Advertisement

Acta Mathematica Hungarica

, Volume 144, Issue 2, pp 285–352 | Cite as

A Theory of Stationary Trees and the Balanced Baumgartner–Hajnal–Todorcevic Theorem for Trees

  • A. M. Brodsky
Article

Abstract

Building on early work by Stevo Todorcevic, we develop a theory of stationary subtrees of trees of successor-cardinal height. We define the diagonal union of subsets of a tree, as well as normal ideals on a tree, and we characterize arbitrary subsets of a non-special tree as being either stationary or non-stationary.

We then use this theory to prove the following partition relation for trees:

Main Theorem. Let \({\kappa}\) be any infinite regular cardinal, let ξ be any ordinal such that \({2^{|\xi|} < \kappa}\), and let k be any natural number. Then
$$non-(2^{<\kappa})-special\, tree \rightarrow (\kappa + \xi)^{2}_k.$$
This is a generalization to trees of the Balanced Baumgartner–Hajnal–Todorcevic Theorem, which we recover by applying the above to the cardinal \({(2^{< \kappa})^{+}}\), the simplest example of a non-\({(2^{< \kappa})}\)-special tree.

As a corollary, we obtain a general result for partially ordered sets:

Theorem. Let \({\kappa}\) be any infinite regular cardinal, let ξ be any ordinal such that \({2^{|\xi|} < \kappa}\), and let k be any natural number. Let P be a partially ordered set such that \({P \rightarrow (2^{< \kappa})^{1}_{2^{< \kappa}} }\). Then
$$P \rightarrow (\kappa + \xi)^{2}_{k}.$$

Key words and phrases

nonspecial tree stationary tree stationary subtree partial order diagonal union regressive function normal ideal Pressing–Down Lemma partition relation partition calculus Erdös–Rado Theorem Baumgartner–Hajnal–Todorcevic Theorem elementary submodel non-reflecting ideal very nice collection 

Mathematics Subject Classification

primary 03E02 secondary 03C62 05C05 05D10 06A07 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Pavel Sergeevich Aleksandrov and Pavel Samuilovich Uryson, Mémoire sur les espaces topologiques compacts, Koninklijke Nederlandse Akademie van Wetenschappen te Amsterdam, Proceedings of the section of mathematical sciences, 14 (1929), pp. 1–96. Note supplémentaire, pp. 95–96.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    James Earl Baumgartner, Hajnal’s contributions to combinatorial set theory and the partition calculus, in: Set Theory: The Hajnal Conference, October 15–17, 1999 (Simon Thomas, ed.), DIMACS Series in Discrete Mathematics and Theoretical Computer Science, vol. 58, American Mathematical Society (Providence, Rhode Island, 2002), pp. 25–30.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    James Earl Baumgartner and András Hajnal, A proof (involving Martin’s axiom) of a partition relation, Fund. Math., 78 (1973), 193–203.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    James Earl Baumgartner, András Hajnal and Stevo B. Todorčević, Extensions of the Erdöos–Rado Theorem, in: Finite and Infinite Combinatorics in Sets and Logic, Proceedings of the NATO Advanced Study Institute held in Banff, Alberta, April 21–May 4, 1991 (N. W. Sauer, R. E. Woodrow and B. Sands, eds.), NATO Advanced Science Institutes Series C: Mathematical and Physical Sciences, vol. 411, Kluwer Academic Publishers Group (Dordrecht, 1993), pp. 1–17, preprint available at http://arxiv.org/abs/math/9311207.
  5. 5.
    James Earl Baumgartner, Jerome Irving Malitz and William Nelson Reinhardt, Embedding trees in the rationals, in: Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the USA, 67 (December, 1970), pp. 1748–1753.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    James Earl Baumgartner, Alan Dana Taylor and StanleyWagon, Structural Properties of Ideals, Dissertationes Mathematicae (Rozprawy Matematyczne) vol. 197, Polska Akademia Nauk, Instytut Matematyczny (Warszawa, 1982).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    Gérard Bloch, Sur les ensembles stationnaires de nombres ordinaux et les suites distinguées de fonctions régressives, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences, 236 (1953), 265–268.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ari Meir Brodsky, A Theory of Stationary Trees and the Balanced Baumgartner– Hajnal–Todorcevic Theorem for Trees, Ph.D. thesis, University of Toronto (2014).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Alan Stewart Dow, An introduction to applications of elementary submodels to topology, Topology Proc., 13 (1988), 17–72.MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Ben Dushnik, A note on transfinite ordinals, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 37 (1931), 860–862.CrossRefMATHMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Paul Erdös, András Hajnal, Attila Máté and Richard Rado, Combinatorial Set Theory: Partition Relations for Cardinals, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 106, North-Holland Publishing Company (Amsterdam, 1984).Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Paul Erdös and Richard Rado, A partition calculus in set theory, Bull. Amer. Math. Soc., 62 (1956), 427–489.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    David H. Fremlin, Consequences of Martin’s Axiom, Cambridge Tracts in Mathematics, vol. 84, Cambridge University Press (Cambridge, 1984).Google Scholar
  14. 14.
    Frederick William Galvin, On a Partition Theorem of Baumgartner and Hajnal, in: Infinite and Finite Sets, Part II, Colloquia Mathematica Societatis János Bolyai, vol. 10, North-Holland Publishing Company (Amsterdam, 1975), pp. 711–729.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    András Hajnal and Jean Ann Larson, Partition Relations, Handbook of Set Theory (M. Foreman and A. Kanamori, eds.), Springer Science+Business Media (2010), pp. 129–213.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Thomas J. Jech, Set Theory: The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded, Springer Monographs in Mathematics, Springer-Verlag (Berlin, 2003).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Winfried Just and Martin Weese, Discovering Modern Set Theory. II: Set-Theoretic Tools for Every Mathematician, Graduate Studies in Mathematics, vol. 18, American Mathematical Society (1997).Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Akihiro Kanamori, Partition relations for successor cardinals, Advances in Math., 59 (1986), 152–169.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Kenneth Kunen, Set Theory, Studies in Logic: Mathematical Logic and Foundations, vol. 34, College Publications (London, 2011).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Ðuro Kurepa, Ensembles ordonnés et ramifiés, Publications de l’Institut Mathématique Beograd, 4 (1935), pp. 1–138. Available (excluding p. 51) at http://elib.mi.sanu.ac.rs/files/journals/publ/4/1.pdf. Included (without the Appendix) in [22, pp. 12–114].
  21. 21.
    Ðuro Kurepa, Ensembles ordonnés et leurs sous-ensembles bien ordonnés, Comptes Rendus de l’Académie des Sciences de Paris, 242 (1956), 2202–2203. Included in [22, pp. 236–237].Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Aleksandar Ivić, Zlatko Mamuzić, Žarko Mijajlović and Stevo Todorčević, eds., Selected Papers of Ðuro Kurepa, Matematički Institut SANU (Serbian Academy of Sciences and Arts) (Beograd, 1996).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Jean Ann Larson, Infinite Combinatorics, Sets and Extensions in the Twentieth Century (Akihiro Kanamori, ed.), vol. 6 of Handbook of the History of Logic, North Holland (2012), pp. 145–357.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Eric C. Milner, The use of elementary substructures in combinatorics, Discrete Math.,136 (1994), 243–252.CrossRefMathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Walter Neumer, Verallgemeinerung eines Satzes von Alexandroff und Urysohn, Math. Zeitschrift, 54 (1951), 254–261.Google Scholar
  26. 26.
    Mary Ellen Rudin, Lectures on Set Theoretic Topology, Conference Board of the Mathematical Sciences Regional Conference Series in Mathematics, Number 23, American Mathematical Society (Providence, 1975).Google Scholar
  27. 27.
    Saharon Shelah, Notes on combinatorial set theory, Israel J. Math., 14 (1973), 262–277.Google Scholar
  28. 28.
    Saharon Shelah, A partition relation using strongly compact cardinals, Proc. Amer. Math. Soc., 131 (2003), 2585–2592.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Stevo B. Todorčević, Stationary sets, trees and continuums, Publications de l’Institut Mathématique Beograd, Nouvelle Série, 29 (43) (1981), 249–262. Available at http://elib.mi.sanu.ac.rs/files/journals/publ/49/n043p249.pdf.
  30. 30.
    Stevo B. Todorčević, Trees and Linearly Ordered Sets, Ch. 6 of Handbook of Set-Theoretic Topology (Kenneth Kunen and Jerry E. Vaughan, eds.), North-Holland Publishing Company (Amsterdam, 1984), pp. 235–293.Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Stevo B. Todorčević, Partition relations for partially ordered sets, Acta Math., 155 (1985), 1–25.Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Stevo B. Todorčević, Walks on Ordinals and Their Characteristics, Progress in Mathematics, vol. 263, Birkhäuser (Basel, 2007).Google Scholar
  33. 33.
    Neil Hale Williams, Combinatorial Set Theory, Studies in Logic and the Foundations of Mathematics, vol. 91, North-Holland Publishing Company (Amsterdam,1977).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of TorontoTorontoCanada

Personalised recommendations