Validating DEA as a ranking tool: An application of DEA to assess performance in higher education
There is a general interest in ranking schemes applied to complex entities described by multiple attributes. Published rankings for universities are in great demand but are also highly controversial. We compare two classification and ranking schemes involving universities; one from a published report, ‘Top American Research Universities’ by the University of Florida's TheCenter and the other using DEA. Both approaches use the same data and model. We compare the two methods and discover important equivalences. We conclude that the critical aspect in classification and ranking is the model. This suggests that DEA is a suitable tool for these types of studies.
KeywordsNonparametric efficient frontiers Data envelopment analysis (DEA) Tiered data envelopment analysis (TDEA) Linear programming
Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.
- Adolphson, D.L., G.C. Cornia, and L.C. Walters. (1990). “A Unified Framework for Classifying DEA Models.” In H.E. Bradley (ed.), Operational Research ’90: Selected Papers from the Twelfth IFORS International Conference on Operational Research, Athens, Greece, 25 June 1990, PP. 647–657. Pergamon Press (1991).Google Scholar
- Ahn, T., V. Arnold, A. Charnes, and W.W. Cooper. (1989). “DEA and Ratio Efficiency Analyses for Public Institutions of Higher Learning in Texas.” Research in Governmental and Nonprofit Accounting, 5, 165–185.Google Scholar
- Ahn, T. and L.M. Seiford. (1993). “Sensitivity of DEA to Models and Variable Sets in a Hypothesis Test Setting: The Efficiency of University Operations.” Creative and Innovative Approaches to the Science of Management, Quorum Books: Westport, Connecticut, PP. 191–208.Google Scholar
- Barnett, V. (1976). “The Ordering of Multivariate Data.” J. Royal Statistical Soc. A, 139(Part 3), 318–344.Google Scholar
- Barr, R.S., M.L. Durchholz, and L. Seiford. (2000). “Peeling the DEA Onion: Layering and Rank-Ordering DMUs Using Tiered DEA.” Southern Methodist University Technical Report, USA.Google Scholar
- Caporaletti, L.E., J. H. Dulá, and N. K. Womer. (1999). Performance Evaluation Based on Multiple Attributes with Nonparametric Frontiers. Omega, 27, 637–645.Google Scholar
- Lombardi, J., E.D. Capaldi, D.D. Craig, L.N. Collis, D.S. Gater, and D.A. Roak. (2002). “The Top American Research Universities.” TheCenter's Annual Report, www.thecenter.ufl.edu.
- Zhu, J. (2001). Multidimensional Quality-of-Life Measure with an Application to Fortune's Best Cities. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 35(4), 263–284.Google Scholar
- Zhu, J. DEAFrontier, www.deafrontier.com.