Advertisement

Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 199, Issue 1, pp 113–135 | Cite as

Integration of timetable planning and rolling stock in rapid transit networks

  • Luis Cadarso
  • Ángel MarínEmail author
Article

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to propose an integrated planning model to adequate the offered capacity and system frequencies to attend the increased passenger demand and traffic congestion around urban and suburban areas. The railway capacity is studied in line planning, however, these planned frequencies were obtained without accounting for rolling stock flows through the rapid transit network.

In order to provide the problem more freedom to decide rolling stock flows and therefore better adjusting these flows to passenger demand, a new integrated model is proposed, where frequencies are readjusted. Then, the railway timetable and rolling stock assignment are also calculated, where shunting operations are taken into account. These operations may sometimes malfunction, causing localized incidents that could propagate throughout the entire network due to cascading effects. This type of operations will be penalized with the goal of selectively avoiding them and ameliorating their high malfunction probabilities. Swapping operations will also be ensured using homogeneous rolling stock material and ensuring parkings in strategic stations.

We illustrate our model using computational experiments drawn from RENFE (the main Spanish operator of suburban passenger trains) in Madrid, Spain. The results show that through this integrated approach a greater robustness degree can be obtained.

Keywords

Timetable Rolling sock Integration Rapid transit Robustness 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Alfieri, A., Groot, R., Kroon, L. G., & Schrijver, A. (2006). Efficient circulation of railway rolling stock. Transportation Science, 40, 378–391. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Brännlund, U., Lindberg, P. O., Nou, A., & Nilsson, J. E. (1998). Railway timetabling using Lagrangian relaxation. Transportation Science, 32, 358–369. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Ben-Khedher, N., Kintanar, J., Queille, C., & Stripling, W. (1998). Schedule optimization at SNCF: from conception to day of departure. Interfaces, 28, 6–23. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Cacchiani, V., Caprara, A., & Toth, P. (2010). Scheduling extra freight trains on railway networks. Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological, 44(2), 215–231. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cadarso, L., & Marín, A. (2011). Robust rolling stock in rapid transit networks. Computers & Operations Research, 38(8), 1131–1142. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Caprara, A., Fischetti, M., & Toth, P. (2002). Modeling and solving the train timetabling problem. Operations Research, 50, 851–861. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Caprara, A., Monaci, M., Toth, P., & Guida, P. L. (2006). A Lagrangian heuristic approach to real-world train timetabling problems. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 154, 738–753. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Caprara, A., Kroon, L., Monaci, M., Peeters, M., & Toth, P. (2007). Passenger railway optimization. In C. Barnhart & G. Laporte (Eds.), Handbook in operations research and management science (vol. 14). Elsevier: Amsterdam. Google Scholar
  9. Carraresi, P., Malucelli, F., & Pallottino, S. (1996). Regional mass transit assignment with resource constraints. Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological, 30(2), 81–98. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Cordeau, J. F., Soumis, F., & Desrosiers, J. (2000). A Benders decomposition approach for the locomotive and car assignment problem. Transportation Science, 34, 133–149. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cordeau, J. F., Desaulniers, G., Lingaya, N., Soumis, F., & Desrosiers, J. (2001). Simultaneous locomotive and car assignment at VIA Rail Canada. Transportation Research. Part B: Methodological, 35, 767–787. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Fioole, P. J., Kroon, L. G., Maróti, G., & Schrijver, A. (2006). A rolling stock circulation model for combining and splitting of passenger trains. European Journal of Operational Research, 174(2), 1281–1297. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Kroon, L. G., & Peeters, L. W. P. (2003). A variable trip time model for cyclic railway timetabling. Transportation Science, 37, 198–212. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Liebchen, C., & Möhring, R. H. (2008). The modeling power of the periodic event scheduling problem: railway timetables—and beyond. In Lecture notes in economics and mathematical systems: Vol. 600 (II). Computer-aided Systems in Public Transport (pp. 117–150). CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Maróti, G. (2006). Operations research models for railway rolling stock planning. PhD thesis, Eindhoven, Technische Universiteit Eindhoven. Google Scholar
  16. Mellouli, T., & Suhl, L. (2007). Rotation planning of locomotive and carriage groups with shared capacities. In F. Geraets, L. G. Kroon, A. Schöbel, D. Wagner, & C. Zaroliagis (Eds.), Algorithmic methods for railway optimization. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  17. Nachtingall, K. (1996). Periodic network optimization with different arc frequencies. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 69, 1–17. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Nachtingall, K., & Voget, S. (1997). Minimizing waiting times in integrated fixed interval timetables by upgrading railway tracks. European Journal of Operational Research, 103, 610–627. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Serafini, P., & Ukovich, W. (1989). A mathematical model for periodic event scheduling problems. SIAM Journal on Discrete Mathematics, 2, 550–581. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Politécnica de Madrid, E.T.S.I. AeronáuticosMadridSpain

Personalised recommendations