Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 274, Issue 1–2, pp 75–100 | Cite as

Exact analysis for multiserver queueing systems with cross selling

  • Mor Armony
  • Efrat Perel
  • Nir PerelEmail author
  • Uri Yechiali
Original Research
  • 94 Downloads

Abstract

Exact analysis of a multi-server Markovian queueing system with cross selling in steady-state is presented. Cross selling attempt is initiated at the end of a customer’s service every time the number of customers in the system is below a threshold. Both probability generating functions (PGFs) and matrix geometric methods are employed. The relation between the methods is revealed by explicitly calculating the entries of the matrix geometric rate-matrix R. Those entries are expressed in terms of the roots of a determinant of a matrix related to the set of linear equations involving the PGFs. This is a further step towards understanding of the analytical relationship between the two methods. Numerical results are presented, showing the effect of the cross selling intensity and of the threshold level on the systems performance measures. Finally, for a given set of parameters, the optimal threshold level is determined.

Keywords

Cross-selling Probability generating functions Matrix geometric 

Mathematics Subject Classification

60K25 90B22 

References

  1. Aksin, O. Z., & Harker, P. T. (1999). To sell or not to sell determining the trade-offs between service and sales in retail banking phone centers. Journal of Service Research, 2(1), 19–33.Google Scholar
  2. Alizamir, S., de Véricourt, F., & Sun, P. (2013). Diagnostic accuracy under congestion. Management Science, 59(1), 157–171.Google Scholar
  3. Anand, K. S., Pac, M. F., & Veeraraghavan, S. (2011). Quality-speed conundrum: Trade-offs in customer-intensive services. Management Science, 57(1), 40–56.Google Scholar
  4. Armony, M., & Gurvich, I. (2010). When promotions meet operations: Cross-selling and its effect on call center performance. Manufacturing & Services Operations Management, 12(3), 470–488.Google Scholar
  5. Armony, M., & Maglaras, C. (2004a). Contact centers with a call-back option and real-time delay information. Operations Research, 52(4), 527–545.Google Scholar
  6. Armony, M., & Maglaras, C. (2004b). On customer contact centers with a call-back option: Customer decisions, routing rules, and system design. Operations Research, 52(2), 271–292.Google Scholar
  7. Artalejo, J. R., & Gómez-Corral, A. (2008). Retrial queueing systems: A computational approach. Berlin: Springer.Google Scholar
  8. Bhulai, S., & Koole, G. (2003). A queueing model for call blending in call centers. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 48(8), 1434–1438.Google Scholar
  9. Byers, R. E., & So, K. C. (2007). Note—A mathematical model for evaluating cross-sales policies in telephone service centers. Manufacturing & Services Operations Management, 9(1), 1–8.Google Scholar
  10. Gans, N., & Zhou, Y. P. (2003). A call-routing problem with service-level constraints. Operations Research, 51(2), 255–271.Google Scholar
  11. Gurvich, I., Armony, M., & Maglaras, C. (2009). Cross-selling in a call center with a heterogeneous customer population. Operations research, 57(2), 299–313.Google Scholar
  12. Gurvich, I., Armony, M., & Mandelbaum, A. (2008). Service-level differentiation in call centers with fully flexible servers. Management Science, 54(2), 279–294.Google Scholar
  13. Hanukov, G., Avinadav, T., Chernonog, T., Spiegel, U., & Yechiali, U. (2017). A queueing system with decomposed service and inventoried preliminary services. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 47, 276–293.Google Scholar
  14. Kim, C. S., Lee, M. H., Dudin, A., & Klimenok, V. (2008). Multi-server queueing systems with cooperation of the servers. Annals of Operations Research, 162(1), 57–68.Google Scholar
  15. Kostami, V., & Rajagopalan, S. (2013). Speed-quality trade-offs in a dynamic model. Manufacturing & Services Operations Management, 16(1), 104–118.Google Scholar
  16. Latouche, G., & Ramaswami, V. (1999). Introduction to matrix analytic methods in stochastic modeling. SIAMGoogle Scholar
  17. Lerzan Örmeci, E., & Zeynep Akşin, O. (2010). Revenue management through dynamic cross selling in call centers. Production and Operations Management, 19(6), 742–756.Google Scholar
  18. Litvak, N., & Yechiali, U. (2003). Routing in queues with delayed information. Queueing Systems, 43(1), 147–165.Google Scholar
  19. Mills, A., Argon, N. T., & Ziya, S. (2013). Resource-based patient prioritization in mass-casualty incidents. MSOM, 15, 361–377.Google Scholar
  20. Neuts, M. F. (1981). Matrix-geometric solutions in stochastic models: An algorithmic approach. Baltimore: The Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  21. Pang, G., & Perry, O. (2014). A logarithmic safety staffing rule for contact centers with call blending. Management Science, 61(1), 73–91.Google Scholar
  22. Paz, N., & Yechiali, U. (2014). An m/m/1 queue in random environment with disasters. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 31(03), 1450,016.Google Scholar
  23. Perel, E., & Yechiali, U. (2008). Queues where customers of one queue act as servers of the other queue. Queueing Systems, 60(3), 271–288.Google Scholar
  24. Perel, E., & Yechiali, U. (2013a). On customers acting as servers. Asia-Pacific Journal of Operational Research, 30(5)Google Scholar
  25. Perel, N., & Yechiali, U. (2013b). The Israeli queue with retrials. Queueing Systems, 78(1), 31–56.Google Scholar
  26. Perel, N., & Yechiali, U. (2014). The Israeli queue with priorities. Stochastic Models, 29(3), 353–379.Google Scholar
  27. Perel, E., & Yechiali, U. (2017). Two-queue polling systems with switching policy based on the queue that is not being served. Stochastic Models, 33(3), 430–450.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15326349,1312446.Google Scholar
  28. Perry, O., & Whitt, W. (2009). Responding to unexpected overloads in large-scale service systems. Management Science, 55(8), 1353–1367.Google Scholar
  29. Wang, X., Debo, L. G., Scheller-Wolf, A., & Smith, S. F. (2010). Design and analysis of diagnostic service centers. Management Science, 56(11), 1873–1890.Google Scholar
  30. Xu, Y., Scheller-Wolf, A., & Sycara, K. (2015). The benefit of introducing variability in single-server queues with application to quality-based service domains. Operations Research, 63(1), 233–246.Google Scholar
  31. Zhan, D., & Ward, A. R. (2015). Compensation and staffing to trade off speed and quality in large service systems. Available at SSRN.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Stern School of BusinessNew York UniversityNew YorkUSA
  2. 2.School of Industrial Engineering and ManagementAfeka College of EngineeringTel-AvivIsrael
  3. 3.School of Industrial Engineering and ManagementShenkar - Engineering, Design and ArtRamat GanIsrael
  4. 4.Department of Statistics and Operations Research, School of Mathematical SciencesTel-Aviv UniversityTel-AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations