Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 247, Issue 2, pp 523–547 | Cite as

Credit default swaps and systemic risk

Article

Abstract

We present a network model for investigating the impact on systemic risk of central clearing of over the counter (OTC) credit default swaps (CDS). We model contingent cash flows resulting from CDS and other OTC derivatives by a multi-layered network with a core-periphery structure, which is flexible enough to reproduce the gross and net exposures as well as the heterogeneity of market shares of participating institutions. We analyze illiquidity cascades resulting from liquidity shocks and show that the contagion of illiquidity takes place along a sub-network constituted by links identified as ’critical receivables’. A key role is played by the long intermediation chains inherent to the structure of the OTC network, which may turn into chains of critical receivables. We calibrate our model to data representing net and gross OTC exposures of large dealer banks and use this model to investigate the impact of central clearing on network stability. We find that, when interest rate swaps are cleared, central clearing of credit default swaps through a well-capitalized CCP can reduce the probability and the magnitude of a systemic illiquidity spiral by reducing the length of the chains of critical receivables within the financial network. These benefits are reduced, however, if some large intermediaries are not included as clearing members.

Keywords

Systemic risk Financial networks Multi-layered network  Credit default swaps Financial crisis Intermediation chains Financial stability 

References

  1. Allen, F., & Gale, D. (2000). Financial contagion. Journal of Political Economy, 108(1), 1–33.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Amini, H., Cont, R., & Minca, A. (2011). Resilience to contagion in financial networks. Mathematical Finance (to appear) http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/mafi.12051.
  3. Amini, H., Cont, R., & Minca, A. (2012). Stress testing the resilience of financial networks. International Journal of Theoretical and Applied Finance, 15(1), 1250006–1250026.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Amini, H., Filipovic, D., & Minca, A. (2013). Systemic risk with central counterparty clearing. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper No. 13–34. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2275376.
  5. Amini, H., & Minca, A. (2013). Mathematical modeling of systemic risk. In E. Kranakis (Ed.), Advances in network analysis and its applications (Vol. 18, pp. 3–26). Mathematics in industry Springer: Berlin.Google Scholar
  6. Amini, H., Filipovic, D., & Minca, A. (2014). To fully net or not to net: Adverse effects of partial multilateral netting. Swiss Finance Institute Research Paper No. 14-63. http://ssrn.com/abstract=2516974.
  7. Babus, A. (2007). The formation of financial networks. RAND (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  8. Babus, A. (2012). Endogenous intermediation in over-the-counter markets. Available at SSRN.Google Scholar
  9. Battiston, S., Gatti, D. D., Gallegati, M., Greenwald, B., & Stiglitz, J. E. (2009). Liaisons dangereuses: Increasing connectivity, risk sharing, and systemic risk. Preprint http://www.nber.org/papers/w15611.
  10. Blanchard, P., Chang, C.-H., & Krüger, T. (2003). Epidemic thresholds on scale-free graphs: The interplay between exponent and preferential choice. Annales Henri Poincaré, 4(suppl. 2), S957–S970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boss, M., Elsinger, H., Summer, M., & Thurner, S. (2004). The network topology of the interbank market. Quantitative Finance, 4, 677–684.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Brunnermeier, M. K. (2009). Deciphering the liquidity and credit crunch 2007–2008. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23(1), 77–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cont, R. (2010). Credit default swaps and financial stability. Financial Stability Review (Banque de France), 14, 35–43.Google Scholar
  14. Cont, R., & Kan, Y. H. (2011). Statistical modeling of credit default swap portfolios. http://ssrn.com/abstract=1771862.
  15. Cont, R., & Kokholm, T. (2014). Central clearing of otc derivatives: Bilateral vs multilateral netting. Statistics and Risk Modeling, 31(1), 3–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cont, R., Moussa, A., & Santos, E. B. (2013). Network structure and systemic risk in banking systems. In J.-P. Fouque & J. Langsam (Eds.), Handbook of systemic risk. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  17. DTCC. (2010). Trade information warehouse data. http://www.dtcc.com/products/derivserv/data/index.php.
  18. Duffie, D. (2011). How big banks fail and what to do about it. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  19. Duffie, D., Scheicher, M., & Vuillemey, G. (2014). Central clearing and collateral demand. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  20. Duffie, D., & Zhu, H. (2011). Does a central clearing counterparty reduce counterparty risk? Review of Asset Pricing Studies, 1, 74–95.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. ECB. (2009). Credit default swaps and counterparty risk. Technical report, European Central Bank.Google Scholar
  22. Farboodi, M. (2014). Intermediation and voluntary exposure to counterparty risk. Working paper, University of Chicago.Google Scholar
  23. Furfine, C. H. (1999). The microstructure of the federal funds market. Financial Markets, Institutions & Instruments, 8(5), 24–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gai, P., & Kapadia, S. (2010). Contagion in financial networks. Proceedings of the Royal Society A, 466(2120), 2401–2423.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Giglio, S. (2011). Credit default swap spreads and systemic financial risk. Proceedings of the Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago, 5, 104–141.Google Scholar
  26. Glasserman, P., & Young, H. P. (2013). How likely is contagion in financial networks? Journal of Banking and Finance (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  27. Glode, V., & Opp, C. (2013). Adverse selection and intermediation chains. Working paper.Google Scholar
  28. Heller, D., & Vause, N. (2012). Collateral requirements for mandatory central clearing of over-the-counter derivatives. BIS Working Paper 373, Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
  29. ISDA. (2010). Market review of OTC derivative bilateral collateralization practices. http://www.isda.org/c_and_a/pdf/ISDA-Margin-Survey-2010.
  30. Macroeconomic Assessment Group on Derivatives (MAGD). (2013). Macroeconomic impact assessment of OTC derivatives regulatory reforms. Technical report, Bank for International Settlements.Google Scholar
  31. Manea, M. (2013). Intermediation in networks. Working Paper.Google Scholar
  32. Minca, A. (2011). Mathematical modeling of financial contagion. PhD thesis, Universite Paris VI (Pierre et Marie Curie).Google Scholar
  33. OCC. (2010). OCC’s quarterly report on bank trading and derivatives activities. Second Quarter.Google Scholar
  34. Peltonen, T. A., Scheicher, M., & Vuillemey, G. (2014). The network structure of the CDS market and its determinants. Journal of Financial Stability, 13, 118–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Rogers, L., & Veraart, L. (2012). Failure and rescue in an interbank network. Management Science (forthcoming).Google Scholar
  36. Sidanius, C., & Zikes, F. (2012). OTC derivatives reform and collateral demand impact. Financial Stability Paper 18, Bank of England.Google Scholar
  37. Singh, M., & Aitken, J. (2009). Deleveraging after Lehman—Evidence from Reduced Rehypothecation. SSRN eLibrary.Google Scholar
  38. Stulz, R. M. (2010). Credit default swaps and the credit crisis. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 24(1), 73–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Upper, C., & Worms, A. (2002). Estimating bilateral exposures in the german interbank market: Is there a danger of contagion? Deutsche Bundesbank Discussion Paper No 09/02.Google Scholar
  40. Watts, D. J. (2002). A simple model of global cascades on random networks. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 99(9), 5766–5771.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Yellen, J. (2013). Interconnectedness and systemic risk: Lessons from the financial crisis and policy implications. Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System at the American Economic Association/American Finance Association Joint Luncheon San Diego, California.Google Scholar
  42. Zawadowski, A. (2013). Entangled financial systems. Review of Financial Studies, 26, 1291–1323.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2015

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Imperial College London & Laboratoire de Probabilités et Modeles AléatoiresCNRS-Université Pierre & Marie CurieParisFrance
  2. 2.School of Operations Research and Information EngineeringCornell UniversityIthacaUSA

Personalised recommendations