liabilities management in Lithuanian pension funds. http://archive.ism.lt/handle/1/263. Accessed June 01, 2016.
  4. Bank of Lithuania. (2013). Reviews of Lithuania’s 2nd and 3rd pillar pension funds and of the market of collective investment undertakings. https://www.lb.lt/en/publications/review-of-lithuania-s-2nd-and-3rd-pillar-pension-funds-and-of-the-market-of-collective-investment-undertakings-2013. Accessed May 26, 2016.
  5. Bank of Lithuania. (2014). Reviews of Lithuania’s 2nd and 3rd pillar pension funds and of the market of collective investment undertakings. https://www.lb.lt/en/publications/reviews-of-lithuania-s-2nd-and-3rd-pillar-pension-funds-and-of-the-market-of-collective-investment-undertakings-2014. Accessed May 26, 2016.
  6. Bank of Lithuania. (2015). Reviews of Lithuania’s 2nd and 3rd pillar pension funds and of the market of collective investment undertakings. https://www.lb.lt/en/publications/review-of-lithuania-s-2nd-and-3rd-pillar-pension-funds-and-of-the-market-of-collective-investment-undertakings-2015. Accessed May 26, 2016.
  7. Birge, J., & Louveaux, F. (2011). Introduction to stochastic programming. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bitinas, A. (2011). Modern pension system reforms in Lithuania: Impact of crisis and ageing. Jurispridencija, 18(3), 1055–1080.Google Scholar
  9. Bitinas, A., & Maccioni, A. (2013). Lithuanian pension systems reforms following demographic and social transitions. http://crenos.unica.it/crenos/sites/default/files/WP13-15_0.pdf. Accessed June 01, 2016.
  10. Bitinas, A., & Maccioni, A. (2014). Lithuanian pension system’s reforms transformations and forecasts. Universal Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 2(1), 13–23.Google Scholar
  11. Blake, D., Wright, D., & Zhang, Y. (2014). Age dependent investing: Optimal funding and investment strategies in defined contribution pension plans when members are rational life cycle financial planners. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 38, 105–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chybalski, F. (2015). The choice of open pension fund made by citizens of Poland in the year 2003–2009: The analysis of the criteria. https://www.econbiz.de/Record/the-choice-of-open-pension-fund-made-by-citizens-of-poland-in-the-years-2003-2009-the-analysis-of-the-criteria-chybalski-filip/10008904670. Accessed 05 June, 2016.
  13. Cobbe, H. (2014). Target date funds: Will the UK follow the American Revolution. Professional Investor (October 2014). Journal of the CFA Society of the UK. Elston Research Series. https://view.joomag.com/elston-research-series/0172454001413204307
  14. Consigli, G., & Dempster, M. (1998). Dynamic stochastic programmingfor asset-liability management. Annals of Operations Research, 81, 131–162.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1018992620909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Consiglio, A., Cocco, F., & Zenios, S. A. (2007). Scenario optimization asset and liability modelling for individual investors. Annals of Operations Research, 152, 167–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Dupačová, J., Consigli, G., & Wallace, S. (2000). Scenarios for multistage stochastic programs. Annals of Operations Research, 100(1), 25–53.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1019206915174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dupačová, J., & Polívka, J. (2009). Asset-liability management for Czech pension funds using stochastic programming. Annals of Operations Research, 165(1), 5–28.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-008-0358-6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Eeckhoudt, L., & Hansen, P. (1992). Mean-preserving changes in risk with tail-dominance. Theory and Decision, 1(33), 23–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gavrilova, I. (2011). The evaluation of mutual fund performance in Lithuania considering risk and timing ability. Business in XXI Century, 3(4), 5–12.Google Scholar
  20. Gokçen, U., & Yalçin, A. (2015). The case against active pension funds: Evidence from the Turkish private pension system. Emerging Markets Review, 23, 46–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Goldfeld, S., & Quantd, R. (2005). A Markov model for switching regression. Journal of Econometrics, 135, 349–376.Google Scholar
  22. Gudaitis, T., & Maccioni, A. F. (2014). Optimal individual choice of contribution to second pillar pension system in Lithuania. https://ideas.repec.org/p/cns/cnscwp/201402.html. Accessed May 23, 2016.
  23. Gudaitis, T., & Medaiskis, T. (2013). Was the participation in second pillar successful in Lithuania? In Atiner’s conference paper series Athens. Athens Institute for Education and Research.Google Scholar
  24. Hammond, B. (2015). Target date funds: The good, the bad, and the unknown. Forbes (June 2015). Forbes Media LLC. https://www.forbes.com/sites/pensionresearchcouncil/2015/07/29/target-date-funds-the-good-the-bad-and-the-unknown/#3c93c2fa400a
  25. Homem-de Mello, T., & Pagnoncelli, B. K. (2016). Risk aversion in multistage stochastic programming: A modeling and algorithmic perspective. European Journal of Operational Research, 249(1), 188–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jackowicz, K., & Kowalewski, O. (2012). Crisis, internal governance mechanisms and pension fund performance: Evidence from Poland. Emerging Markets Review, 13(4), 493–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Jurevičiene, D., & Samoškaite, Š. (2012). Evaluation of pillar II pension funds return on investment considering risk. Business: Theory and Practice, 13(4), 304–313.Google Scholar
  28. Kabašinskas, A., Rachev, S., Sakalauskas, L., Sun, W., & Belovas, I. (2010). Stable mixture model with dependent states for financial return series exhibiting short histories and periods of strong passivity. Computational Analysis and Applications, 12(1), 268–292.Google Scholar
  29. Kabašinskas, A., Sakalauskas, L., Sun, W., & Belovas, I. (2012). Mixed-stable models for analyzing high-frequency financial data. Journal of Computational Analysis and Applications, 14(7), 1210–1226.Google Scholar
  30. Kaut, M., & Wallace, S. W. (2007). Evaluation of scenario-generation methods for stochastic programming. Pacific Journal of Optimization, 3, 257–271.Google Scholar
  31. Konicz, A., Pisinger, D., Rasmussen, K. M., & Steffensen, M. (2015). A combined stochastic programming and optimal control approach to personal finance and pensions. OR Spectrum, 37(3), 583–616.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Konicz, A. K., & Mulvey, J. M. (2015). Optimal savings management for individuals with defined contribution pension plans. European Journal of Operational Research, 243(1), 233–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Laun, T., & Wallenius, J. (2015). A life cycle model of health and retirement: The case of Swedish pension reform. Journal of Public Economics, 127, 127–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Liutvinavičius, M., & Sakalauskas, V. (2011). Research of factors affecting pension funds efficiency. Social Technologies, 1(2), 328–343.Google Scholar
  35. Maggioni, F., Allevi, E., & Bertocchi, M. (2014). Bounds in multistage linear stochastic programming. Journal of Optimization, Theory and Applications, 163(1), 200–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Maggioni, F., Allevi, E., & Bertocchi, M. (2016). Monotonic bounds in multistage mixed-integer stochastic programming. Computational Management Science, 13(3), 423–457.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10287-016-0254-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Maggioni, F., & Pflug, G. (2016). Bounds and approximations for multistage stochastic programs. SIAM Journal on Optimization, 26(1), 831–855.  https://doi.org/10.1137/140971889.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Maggioni, F., & Wallace, S. (2012). Analyzing the quality of the expected value solution in stochastic programming. Annals of Operations Research, 200(1), 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Medaiskis, T., & Gudaitis, T. (2013). Assessing the impact of second pillar component on old age pension in Lithuania. Ekonomika, 92(4), 54–72.Google Scholar
  40. Medaiskis, T., & Jankauskiene, D. (2014). Pensions, health and long-term care. Lithuania. http://ec.europa.eu/social/BlobServlet?docId=12972&langId=en. Accessed June 02, 2016.
  41. Mladen, L. (2012). A comparative review over the pension systems performance in Central and Eastern European countries. Journal of Knowledge Management, Economics and Information Technology, 5, 11.Google Scholar
  42. Novickyte, L., Rabikauskaite, V., & Pedroja, G. (2016). Social security issues: II pillar pension funds performance in Lithuania. Journal of Security and Sustainability Issues, 5(3), 329–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. OECD. (2013). Pensions at a glance 2013: OECD and g20 indicators. http://www.oecd.org/pensions/public-pensions/OECDPensionsAtAGlance2013.pdf. Accessed May 24, 2016.
  44. Pension Funds Online. (2016). Lithuania. http://www.pensionfundsonline.co.uk/content/country-profiles/lithuania/87. Accessed May 23, 2016.
  45. Philpott, A. B., & de Matos, V. L. (2012). Dynamic sampling algorithms for multi-stage stochastic programs with risk aversion. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(2), 470–483.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.10.056.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Rabikauskaite, V., & Novickyte, L. (2015). II pillar pension funds: How the selection of fund influences the size of the old-age pension. Ekonomika, 94(3), 96–118.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Rajevska, O. (2015). Sustainability of pension systems in the Baltic states. Entrepreneurial Business and Economics Review, 3(4), 139–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rockafellar, R., & Uryasev, S. (2000). Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. Journal of Risk, 2, 21–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Rockafellar, R., & Uryasev, S. (2002). Conditional value-at-risk for general loss distributions. Journal of Banking and Finance, 26, 1443–1471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Rudloff, B., Street, A., & Vallad, D. M. (2014). Time consistency and risk averse dynamic decision models: Definition, interpretation and practical consequences. European Journal of Operational Research, 234(3), 743–750.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.11.037.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Ruszczyński, A. (2010). Risk-averse dynamic programming for Markov decision processes. Mathematical Programming, 125(2), 235–261.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10107-010-0393-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Ruszczynski, A., & Shapiro, A. (2006). Conditional risk mappings. Mathematics of Operations Research, 31(3), 544–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Samorodnitsky, G., & Taqqu, M. (2000). Stable non-Gaussian random processes, stochastic models with infinite variance. New York: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
  54. Seimas of the Republic of Lithuania. (2010). Law on reform of the pension system. http://www3.lrs.lt/pls/inter3/dokpaieska.showdoc_e?p_id=382018&p_tr2=2, reg. num. IX-1215.
  55. Shapiro, A. (2012). Time consistency of dynamic risk measures. Operations Research Letters, 40(6), 436–439.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.orl.2012.08.007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Skučiene, D. (2011). Kaupiamuju pensiju schemos dalyviu elgsenos tendencijos lietuvoje. Filosofija Sociologija, 22(2), 226–235.Google Scholar
  57. Šutiene, K., Kabašinskas, A., Strebeika, D., Kopa, M., & Reichardt, R. (2014). Estimation of VaR and CVaR from financial data using simulated alpha-stable random variables. In Proceedings of the 28th European simulation and modelling conference, FEUP, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.Google Scholar
  58. Šutiene, K., Makackas, A., & Pranevicius, H. (2010). Multistage k-means clustering for scenario tree construction. Informatica, 21(1), 123–138.Google Scholar
  59. Thomas, A., Spataro, L., & Mathew, N. (2014). Pension funds and stock market volatility: An empirical analysis of OECD countries. Journal of Financial Stability, 11, 92–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Velculescu, D. (2011). Pension reforms in emerging Europe: The uncertain road ahead. http://www.ebrd.com/downloads/research/news/4441347_-_Pension_Reforms_in_Emerging_Europe_The_Uncertain_Road_Ahead_(D.Velculescu)_-_1_-_DMSDR1S.pdf. Accessed June 02, 2016.
  61. Volskis, E. (2012). Reforms of Baltic states pension systems: Challenges and benefits. http://www.ebrd.com/downloads/news/pension-system.pdf. Accessed June 02, 2016.
  62. Yoon, Y. (2010). Glide path and dynamic asset allocation of target date funds. Journal of Asset Management, 11, 346–360.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Zochowski, D., & Bialowolski, P. (2011). Modelling inflation using Markov switching models: Case of Poland. Prace i Materiay, 86, 185–199.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Mathematical ModelingKaunas University of TechnologyKaunasLithuania
  2. 2.Department of Management, Economics and Quantitative MethodsUniversity of BergamoBergamoItaly

Personalised recommendations