Self-tuning of fuzzy belief rule bases for engineering system safety analysis
- First Online:
- 133 Downloads
A framework for modelling the safety of an engineering system using a fuzzy rule-based evidential reasoning (FURBER) approach has been recently proposed, where a fuzzy rule-base designed on the basis of a belief structure (called a belief rule base) forms a basis in the inference mechanism of FURBER. However, it is difficult to accurately determine the parameters of a fuzzy belief rule base (FBRB) entirely subjectively, in particular for complex systems. As such, there is a need to develop a supporting mechanism that can be used to train in a locally optimal way a FBRB initially built using expert knowledge. In this paper, the methods for self-tuning a FBRB for engineering system safety analysis are investigated on the basis of a previous study. The method consists of a number of single and multiple objective nonlinear optimization models. The above framework is applied to model the system safety of a marine engineering system and the case study is used to demonstrate how the methods can be implemented.
KeywordsSafety analysis Uncertainty Fuzzy logic Belief rule-base Evidential reasoning Optimization
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Chen, H., & Moan, T. (2002). Collision risk analysis of FPSO-tanker offloading operation. In 21st International Conference on Offshore Mechanics & Arctic Engineering, Oslo, Norway, 23–28 June 2002. Google Scholar
- Coleman, T., Branch, M. A., & Grace, A. (1999). Optimization toolbox—for use with Matlab. The Mathworks Inc. Google Scholar
- Dempster, A. P. (1968). A generalization of Bayesian inference. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series B, 30, 205–247. Google Scholar
- Duckstein, L. (1994). Elements of fuzzy set analysis and fuzzy risk. In H. P. Nachtnebel (Ed.), Decision support systems in water resources management (pp. 410–430). Paris: UNESCO Press. Google Scholar
- Liu, J., Yang, J. B., Wang, J., & Sii, H. S. (2003). Review of uncertainty reasoning approaches as guidance for maritime and offshore safety-based assessment. Journal of UK Safety and Reliability Society, 23(1), 63–80. Google Scholar
- McCaul, J. R. (2001). Special report—floating production systems. Oil & Gas Journal, June, 11. Google Scholar
- Miettinen, K. (1999). Nonlinear multiobjective optimization. Boston: Kluwer Academic. Google Scholar
- Shafer, G. (1976). A mathematical theory of evidence. Princeton: Princeton University Press. Google Scholar
- Sii, H. S., & Wang, J. (2002). Safety assessment of FPSOs—The process of modelling system safety and case studies. Report of the project—The application of approximate reasoning methodologies to offshore engineering design (EPSRC GR/R30624 and GR/R32413), Liverpool John Moores University, UK. Google Scholar
- Smets, P. (1988). Belief function. In P. Smets, E. H. Mamdani, D. Dubois & H. Prade (Eds.), Non-standard logics for automated reasoning (pp. 253–277). London: Academic Press. Google Scholar