Modeling the synergy level in a vertical collaborative supply chain through the IMP interaction model and DEA framework
- 269 Downloads
This work develops a mathematical programming model that characterizes the main variables present in the interaction dynamics of each agent in a collaborative vertical logistical system, such as a supply chain, and measures the synergy level of such system. The model is based on the interaction model developed by the IMP (Industrial Marketing and Purchasing) group and also on the DEA (Data Envelopment Analysis) framework. The basics of these two approaches allow modeling of the characteristics of an agent as well as the collaborative relationships with other agents within the chain. The model was validated using information of supply chain of leather and its products, classified by DANE (Departamento Nacional de Estadistica—Colombia) as the sector CIIU323.
KeywordsVertical collaborative supply chain Interaction model IMP Synergy DEA (Data envelopment analysis)
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Barratt, M. A., & Oliveira, A. (2001). Exploring the experiences of collaborative planning: the enablers and inhibitors. International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, 31(2), 266–89. Google Scholar
- Browning, B., & White, A. (2000). Collaborative transportation management. Logility, Inc. White Paper. http://www.cpfr.org.
- Chandra, C., & Kumar, S. (2001). Enterprise architectural framework for supply-chain integration. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 101(5/6), 290–304. Google Scholar
- Charnes, A., Cooper, W., Lewin, A., & Seiford, L. (1994). Data envelopment analysis: theory, methodology, and applications. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar
- Chen, Y., & Zhu, J. (2002). Data envelopment analysis interpretation and uses by multiple objective linear programming (Working paper). Google Scholar
- Cooke, J. (1998). Into the great wide open. Logistics Management and Distribution Report, 37(10), 84–87. Google Scholar
- Färe, R., Grosskopf, S., & Lovell, C. (1994). Production frontiers. New York: Cambridge University Press. Google Scholar
- Forrester, J. W. (1961). Industrial dynamics. Cambridge: The MIT Press. Google Scholar
- Giannakis, M., Croom, S., & Slack, N. (2004). Understanding supply chains: concepts, critiques, and futures. London: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
- Ghiani, G., Laporte, G., & Musmanno, R. (2004). Wiley-Interscience series in systems and optimization. Introduction to logistics systems planning and control. New York: Wiley-Interscience. Google Scholar
- Gunnar, S., & Russel, D. (2008). Supply chain interfaces: defining attributes and attribute values for collaborative logistics management. Journal of Business Logistics, 29(1), 347–359. Google Scholar
- Holmstrom, J., Framling, K., Kaipia, R., & Saranen, J. (2002). Collaborative planning forecasting and replenishment: new solutions needed for mass collaboration. Supply Chain Management, 7(3/4), 136–145. Google Scholar
- Hopp, W. J., & Spearman, M. L. (2001). Factory physics: foundations of manufacturing management. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
- IMP Group (1999). Understanding business marketing and purchasing: an interaction approach (pp. 235–247). Thomson learning. Google Scholar
- Jatusripitak, S., Fahey, L., & Kotler, P. (1985). Strategic global marketing: lessons from the Japanese. Columbia Journal of World Business, 20(1), 47. Google Scholar
- Kalenatic, D., López, C., & González, L. (2006). Modelo integral de producción en empresas manufactureras. Bogotá: Universidad Católica de Colombia. Google Scholar
- Karolefsky, J. (2001). Collaborating across the supply chain. Collaboration in practice. In Food logistics and reailtech magazines (pp. 24–34). Fall 2001. Google Scholar
- Leontief, W. (1986). Input-output economics. New York: Oxford University Press. Google Scholar
- Pramatari, K., Evgeniou, T., & Doukidis, G. (2009). Implementation of collaborative e-supply chain initiatives: an initial challenging and final success case from grocery retailing. Journal of Information Technology, 23(4). Google Scholar
- Salmon, K. (1993). Efficient costumer response: enhancing consumer value in the grocery industry. Washington: FMI. Google Scholar
- Seifert, D. (2003). Collaborative planning, forecasting, and replenishment: how to create a supply chain advantage. New York: Amacom. Google Scholar
- Simchi-Levi, D., & Simchi-Levi, E. (2001). Logistics systems modeling. In Handbook of industrial engineering (pp. 2007–2019). New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
- Terry, L., & Williams, L. (2003). The value of collaborative transportation management (CTM): its relationship to CPFR and information technology. Transportation Journal, 42(4), 55–65. Google Scholar
- VICS (Voluntary Inter-Industry Commerce Standards Association) (1998). Collaborative planning, forecasting and replenishment (CPFR). http://www.cpfr.org.
- Zhu, J. (2002). Quantitative models for performance evaluation and benchmarking: data envelopment analysis with spreadsheets and DEA excel solver. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar