Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 275, Issue 2, pp 297–319 | Cite as

On a strategic model of pollution control

  • Giorgio Ferrari
  • Torben KochEmail author
Original Research
  • 67 Downloads

Abstract

This paper proposes a strategic model of pollution control. A firm, representative of the productive sector of a country, aims at maximizing its profits by expanding its production. Assuming that the output of production is proportional to the level of pollutants’ emissions, the firm increases the level of pollution. The government of the country aims at minimizing the social costs due to the pollution, and introduces regulatory constraints on the emissions’ level, which then effectively cap the output of production. Supposing that the firm and the government face both proportional and fixed costs in order to adopt their policies, we model the previous problem as a stochastic impulse two-person nonzero-sum game. The state variable of the game is the level of the output of production which evolves as a general linearly controlled one-dimensional Itô-diffusion. Following an educated guess, we first construct a pair of candidate equilibrium policies and of corresponding equilibrium values, and we then provide a set of sufficient conditions under which they indeed realize an equilibrium. Our results are complemented by a numerical study when the (uncontrolled) output of production evolves as a geometric Brownian motion, and the firm’s operating profit and the government’s running cost functions are of power type. An analysis of the dependency of the equilibrium policies and values on the model parameters yields interesting new behaviors that we explain as a consequence of the strategic interaction between the firm and the government.

Keywords

Pollution Stochastic impulse nonzero-sum game Verification theorem Diffusions 

JEL Classification

C61 C73 Q52 

Mathematics Subject Classification

93E20 91B70 91A15 91B76 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We wish to thank Giorgia Callegaro, Herbert Dawid, Frank Riedel and Jan-Henrik Steg for useful comments. Financial support by the German Research Foundation (DFG) through the Collaborative Research Centre 1283 “Taming uncertainty and profiting from randomness and low regularity in analysis, stochastics and their applications” is gratefully acknowledged by the authors.

References

  1. Aïd, R., Basei, M., Callegaro, G., Campi, L., Vargiolu, T. (2018). Nonzero-sum stochastic differential games with impulse controls: A verification theorem with applications. Preprint arXiv:1605.00039.
  2. Alvarez, L. H. R. (2004). A class of solvable impulse control problems. Applied Mathematics and Optimization, 49, 265–295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alvarez, L. H. R., & Lempa, J. (2008). On the optimal stochastic impulse control of linear diffusions. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 47(2), 703–732.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asea, P. K., & Turnovsky, S. J. (1998). Capital income taxation and risk-taking in a small open economy. Journal of Public Economics Theory, 68(1), 55–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bensoussan, A., & Lions, J.-L. (1984). Impulse control and quasi-variational inequalities. Paris: Gauthier-Villars.Google Scholar
  6. Bensoussan, A., Moussawi-Haidar, L., & Çakanyildirim, M. (2010). Inventory control with an order-time constraint: optimality, uniqueness and significance. Annals of Operations Research, 181(1), 603–640.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bertola, G. (1998). Irreversible investment. Research in Economics, 52(1), 3–37.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borodin, A. N., & Salminen, P. (2002). Handbook of Brownian motion-facts and formulae (2nd ed.). Basel: Birkhäuser.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cadenillas, A., & Zapatero, F. (1999). Optimal central bank intervention in the foreign exchange market. Journal of Economic Theory, 87, 218–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cadenillas, A., Choulli, T., Taksar, M., & Zhang, L. (2006). Classical and impulse stochastic control for the optimization of the dividend and risk policies of an insurance firm. Mathematical Finance, 16, 181–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Dayanik, S., & Karatzas, I. (2003). On the optimal stopping problem for one-dimensional diffusions. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 107(2), 173–212.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. De Angelis, T., Ferrari, G. (2016). Stochastic nonzero-sum games: A new connection between singular control and optimal stopping. arXiv:1601.05709. Forthcoming on Adv. Appl. Probab.
  13. Eaton, J. (1981). Fiscal policy, inflation and the accumulation of risky capital. The Review of Economic Studies, 48(153), 435–445.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Egami, M. (2008). A direct solution method for stochastic impulse control problems of one-dimensional diffusions. SIAM Journal on Control and Optimization, 47(3), 1191–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Epaulard, A., & Pommeret, A. (2003). Recursive utility, endogenous growth, and the welfare cost of volatility. Review of Economic Dynamics, 6(3), 672–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Fleming, W. H., & Soner, H. M. (2005). Controlled Markov processes and viscosity solutions (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  17. Goulder, L. H., & Mathai, K. (2000). Optimal CO\(_2\) abatement in the presence of induced technological change. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 39, 1–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Harrison, J. M., Selke, T. M., & Taylor, A. J. (1983). Impulse control of Brownian motion. Mathematics of Operations Research, 8(3), 454–466.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Karatzas, I., & Shreve, S. E. (1998). Brownian motion and stochastic calculus (2nd ed.). Newyork: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Korn, R. (1999). Some applications of impulse control in mathematical finance. Mathematical Methods of Operation Research, 50, 493–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Long, N. V. (1992). Pollution control: A differential game approach. Annals of Operations Research, 37(1), 283–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. McDonald, R. L., & Siegel, D. R. (1986). The value of waiting to invest. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4), 707–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Mitchell, D., Feng, H., & Muthuraman, K. (2014). Impulse control of interest rates. Operations Research, 62(3), 602–615.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Nordhaus, W. D. (1994). Managing the global commons. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  25. Øksendal, B., & Sulem, A. (2006). Applied stochastic control of jump diffusions (2nd ed.). Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  26. Perera, S., Buckley, W., & Long, H. (2016). Market-reaction-adjusted optimal central bank intervention policy in a forex market with jumps. Annals of Operations Research,.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2297-y.Google Scholar
  27. Perman, R., Ma, Y., McGilvray, J., & Common, M. (2003). Natural resource and environmental economics (3rd ed.). Boston: Pearson, Addison Wesley.Google Scholar
  28. Peskir, G., & Shiryaev, A. (2006). Optimal stopping and free-boundary problems. Lectures in Mathematics ETH. Birkhauser.Google Scholar
  29. Pigou, A. C. (1938). The economics of welfare (4th ed.). Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  30. Pindyck, R. S. (2000). Irreversibilities and the timing of environmental policy. Resource and Energy Economics, 22, 233–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Pindyck, R. S. (2002). Optimal timing problems in environmental economics. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 26(9–10), 1677–1697.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Pommeret, A., & Prieur, F. (2013). Double irreversibility and environmental policy timing. Journal of Public Economic Theory, 15(2), 273–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Schwoon, M., & Tol, R. S. J. (2006). Optimal CO\(_2\)-abatement with socio-economic inertia and induced technological change. The Energy Journal, 27(4), 25–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. van der Ploeg, F., & de Zeeuw, A. (1991). A differential game of international pollution control. Systems & Control Letters, 17(6), 409–414.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wälde, K. (2011). Production technologies in stochastic continuous time models. Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 35(4), 616–622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Center for Mathematical EconomicsBielefeld UniversityBielefeldGermany

Personalised recommendations