Use of stochastic and mathematical programming in portfolio theory and practice

Article

Abstract

Standard finance portfolio theory draws graphs and writes equations usually with no constraints and frequently in the univariate case. However, in reality, there are multivariate random variables and multivariate asset weights to determine with constraints. Also there are the effects of transaction costs on asset prices in the theory and calculation of optimal portfolios in the static and dynamic cases. There we use various stochastic programming, linear complementary, quadratic programming and nonlinear programming problems. This paper begins with the simplest problems and builds the theory to the more complex cases and then applies it to real financial asset allocation problems, hedge funds and professional racetrack betting.

Keywords

Portfolio theory Mean-variance analysis Risk aversion Utility function Stochastic programming Capital growth theory 

References

  1. Algoet, P. H., & Cover, T. (1988). Asymptotic optimality and asymptotic equipartition properties of log-optimum investment. Annals of Probability, 16(2), 876–898. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Arrow, K. J. (1965). Aspects of the theory of risk bearing (Technical report). Yrjö Jahnsson Foundation, Helsinki. Google Scholar
  3. Breiman, L. (1961). Optimal gambling system for favorable games. Proceedings of the 4th Berkeley Symposium on Mathematical Statistics and Probability, 1, 63–68. Google Scholar
  4. Chopra, V. K. (1993). Improving optimization, Journal of Investing, 51–59. Google Scholar
  5. Chopra, V. K., & Ziemba, W. T. (1993). The effect of errors in mean, variance and co-variance estimates on optimal portfolio choice. Journal of Portfolio Management, 19, 6–11. Google Scholar
  6. Geyer, A., & Ziemba, W. T. (2008). The innovest Austrian pension fund planning model InnoALM. Operations Research, 56(4), 797–810. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Hakansson, N. H., & Ziemba, W. T. (1995). Capital growth theory. In R. A. Jarrow, V.Maksimovic & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Finance handbook (pp. 123–144). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
  8. Hanoch, G., & Levy, H. (1969). The efficiency analysis of choices involving risk. Review of Economic Studies, 36, 335–346. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Hausch, D. B., & Ziemba, W. T. (Eds.) (2008). Handbooks in finance. Handbook of sports and lottery markets. Amsterdam: North Holland. Google Scholar
  10. Hausch, D. B., Lo, V. S. Y., & Ziemba, W. T. (Eds.) (1994). The efficiency of racetrack betting markets. New York: Academic Press. Google Scholar
  11. Hausch, D. B., Lo, V. S. Y., & Ziemba, W. T. (Eds.) (2008). The efficiency of racetrack betting markets. Singapore: World Scientific. Google Scholar
  12. Kallberg, J. G., & Ziemba, W. T. (1981). Remarks on optimal portfolio selection. In G. Bamberg & O. Opitz (Eds.), Methods of operations research (Vol. 44, pp. 507–520). Oelgeschlager: Gunn and Hain. Google Scholar
  13. Kallberg, J. G., & Ziemba, W. T. (1983). Comparison of alternative utility functions in portfolio selection problems. Management Science, 29(11), 1257–1276. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kallberg, J. G., & Ziemba, W. T. (1984). Mis-specifications in portfolio selection problems. In G. Bamberg & K. Spremann (Eds.), Risk and capital (pp. 74–87). New York: Springer. Google Scholar
  15. Kelly, Jr., J. L. (1956). A new interpretation of information rate. Bell System Technical Journal, 35, 917–926. Google Scholar
  16. Lintner, J. (1965). The valuation of risk assets and the selection of risky investment in stock portfolios and capital budgets. Review of Economics and Statistics, 47, 13–37. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. MacLean, L. C., & Ziemba, W. T. (2006). Capital growth theory and practice. In S. A. Zenios & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Handbooks in finance: Vol. 1. Handbook of asset and liability management (pp. 139–197). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
  18. Mangasarian, O. L. (1969). Nonlinear programming. New York: McGraw-Hill. Google Scholar
  19. Markowitz, H. M. (1952). Portfolio selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1), 77–91. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Markowitz, H. M. (1987). Mean-variance analysis in portfolio choice and capital markets. Cambridge: Basil Blackwell. Google Scholar
  21. Markowitz, H. M., & van Dijk, E. (2006). Risk-return analysis. In S. A. Zenios & W. T. Ziemba (Eds.), Handbooks in finance: Vol. 1. Handbook of asset and liability management (pp. 139–197). Amsterdam: North-Holland. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Mossin, J. (1966). Equilibrium in a capital asset market. Econometrica, 34, 768–783. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Murty, K. G. (1972). On the number of solutions to the complementarity problem and spanning properties of complementarity cones. Linear Algebra, 5, 65–108. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Pratt, J. W. (1964). Risk aversion in the small and in the large. Econometrica, 32, 122–136. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Sharpe, W. F. (1964). Capital asset prices: A theory of market equilibrium under conditions of risk. Journal of Finance, 19, 425–442. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Tobin, J. (1958). Liquidity preference as behavior towards risk. Review of Economic Studies, 25(2), 65–86. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Zangwill, W. I. (1969). Nonlinear programming: a unified approach. New York: Prentice Hall. Google Scholar
  28. Ziemba, R. E. S., & Ziemba, W. T. (2007). Scenarios for risk management and global investment strategies. New York: Wiley. Google Scholar
  29. Ziemba, W. T. (1974). Calculating investment portfolios when the returns have stable distributions. In P. L. Hammer & G. Zoutendijk (Eds.), Mathematical programming in theory and practice (pp. 443–482). Amsterdam: North-Holland. Google Scholar
  30. Ziemba, W. T. (2003). The stochastic programming approach to asset liability and wealth management. Charlottesville: AIMR. Google Scholar
  31. Ziemba, W. T. (2005). The symmetric downside risk sharpe ratio and the evaluation of great investors and speculators. Journal of Portfolio Management Fall, 108–122. Google Scholar
  32. Ziemba, W. T., & Hausch, D. B. (1986). Betting at the racetrack. Los Angeles: Dr. Z Investments. Google Scholar
  33. Ziemba, W. T., & Vickson, R. G. (Eds.) (1975). Stochastic optimization models in finance. New York: Academic Press. Reprinted (2006) with a new preface, Singapore: World Scientific. Google Scholar
  34. Ziemba, W. T., Parkan, C., & Brooks-Hill, F. J. (1974). Calculation of investment portfolios with risk free borrowing and lending. Management Science, XXI, 209–222. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2008

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Financial Modeling and Stochastic Optimization (Emeritus), Sauder School of BusinessUBCVancouverCanada
  2. 2.Mathematical InstituteOxford UniversityOxfordUK
  3. 3.ICMA CentreUniversity of ReadingReadingUK

Personalised recommendations