Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 202, Issue 1, pp 35–58 | Cite as

On minimal representations of Rational Arrival Processes

  • Peter Buchholz
  • Miklós TelekEmail author
Article

Abstract

Rational Arrival Processes (RAPs) form a general class of stochastic processes which include Markovian Arrival Processes (MAPs) as a subclass. In this paper we study RAPs and their representations of different sizes. We show some transformation methods between different representations and present conditions to evaluate the size of the minimal representation. By using some analogous results from linear systems theory, a minimization approach is defined which allows one to transform a RAP (from a redundant high dimension) into one of its minimal representations. An algorithm for computing a minimal representation is also given. Furthermore, we extend the approach to RAPs with batch arrivals (BRAPs) and to RAPs with arrivals of different customer types (MRAPs).

Keywords

Rational arrival process Markov arrival process Minimal representation 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Akar, N. (2006). Solving the ME/ME/1 queue with state-space methods and the matrix sign function. Performance Evaluation, 63, 131–145. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Asmussen, S., & Bladt, M. (1997). Renewal theory and queueing algorithms for matrix-exponential distributions. In Lecture notes in pure and appl. math.: Vol. 183. Matrix-analytic methods in stochastic models (pp. 313–341). Google Scholar
  3. Asmussen, S., & Bladt, M. (1999). Point processes with finite-dimensional conditional probabilities. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 82, 127–142. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bean, N. G., & Nielsen, B. F. (2010). Quasi-birth-and-death processes with rational arrival process components. Stochastic Models, 26(3), 309–334. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bodrog, L., Horvath, A., & Telek, M. (2008). Moment characterization of matrix exponential and Markovian arrival processes. Annals of Operations Research, 160, 51–58. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Buchholz, P., & Telek, M. (2010). Stochastic Petri nets with matrix exponentially distributed firing times. Performance Evaluation, 67(12), 1373–1385. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Commault, C., & Mocanu, S. (2003). Phase-type distributions and representations: some open problems for system theory. International Journal of Control, 76(6), 566–580. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Davis, J. M., Gravagne, I. A., Jackson, B. J., & Marks, R. J. II (2009). Controllability, observability, realizability and stability of dynamic linear systems. Electronic Journal of Differential Equations, 37, 1–32. Google Scholar
  9. de Schutter, B. (2000). Minimal state-space realization in linear system theory: An overview. Journal of Computational and Applied Mathematics, 121(1–2), 331–354. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Golub, G. H., & Van Loan, C. F. (1996). Matrix computations (3rd ed.). Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press Google Scholar
  11. He, Q. M., & Neuts, M. (1998). Markov arrival processes with marked transitions. Stochastic Processes and Their Applications, 74, 37–52. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. He, Q. M., & Zhang, H. (2007). On matrix exponential distributions. Advances in Applied Probability, 39, 271–292. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Heindl, A., Zhang, Q., & Smirni, E. (2004). ETAQA truncation models for the MAP/MAP/1 departure process. In QEST (pp. 100–109). Google Scholar
  14. Lipsky, L. (2008). Queueing theory: a linear algebraic approach. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  15. Lucantoni, D. M. (1991). New results on the single server queue with a batch Markovian arrival process. Stochastic Models, 7, 1–46. Google Scholar
  16. Mitchell, K. (2001). Constructing a correlated sequence of matrix exponentials with invariant first order properties. Operations Research Letters, 28, 27–34. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Neuts, M. F. (1979). A versatile Markovian point process. Journal of Applied Probability, 16, 764–779. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. O’Cinneide, C. A. (1999). Phase-type distributions: Open problems and a few properties. Stochastic Models, 15(4), 731–757. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Telek, M., & Horváth, G. (2007). A minimal representation of Markov arrival processes and a moments matching method. Performance Evaluation, 64(9–12), 1153–1168. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Van Dooren, P. M. (1981). The generalized eigenstructure on linear system theory. IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 26(1), 111–129. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Varga, A. (1991). Minimal realization procedures based on balancing and related techniques. In F. Pichler & R. Moreno-Díaz (Eds.), Lecture notes in computer science: Vol. 585. EUROCAST (pp. 733–761). Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  22. Zhang, Q., Heindl, A., & Smirni, E. (2005). Characterizing the BMAP/MAP/1 departure process via the ETAQA truncation. Stochastic Models, 21(2–3), 821–846. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Informatik IVTU DortmundDortmundGermany
  2. 2.Department of TelecommunicationsTechnical University of BudapestBudapestHungary

Personalised recommendations