Stochastic multi-site supply chain planning in textile and apparel industry under demand and price uncertainties with risk aversion
- 127 Downloads
A multi-product, multi-period, multi-site supply chain production and transportation planning problem, in the textile and apparel industry, under demand and price uncertainties is considered in this paper. The problem is formulated using a two-stage stochastic programming model taking into account the production amount, the inventory and backorder levels as well as the amounts of products to be transported between the different plants and customers in each period. Risk management is addressed by incorporating a risk measure into the stochastic programming model as a second objective function, which leads to a multi-objective optimization model. The objectives aim to simultaneously maximize the expected net profit and minimize the financial risk measured. Two risk measures are compared: the conditional-value-at-risk and the downside risk. As the considered objective functions conflict with each other’s, the problem solution is a front of Pareto optimal robust alternatives, which represents the trade-off among the different objective functions. A case study using real data from textile and apparel industry in Tunisia is presented to illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed model and the robustness of the obtained solutions.
KeywordsMulti-site supply chain Textile and apparel industry Multi-objective optimization Stochastic programming Risk management
Financial support received from the Mobility of researchers and research for the creation of value (MOBIDOC) is fully appreciated. LINDO Systems, Inc is also acknowledged for giving us a free educational research license of the extended version of LINGO 15.0 software package.
- Birge, J., & Louveaux, F. (1997). Introduction to stochastic programming. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
- Chopra, S., & Meindl, P. (2010). Supply chain management: Strategy, planning, and operation (4th ed.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education, Inc.Google Scholar
- DuHadway, S., Carnovale, S. & Hazen, B., (2017). Understanding risk management for intentional supply chain disruptions: Risk detection, risk mitigation, and risk recovery. Annals of Operations Research, pp. 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-017-2452-0.
- Haimes, Y. Y., Lasdon, L. S., & Wismer, D. A. (1971). On a bicriterion formulation of the problems of integrated system identification and system optimization. IEEE Trans on Systems, Man and Cybernetics, 1, 296–297.Google Scholar
- Kong, W. M. (2008). A multi-stage stochastic linear programming model for apparel production planning. PhD thesis, City University of Hong Kong.Google Scholar
- Markowitz, H. (1952). Portfolio selection. The Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91.Google Scholar
- Safra, I. (2013). Vers une approche intégrée de planification de la production et de la distribution: Cas de l’industrie textile. PhD thesis, Central School of Paris.Google Scholar
- Sarykalin, S., Serraino, G., & Uryasev, S. (2008). Value-at-risk vs. conditional value-at-risk in risk management and optimization. In Z.-L. Chen & S. Raghavan (eds.), Tutorials in operations research (pp. 270–294). INFORMS.Google Scholar
- Uryasev, S., & Rockafellar, R. T. (2001). Conditional value-at-risk: Optimization approach. Stochastic Optimization: Algorithms and Applications, 54, 411–435.Google Scholar