Annals of Operations Research

, Volume 191, Issue 1, pp 23–36 | Cite as

Improved complexity results for several multifacility location problems on trees

Article

Abstract

In this paper we consider multifacility location problems on tree networks. On general networks, these problems are usually NP-hard. On tree networks, however, often polynomial time algorithms exist; e.g., for the median, center, centdian, or special cases of the ordered median problem. We present an enhanced dynamic programming approach for the ordered median problem that has a time complexity of just O(ps 2 n 6) for the absolute and O(ps 2 n 2) for the node restricted problem, improving on the previous results by a factor of O(n 3). (n and p being the number of nodes and new facilities, respectively, and s (≤n) a value specific for the ordered median problem.) The same reduction in complexity is achieved for the multifacility k-centrum problem leading to O(pk 2 n 4) (absolute) and O(pk 2 n 2) (node restricted) algorithms.

Keywords

Multifacility location problems Dynamic programming Tree networks Ordered median problem 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. Cole, R. (1987). Slowing down sorting networks to obtain faster algorithms. Journal of the ACM, 34, 168–177. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Frederickson, G. (1990). Optimal algorithms for partitioning trees and locating p-centers in trees (Technical report). Department of Computer Science, Purdue University. Google Scholar
  3. Hassin, R., & Tamir, A. (1991). Improved complexity bounds for location problems on the real line. Operations Research Letters, 10, 395–402. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Kalcsics, J. (2006). Unified approaches to territory design and facility location. Aachen: Shaker. PhD Thesis. Google Scholar
  5. Kalcsics, J., Nickel, S., Puerto, J., & Tamir, A. (2002). Algorithmic results for ordered median problems. Operations Research Letters, 30, 149–158. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Kalcsics, J., Nickel, S., & Puerto, J. (2003). Multi-facility ordered median problems: a further analysis. Networks, 41(1), 1–12. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kariv, O., & Hakimi, S. (1979a). An algorithmic approach to network location problems I: the p-centers. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 42, 513–538. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Kariv, O., & Hakimi, S. (1979b). An algorithmic approach to network location problems II: the p-medians. SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, 42, 539–560. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Megiddo, N., & Tamir, A. (1983). New results on the complexity of p-center problems. SIAM Journal on Computing, 12, 751–758. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Nickel, S., & Puerto, J. (1999). A unified approach to network location problems. Networks, 34, 283–290. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Nickel, S., & Puerto, J. (2005). Location theory—a unified approach. Berlin: Springer. Google Scholar
  12. Pérez-Brito, D., Moreno-Pérez, J., & Rodríguez-Martín, I. (1997). Finite dominating set for the p-facility cent-dian network location problem. Studies in Locational Analysis, 11, 27–40. Google Scholar
  13. Puerto, J., & Rodríguez-Chía, A. (2005). On the exponential cardinality of finite dominating sets for the multifacility ordered median problem. Operations Research Letters, 33(6), 641–651. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Tamir, A. (1996). An O(pn 2) algorithm for the p-median and related problems on tree graphs. Operations Research Letters, 19, 59–64. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Tamir, A. (2000). The k-centrum multi-facility location problem. Discrete Applied Mathematics, 109, 292–307. Google Scholar
  16. Tamir, A., Pérez-Brito, D., & Moreno-Pérez, J. A. (1998). A polynomial algorithm for the p-centdian problem on a tree. Networks, 32, 255–262. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Operations ResearchKarlsruhe Institute of TechnologyKarlsruheGermany

Personalised recommendations