Skip to main content

Nuclear threat detection with mobile distributed sensor networks

Abstract

The ability to track illicit radioactive source in an urban environment is critical in national security applications. To this end, two modes of operation are common: positioning individual portal monitors, and deploying a network of distributed sensors. We address here the use of multiple detectors, mounted on moving vehicles, for the purpose of detecting nuclear threats. An example scenario is that of multiple taxi cabs each carrying a detector. The detectors’ positions are known in real-time as these are continuously reported from GPS data. The level of detected risk is then reported from each detector at each position. The problem is to delineate the presence of a potentially dangerous source and its approximate location by identifying a small area that has an elevated concentration of reported risk. This problem of using spatially deployed mobile detector networks to identify and locate risks is modeled and formulated here. The problem is shown to be solvable in polynomial time and with a combinatorial network flow algorithm. The efficiency of the algorithm enable its use in real time, and in areas containing a large number of deployed detectors. A simulation study, that takes into account false-positive and false-negatives reports from individual sensors, demonstrates the effectiveness of the algorithm in using the sensor network’s detection capabilities.

References

  1. Attix, F. H. (1986). Introduction to radiological physics and radiation dosimetry. New York: Wiley.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  2. Berger, M. J., Hubbell, J. H., Seltzer, S. M., Chang, J., Coursey, J. S., Sukumar, R., & Zucker, D. S. (1998). Xcom: Photon cross sections database. Standard reference database 8 (xgam). National Institute of Standards and Technology.

  3. Brennan, S. M., Mielke, A. M., Torney, D. C., & MacCabe, A. B. (2004). Radiation detection with distributed sensor networks. Computer, 37(8), 57–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Brennan, S. M., Mielke, A. M., & Torney, D. C. (2005). Radioactive source detection by sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 52(3), 813–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chandran, B., & Hochbaum, D. S. (2009). Pseudoflow solver. http://riot.ieor.berkeley.edu/riot/Applications/Pseudoflow/maxflow.html.

  6. Cunningham, C. T. (1995). Detecting and track of a stochastic target using multiple measurements (Technical Report UCRL-ID 122786). Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory.

  7. Fawcett, T. (2006). An introduction to roc analysis. Pattern Recognition Letters, 27(8), 861–874.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ford, L. R., & Fulkerson, D. R. (1956). Maximal flow through a network. Canadian Journal of Mathematics, 8(3), 339–404.

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hochbaum, D. S. (2008). The pseudoflow algorithm: A new algorithm for the maximum-flow problem. Operations Research, 56(4), 992–1009.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hochbaum, D. S. (2009). The multi-sensor nuclear threat detection problem. In J. W. Chinneck, B. Kristjansson, & M. J. Saltzman (Eds.), Operations research/computer science interfaces series : Vol. 47. Operations research and cyber-infrastructure (pp. 389–399). New York: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  11. Nemzek, R. J., Dreicer, J. S., Torney, D. C., & Warnock, T. T. (2004). Distributed sensor networks for detection of mobile radioactive sources. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 51(4), 1693–1700.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Papoulis, A. (1975). A new algorithm in spectral analysis and band-limited extrapolation. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 22(9), 735–742.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Schaller, B. (2006). The New York city taxicab fact book (Technical report). Schaller Consulting, 94 Windsor Place, Brooklyn, NYC, NY, US.

  14. Stephens, D. L., & Peurrung, A. J. (2004). Detection of moving radioactive sources using sensor networks. IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science, 51(5), 2273–2278.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. UN Scientific Committee on Effects of Atomic Radiation (2000). Report to the general assembly, with scientific annexes, volume I: Sources (Technical report). United Nations General Assembly.

  16. Unger, L. M., & Trubey, D. K. (1982). Specific gamma-ray dose constants for nuclides important to dosimetry and radiological assessment (Technical Report ORNL/RSIC-45/R1). Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

  17. University of California at Berkeley (2009). Domestic nuclear threat security initiative. http://donuts.berkeley.edu.

  18. Yaroslavsky, L. P., Shabat, G., Salomon, B. G., Ideses, I. A., & Fishbain, B. (2009). Nonuniform sampling, image recovery from sparse data and the discrete sampling theorem. Journal of Optical Society of America A, 26(3), 566–575.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Barak Fishbain.

Additional information

CBET-0736232 and NSF award No. DMI-0620677.

Rights and permissions

Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hochbaum, D.S., Fishbain, B. Nuclear threat detection with mobile distributed sensor networks. Ann Oper Res 187, 45–63 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0643-z

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-009-0643-z

  • Nuclear threat detection
  • Network flow
  • Parametric cut
  • Counter-terrorism
  • Discrete event simulation