Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing

, Volume 88, Issue 3, pp 455–463 | Cite as

A new decision tree approach of support vector machine for analog circuit fault diagnosis

Article
  • 259 Downloads

Abstract

This paper proposes a new decision tree approach for analog circuit fault diagnosis using binary support vector machines (BSVMs) that are trained by using different data sets. To evaluate the performance of those different BSVMs, a new criterion is defined by considering the weighted number of fault-pairs that can be separated by one BSVM. Specifically, the weight of each fault-pair is inversely proportional to the number of BSVMs that can separate it. Simulation results by using two example circuits demonstrate that the proposed approach achieves better performance in terms of accuracy and efficiency than existing approaches.

Keywords

Analog circuit fault diagnosis Support vector machine Decision tree approach 

References

  1. 1.
    Aminian, M., & Aminian, F. (2007). A modular fault-diagnostic system for analog electronic circuits using neural networks with wavelet transform as a preprocessor. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 56(5), 1546–1554.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Aminian, M., Aminian, F., & Collins, H. W. (2002). Analog fault diagnosis of actual circuits using neural networks. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 51(3), 544–550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Bengio, Y., & Grandvalet, Y. (2003). No unbiased estimator of the variance of K-fold cross-validation. Cirano Working Papers, 5(3), 1089–1105.MathSciNetMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Burges, C. J. C. (1998). A tutorial on support vector machines for pattern recognition. Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery, 2(2), 121–167.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Catelani, M., Fort, A., & Alippi, C. (2002). A fuzzy approach for soft fault detection in analog circuits. Measurement, 32(1), 73–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chapelle, O., Haffner, P., & Vapnik, V. N. (1999). Support vector machines for histogram-based image classification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 10(5), 1055–1064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Cui, J., & Wang, Y. (2010). A novel approach of analog fault diagnosis using a support vector machines classifier. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 17(4), 561–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Cui, J., & Wang, Y. (2011). Analog circuit fault classification using improved one-against-one support vector machines. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 18(4), 569–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Cui, J., & Wang, Y. (2011). A novel approach of analog circuit fault diagnosis using support vector machines classifier. Measurement, 44(1), 281–289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Dimopoulos, M. G., Spyronasios, A. D., Papakostas, D. K., & Hatzopoulos, A. A. (2010). Wavelet energy-based testing using supply current measurements. IET Science, Measurement and Technology, 4(2), 76–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Grzechca, D., & Rutkowski, J. (2009). Fault diagnosis in analog electronic circuits-the SVM approach. Metrology and Measurement Systems, 16(4), 583–598.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Han, H., Wang, H. J., Tian, S. L., & Zhang, N. (2013). A new analog circuit fault diagnosis method based on improved mahalanobis distance. Journal of Electronic Testing-Theory and Applications, 29(1), 95–102.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Hsu, C. W., & Lin, C. J. (2002). A comparison of methods for multi-class support vector machines. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 13(2), 415–425.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Li, F., & Woo, P. Y. (2002). Fault detection for linear analog IC-the method of short-circuit admittance parameters. IEEE Transactions on Circuits and Systems, 49(1), 105–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Liu, R. M., Liu, E. Q., Yang, J., Li, M., & Wang, F. L. (2006). Optimizing the hyper-parameters for SVM by combining evolution strategies with a grid search. Lecture Notes in Control and Information Sciences, 344, 712–721.CrossRefMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Long, B., Tian, S. L., & Wang, H. J. (2012). Feature vector selection method using mahalanobis distance for diagnostics of analog circuits based on LS-SVM. Journal of Electronic Testing-Theory and Applications, 28(5), 745–755.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Mohammadi, K., & Mahdavi, S. J. S. (2008). On improving training time of neural networks in mixed signal circuit fault diagnosis applications. Microelectronics Reliability, 48(5), 781–793.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Peng, M. F., Tse, C. K., Shen, M., & Xie, K. (2013). Fault diagnosis of analog circuits using systematic tests based on data fusion. Circuits Systems and Signal Processing, 32(2), 525–539.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Platt, J. C., Cristianini, N., & Shawe-Taylor, J. (2000). Large margin DAGs for multiclass classification. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, 12(3), 547–553.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Salat, R., & Osowski, S. (2003). Analog filter diagnosis using support vector machine. In Proceedings of ECCTD, Krakow, pp. 421–424.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Siwek, K., Osowski, S., & Markiewicz, T. (2006). Support vector machine for fault diagnosis in electrical circuits. In Proceedings of NORSIG, Reykjavik, pp. 342–345.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Tan, Y., & He, Y. (2008). A novel method for fault diagnosis of analog circuits based on WP and GPNN. International Journal of Electronics, 95(5), 432–439.Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    Zhang, Z., Duan, Z. M., Long, Y., & Yuan, L. F. (2014). A new swarm-SVM-based fault diagnosis approach for switched current circuit by using kurtosis and entropy as a preprocessor. Analog Integrated Circuits and Signal Processing, 81(1), 289–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Beihang UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.Huaibei Normal UniversityHuaibeiChina

Personalised recommendations