Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 211, Issue 1, pp 1–25 | Cite as

Dynamic pricing of remanufacturable products under demand substitution: a product life cycle model

  • Mustafa Akan
  • Barış Ata
  • R. Canan Savaşkan-Ebert
Article

Abstract

We consider a manufacturer who sells both the new and remanufactured versions of a product over its life cycle. The manufacturer’s profit depends crucially on her ability to synchronize product returns with the sales of the remanufactured product. This gives rise to a challenging dynamic optimization problem where the size of both the market and the user pool are dynamic and their current values depend on the entire history. We provide an analytical characterization of the manufacturer’s optimal pricing, production, and inventory policies which lead to a practical threshold policy with a small optimality gap. In addition, our analysis offers a number of interesting insights. First, the timing of remanufacturing activity and its co-occurrence with new product manufacturing critically depends on remanufacturing cost benefits, attractiveness of the remanufactured product and product return rate. Second, there is a small upward jump in the price of the new product when remanufacturing is introduced. Third, the manufacturer keeps the new product longer on the market as the cost of remanufacturing decreases. Fourth, partially satisfying demand for the remanufactured item is never optimal, i.e., it is satisfied either fully or not at all. Finally, user pool and inventory of returned products are substitutes in ensuring the supply for future remanufacturing.

Supplementary material

10479_2013_1409_MOESM1_ESM.pdf (346 kb)
(PDF 346 kB)

References

  1. Atasu, A., Sarvary, M., & Van Wassenhove, L. (2008). Remanufacturing as a marketing strategy. Management Science, 54(10), 1731–1747. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Caterpillar (2009). Sustainability report. http://www.cat.com/sd2009 Accessed on September 1, 2010.
  3. Debo, L. G., Toktay, L. B., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2005). Market segmentation and product technology selection for remanufacturable products. Management Science, 51(8), 1193–1205. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Debo, L. G., Toktay, L. B., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Joint life-cycle dynamics of new and remanufactured products. Production and Operations Management, 15(4), 498–513. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Dekker, R., Inderfurth, K., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004). Reverse logistics: a quantitative approach. Berlin: Springer. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Ferguson, M., & Toktay, B. (2005). The effect of competition on recovery strategies (Working Paper). Operations Management Collection, Georgia Tech Institute of Technology. Google Scholar
  7. Guide, V. D. R., Jr. (2000). Production planning and control for remanufacturing: industry practice and research needs. Journal of Operations Management, 18(4), 467–483. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Guide, V. D. R., Jr., Teunter, R. H., & van Wassenhove, L. N. (2003). Matching supply and demand to maximize profits from remanufacturing. Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, 5(4), 303–316. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Guide, V. D. R., Jr., Souza, G., Van Wassenhove, L. N., & Blackburn, J. D. (2006). Time value of commercial product returns. Management Science, 52(8), 1200–1214. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Hartl, R., Sethi, S., & Vickson, R. (1995). A survey of the maximum principles for optimal control problems with state constraints. SIAM Review, 37, 188–218. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Hauser, W., & Lund, R. (2003). The remanufacturing industry: anatomy of a giant. Boston: Boston University Press. Google Scholar
  12. Hindo, B., & Arndt, M. (2006). Everything old is new again. Business Week. September 25. Google Scholar
  13. Ho, T., Savin, S., & Terwiesch, C. (2002). Managing demand and sales dynamics in new product diffusion under supply constraint. Management Science, 48(2), 187–206. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Krikke, H. R. (1998). Recovery strategies and reverse logistics network design. PhD thesis, University of Twente. Google Scholar
  15. Kumar, S., & Swaminathan, J. (2003). Diffusion of innovations under supply constraints. Operational Research, 51(6), 866–879. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Mahajan, V., Muller, E., & Wind, Y. (2000). New product diffusion models. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  17. Majumder, P., & Groenevelt, H. (2001). Competition in remanufacturing. Production and Operations Management, 10(2), 125–141. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Oksendal, B. (2005). Stochastic differential equations: an introduction with applications (6th ed.). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  19. Savaskan, R. C., Bhattacharya, S., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2004). Closed-loop supply chain models with product remanufacturing. Management Science, 50(2), 239–252. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Savaskan, R. C., & Van Wassenhove, L. N. (2006). Reverse channel design: the case of competing retailers. Management Science, 52(1), 1–14. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Seierstad, A., & Sydsaeter, K. (1987). Optimal control theory with economic applications. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
  22. Sethi, S. P., & Thompson, G. (2000). Optimal control theory: applications to management science and economics. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  23. Van der Laan, E., Salomon, M., Dekker, R., & Van Wassenhove, L. (1999). Inventory control in hybrid production systems with remanufacturing. Management Science, 45(5), 151–172. Google Scholar
  24. Xerox (2007). Report on global citizenship. www.xerox.com. Accessed on September 1, 2010.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2013

Authors and Affiliations

  • Mustafa Akan
    • 1
  • Barış Ata
    • 2
  • R. Canan Savaşkan-Ebert
    • 3
  1. 1.Tepper School of BusinessCarnegie-Mellon UniversityPittsburghUSA
  2. 2.Booth School of BusinessUniversity of ChicagoChicagoUSA
  3. 3.Cox School of BusinessSouthern Methodist UniversityDallasUSA

Personalised recommendations