Designing sniping agents
- First Online:
- 79 Downloads
Sniping agents are increasingly being deployed to assist bidders in acquiring items in online auctions. This paper reviews the extant auction literature and proposes an overarching sniping agent design framework that could potentially increase the commercial viability of snipping agents. For better alignment between the functions of sniping agents and the needs of human bidders, we review existing literature based on three fundamentals: (1) knowledge about human bidder behavior, (2) awareness of the product(s) desired by a bidder, and (3) an understanding of the research on bidding agents and auction design. The output of this review is the explicit consideration of iterative combinatorial auction agent design, fuzzy set representation of the bidder’s preferences and dynamic derivation of bidding strategies according to the progress of ongoing auctions.
KeywordsOnline auctions Sniping agent Heuristics
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Ariely, D., & Simonson, I. (2003). Buying, bidding, playing, or competing? Value assessment and decision dynamics in online auctions. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(1–2), 113–123. Google Scholar
- Bapna, R., Jank, W., & Shmueli, G. (2004). Price formation and its dynamics in online auctions (Working paper). Department of Operations and Information Management, University of Maryland. Available online: http://www.rhsmith.umd.edu/ceme/statistics/auctionDynamics.pdf.
- Greenwald, A. (2003). The 2002 trading agent competition: An overview of agent strategies. AI Magazine, 24(1), 83–91. Google Scholar
- He, M. H., Jennings, N. R., & Prgel-Bennett, A. (2004). An adaptive bidding agent for multiple English auctions: A neuro-fuzzy approach. In: Proceedings of IEEE conference on fuzzy systems, Budapest, Hungary (pp. 1519–1524). Google Scholar
- Ito, T., Fukuta, N., Shintani, T., & Sycara, K. (2000). Biddingbot: A multiagent support system for cooperative bidding in multiple auctions. In Proceedings of the 4th international conference on multi-agent systems, Boston, MA (pp. 399–400). Los Alamitos: IEEE Comput. Soc. Google Scholar
- Liu, Y. X., Goodwin, R., & Koenig, S. (2003). Risk-averse auction agents. In Proceedings of the 2nd international joint conference on autonomous agents and multiagent systems (AAMAS), Melbourne, Australia (pp. 353–360). Google Scholar
- Lucking-Reiley, D. (2000). Auctions on the internet: What’s being auctioned and how? Journal of Industrial Economics, 48(3), 227–252. Google Scholar
- Matsubara, S. (2000). Accelerating information revelation in ascending-bid auctions: Avoiding last minute bidding. In Proceedings of the 3rd ACM conference on electronic commerce, Tampa, Florida, USA (pp. 29–37). Google Scholar
- Matsumoto, Y., & Fujita, S. (2001). An auction agent for bidding on combinations of items. In Proceedings of the fifth international conference on autonomous agents, Montreal, Quebec, Canada (pp. 552–559). Google Scholar
- Nwana, H. S., Rosenschein, J., Sandholm, T., Sierra, C., Maes, P., & Guttmann, R. (1998). Agent-mediated electronic commerce: Issues, challenges and some viewpoints. In Proceedings of the 2nd international conference on autonomous agents, Minneapolis (pp. 189–196). Google Scholar
- Ockenfels, A., & Roth, A. E. (2002). The timing of bids in internet auctions: Market design, bidder behavior, and artificial agents. AI Magazine, 23(3), 79–88. Google Scholar
- Ogston, E., & Vassiliadis, S. (2002). A peer-to-peer agent auction. In First international joint conference on autonomous agents and multi-agent systems (AAMAS), Bologna, Italy (pp. 151–159). Google Scholar
- Parkes, D. C. (1999). iBundle: An efficient ascending price bundle auction. In Proceedings of the 1st ACM conference on electronic commerce, Denver, Colorado, USA (pp. 148–157). Google Scholar
- Sandholm, T. (1999). Approaches to winner determination in combinatorial auctions. Decision Support Systems, 28(1–2), 165–176. Google Scholar
- Vakrat, Y., & Seidmann, A. (2000). Implications of the bidders’ arrival process on the design of online auctions. In Proceedings of the 33rd Hawaii international conference on systems science, USA (p. 6015). Google Scholar