Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 271, Issue 2, pp 599–617 | Cite as

Mitigating supply risk: an approach with quantity flexibility procurement

  • Bo HeEmail author
  • Yange Yang
Original Research
  • 158 Downloads

Abstract

This paper considers a buyer that procures from its major supplier whose production is subject to random yield risk. To mitigate supply risk, the buyer can procure from another reliable supplier who provides quantity flexibility (QF) contract. Under both deterministic and stochastic demand, we study the buyer’s optimal procurement decisions. We analyze the structural properties of optimal solutions and identify the conditions under which the quantity flexibility procurement policy should be used. We also examine the effect of supply risk, flexibility, wholesale price and demand risk on the procurement decisions. We find that the higher supply risk and demand risk reduce the buyer’s profit but have different impact on the buyer’s order policy. For the QF supplier, it may not obtain more orders by providing larger flexibility to the buyer, on the contrary, doing this may benefit the risky supplier. For the QF supplier or risky supplier, given its competitor’s wholesale price, it can increase its order share by lower wholesale price.

Keywords

Random yield Dual-sourcing Quantity flexibility Supply chain 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We appreciate for the referee’s comments on this paper, which significantly improved this paper. The authors acknowledge Xia Zhang for her assistance with the computational work in this paper. This work is supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71572021).

References

  1. Agrawal, N., & Nahmias, S. (1997). Rationalization of the supplier base in the presence of yield uncertainty. Production and Operations Management, 6(3), 291–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Cachon, G. P. (2003). Supply chain coordination with contracts. In S. Graves & T. de Kok (Eds.), Handbooks in operations research and management science: Supply chain management (p. 6). North-Holland: Elsevier.Google Scholar
  3. Chao, X., Gong, X., & Zheng, S. (2016). Optimal pricing and inventory policies with reliable and random-yield suppliers: Characterization and comparison. Annals of Operations Research, 241(1–2), 35–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Chen, W., Feng, Q., & Seshadri, S. (2013). Sourcing from suppliers with random yield for price-dependent demand. Annals of Operations Research, 208, 557–579.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Chen, K. B., & Yang, L. (2014). Random yield and coordination mechanisms of a supply chain with emergency backup sourcing. International Journal of Production Research, 52(16), 4747–4767.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Chung, W., Talluri, S., & Narasimhan, R. (2010). Flexibility or cost saving? Sourcing decisions with two suppliers. Decision Sciences, 41, 623–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Dada, M., Petruzzi, N. C., & Schwarz, L. B. (2007). A newsvendor’s procurement problem when suppliers are unreliable. Manufacturing and Service Operations Management, 9(1), 9–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Federgruen, A., & Yang, N. (2008). Selecting a portfolio of suppliers under demand and supply risks. Operations Research, 56(4), 916–936.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guo, S., Zhao, L., & Xu, X. (2016). Impact of supply risks on procurement decisions. Annals of Operations Research, 241(1–2), 411–430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Gurnani, H., & Gerchak, Y. (2007). Coordination in decentralized assembly systems with uncertain component yields. European Journal of Operational Research, 176, 1559–1576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. He, B., Huang, H., & Yuan, K. (2015). The comparison of two procurement strategies in the presence of supply disruption. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 85, 296–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. He, B., Li, G., & Liu, M. (2016). Impacts of decision sequences on a random yield supply chain with a service level requirement. Annals of Operations Research.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-016-2275-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. He, Y., & Zhang, J. (2008). Random yield risk sharing in a two-level supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 112(2), 769–781.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hu, F., Lim, C., & Lu, Z. (2013). Coordination of supply chains with a flexible ordering policy under yield and demand uncertainty. International Journal of Production Economics, 146(2), 686–693.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Keren, B. (2009). The single-period inventory problem: Extension to random yield from the perspective of the supply chain. Omega, 37(4), 801–810.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Li, X. (2017). Optimal procurement strategies from suppliers with random yield and all-or-nothing risks. Annals of Operations Research, 257(1–2), 167–181.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Okyay, H. K., Karaesmen, F., & Zekici, S. (2014). Newsvendor models with dependent random supply and demand. Optimization Letters, 8(3), 983–999.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Porteus, E. L. (2002). Foundations of stochastic inventory theory. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Sethi, S. P., Yan, H., & Zhang, H. (2004). Quantity flexibility contracts: Optimal decisions with information updates. Decision Sciences, 35(4), 691–712.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Sting, F. J., & Huchzermeier, A. (2010). Ensuring responsive capacity: How to contract with backup suppliers. European Journal of Operational Research, 207(2), 725–735.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Tang, S. Y., & Kouvelis, P. (2014). Pay-back-revenue-sharing contract in coordinating supply chains with random yield. Production and Operations Management, 23, 2089–2102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tomlin, B. (2006). On the value of mitigation and contingency strategies for managing supply chain disruption risk. Management Science, 52(5), 639–657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Tsay, A. T. (1999). The quantity flexibility contract and supplier-customer incentives. Management Science, 45(10), 1339–1358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Tsay, A. T., & Lovejoy, W. S. (1999). Quantity flexibility contracts and supply chain performance. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 1(2), 89–111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Wu, M., Zhu, S. X., & Teunter, R. H. (2013). The risk-averse newsvendor problem with random capacity. European Journal of Operational Research, 231(2), 328–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Xia, Y., Ramachandran, K., & Gurnani, H. (2011). Sharing demand and supply risk in a supply chain. IIE Transactions, 43(6), 451–469.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Xu, H. (2010). Managing production and procurement through option contracts in supply chains with random yield. International Journal of Production Economics, 126(2), 306–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Yan, X., Ji, Y., & Wang, Y. (2012). Supplier diversification under random yield. International Journal of Production Economics, 139(1), 302–311.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Yang, W., & Wu, E. (2008). Manufacturing a brand. http://www.amcham-shanghai.org/.
  30. Yano, C. A., & Lee, H. L. (1995). Lot-sizing with random yields: A review. Operations Research, 43(3), 311–334.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and Business AdministrationChongqing UniversityChongqingChina
  2. 2.China Coal Technology Engineering Group Chongqing Research InstituteChongqingChina

Personalised recommendations