Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 226, Issue 1, pp 201–220 | Cite as

Investment decisions in mobile telecommunications networks applying real options

  • Sergio Luis FranklinJr.
Article

Abstract

This paper proposes a real options model for valuing the option to delay mobile telecommunications network investment decisions and a method for calculating the real options’ impact on mobile service costs. Ranges of option value multiples are calculated for the decisions to invest in a number of network elements, each representing a different part of the mobile network, subject to different demand and technological uncertainties. The value of the option to invest in each network element, net of future replacement options, is modeled as a function of the element’s total variable profit and the cost of investment in the element. The model and method are then applied to estimate the real options’ impact on mobile termination costs using real cost and volume data.

Keywords

Real options Investment under uncertainty Network element Demand uncertainty Mobile network Mobile termination cost 

References

  1. Alleman, J., & Noam, E. (1999). The new investment theory of real options and its implications for telecommunications economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  2. Alleman, J., & Rappoport, P. (2002). Modelling regulatory distortions with real options. The Engineering Economist, 47(4), 390–417.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelou, G. N., & Economides, A. A. (2009). A multi-criteria game theory and real-options model for irreversible ICT investment decisions. Telecommunications Policy, 33(10–11), 686–705.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baecker, P. N., Grass, G., & Hommel, U. (2009). Business value and risk in the presence of price controls: An option-based analysis of margin squeeze rules in the telecommunications industry. In Annals of Operations Research, 176, 311–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Black, F., & Scholes, M. (1973). The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. Journal of Political Economy, 81(3), 637–659.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Brennan, M., & Schwartz, E. (1985). Evaluating natural resource investments. Journal of Business, 58(2), 135–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. BTGroup (2010). Long Run Incremental Cost Model Relationship and Parameters. (2010). Retrieved from http://www.btplc.com/thegroup/regulatoryandpublicaffairs/financialstatements/2010/longrunincrementalcostmodel.pdf. Consulted 20 Mar 2014
  8. Dixit, A. X., & Pindyck, R. S. (1994). Investment under uncertainty. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Franklin, S. L, Jr, & Diallo, M. (2012). Valuing real options for network investment decisions and cost-based access pricing. The Engineering Economist, 57(4), 223–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Franklin, S. L, Jr., & Diallo, M. (2013). Model and methodology. Telecommunications policy: Real options and cost-based access pricing.Google Scholar
  11. Harmantzis, F., & Tanguturi, V. P. (2007). Investment decisions in the wireless industry applying real options. Telecommunications Policy, 31(2), 107–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hausman, J. (1999). The effect of sunk costs in telecommunications. In J. Alleman & E. Noam (Eds.), The new investment theory of real options and its implications for telecommunications economics. Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.Google Scholar
  13. Ingersoll, J. E, Jr, & Ross, S. A. (1992). Waiting to invest: Investment and uncertainty. Journal of Business, 65(1), 1–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. ITU. (2007). International Telecommunications Union’s report on world mobile telecoms market forecast. Retrieved from http://www.itu.int/pub/R-REP-M.2072. Consulted 01 Aug 2013
  15. Krouse, C. G. (2000). LRIC pricing, dynamically competitive markets and incentives to invest in telecommunications. The Antitrust Bulletin, 45(4), 921–934.Google Scholar
  16. McDonald, R., & Siegel, D. (1986). The value of waiting to invest. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 101(4), 707–728.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Merton, R. (1973). The theory of rational option pricing. Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 4(1), 141–183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Ofcom. (2010). Ofcom’s review for wholesale mobile call termination and LRIC model files. Retrieved from http://stakeholders.ofcom.org.uk/consultations/wmctr/. Consulted 01 Aug 2013
  19. Oftel. (1998). Oftel’s submission to the Monopolies and Mergers Commission inquiry into the prices of calls to mobile phones. Retrieved from: http://www.ofcom.org.uk/static/archive/oftel/publications/1995_98/pricing/mmc0598.htm#Chapt.1. Consulted 01 Aug 2013
  20. Pindyck, R. S. (2005). Pricing capital under mandatory unbundling and facilities sharing. NBER Working Paper 11225. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w11225. Consulted 05 Jan 2013
  21. Pindyck, R. S. (2007). Mandatory unbundling and irreversible investment in telecom networks. Review of Network Economics, 6(3), 274–298.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Tourinho, O. (1979). The valuation of reserves of natural resources: An option pricing approach. Ph.D Dissertation, University of California, Berkeley.Google Scholar
  23. Trigeorgis, L. (1996). Real options: Managerial flexibility and strategy in resource allocation. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  24. WikiWealth. (2013). Telecom industry WACC. Retrieved from http://www.wikiwealth.com/wacc. Consulted 01 Aug 2013.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Internet Economics GroupRJBrazil

Personalised recommendations