Grey systems theory applications to wireless communications

  • Ashwin Amanna
  • Matthew J. Price
  • Ratchaneekorn Thamvichai
Article

Abstract

This paper discusses grey systems theory (GST) applications in wireless communications and highlights its potential to cognitive radio. GST consists of information theory concepts and practical algorithms developed to address situations where information is incomplete and affected by random uncertainties. Two GST concepts, grey relational analysis (GRA) and grey model (GM) prediction theory are discussed. GRA provides a method to quantify the similarity between a reference data series and set of data while GM is used for modeling time series data and enables prediction of future values with limited data points and unknown probability distributions. These two techniques are surveyed with respect to their applications to wireless communications. Their application to predictive Cognitive Radio and as a similarity measure for case based reasoning cognitive engines is highlighted. A GRA based Automatic Modulation Classification (AMC) algorithm is applied to digital communications signals with preliminary results shown in simulation.

Keywords

Grey systems theory Grey relational analysis Modulation classification Case based reasoning Cognitive radio 

References

  1. 1.
    Ng, D. (1994). Grey system and grey relational model. ACM SIGICE Bulletin, 20, 2–9.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Liu, S., & Lin, Y. (2011). Introduction to grey systems theory. In Grey systems (Vol. 68, pp. 1–18). Berlin:Springer.Google Scholar
  3. 3.
    Lu, M., & Wevers, K. (2007). Grey systems theory and applications: A way forward. Journal of Grey Systems, 10, 47–54.Google Scholar
  4. 4.
    Lin, Y., & Liu, S. (2004). A historical introduction to grey systems theory. Presented at the 2004 IEEE international conference on systems, man and cybernetics.Google Scholar
  5. 5.
    Lin, Y., Chen, M.-y., & Liu, S. (2004). Theory of grey system: Capturing uncertainties of grey information. Kybernetes, 33, 196–218.Google Scholar
  6. 6.
    Jing, W. (2000). Application of grey system theory to tree growth prediction. Journal of Forestry Research, 11, 34–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Huang, S.-J., Chiu, N.-H., & Chen, L.-W. (2008). Integration of the grey relational analysis with genetic algorithm for software effort estimation. European Journal of Operational Research, 188, 898–909.MATHCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Rezaei, S. S. C., & Khalaj, B. H. (2005). Grey prediction based Handoff algorithm (Vol. 2). Los Alamitos: World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Shiann-Tsong, S. & Chih-Chiang, W. (2000). Using grey prediction theory to reduce handoff overhead in cellular communication systems. In Personal, indoor and mobile radio communications, 2000. PIMRC 2000. The 11th IEEE International Symposium, Vol. 2, pp. 782–786.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    Mitola, J. (2000). Cognitive radio—an integrated agent architecture for software defined radio. Stockholm: Teleinformatics, Royal Institute of Technology (KTH).Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Weingart, T., Sicker, D. C., & Grunwald, D. (2006). A predictive model for cognitive radio. In Military communications conference, 2006. MILCOM 2006. IEEE, pp. 1–7.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Kaneko, S., Nomoto, S., Ueda, T., Nomura, S., Takeuchi, K., & Sugiyama, K. (2007). Experimental verification on the prediction of the trend in radio resource availability in cognitive radio. In Vehicular technology conference, 2007. VTC-2007 Fall. 2007 IEEE 66th, pp. 1568–1572.Google Scholar
  13. 13.
    Qingyang, S., & Jamalipour, A. (2005). Network selection in an integrated wireless LAN and UMTS environment using mathematical modeling and computing techniques. IEEE Wireless Communications, 12, 42–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Linhai, Z., Hui, Z., & Xun, X. (2007). A spectrum identification method for UM71 signal based on grey relational analysis. In Proceedings of the 2007 IEEE international conference on grey systems and intelligent services, Nanjung China.Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    Rondeau, T. W. (2007). Application of artificial intelligence to wireless communications. Blacksburg: Doctor of Philosophy, Electrical and Computer Engineering, Virginia Tech.Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    Elbatsh, K. A., Lpez, E. M., & Samiento, A. S. (2008). RSSI gradient: New predictor and filter to support sporadic wireless service interruptions. In Communications systems and networks, Palma de Mallorca, Spain.Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    Yan-min, X., Hu-ping, Y., Jun, C., & Xue-yu, R. (2006). Application of grey relational analysis in sheet metal forming for multi-response quality characteristics. Journal of Zheijiang University Science A, 8, 805–811.Google Scholar
  18. 18.
    Dobre, O. A., Abdi, A., Bar-Ness, Y., & Su W. (2007). Survey of automatic modulation classification techniques: Classical approaches and new trends. IET Communications, 1.Google Scholar
  19. 19.
    Fehske, A., Gaeddert, J., & Reed, J. H. (2005). A new approach to signal classification using spectral correlation and neural networks. Presented at the DySPAN 2005.Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    Kim, N., Kehtarnavaz, N., Yeary, M. B., & Thornton, S. (2003). DSP-based hierarchical neural network modulation signal classification. IEEE Transactions on Neural Networks, 14, 1065–1071.Google Scholar
  21. 21.
    Maeda, K., Benjebbour, A., Asai, T., Furuno, T., & Ohya, T. (2007). Recognition among OFDM-based systems utilizing cyclostationarityinducing transmission. Proceedings of IEEE international symposium on new frontiers in dynamic spectrum access networks, April 2007, pp. 516–523.Google Scholar
  22. 22.
    Swami, A., & Sadler, B. M. (2000). Hierarchical digital modulation classification using cumulants. IEEE Transactions on Communication, 48, 416–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Spooner, C. M. (2001). On the utility of sixth-order cyclic cumulants for RF signal classification. Presented at the proceedings of the 35th asilomar conference on signals, systems, and computers.Google Scholar
  24. 24.
    Lin, C.-H., Du, Y.-C., Chen, Y.-F., & Chen, T.-S. (2006). Multiple ECG beats recognition in the frequency domain using grey relational analysis. Proceedings of the 28th IEEE EMBS annual international conference, New York City.Google Scholar
  25. 25.
    Gardner, W. (1988). Signal interception: A unifying theoretical framework for feature detection. IEEE Transactions on Communications, 36, 897–906.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Ramkumar, B. (2009). Automatic modulation classification for cognitive radios using cyclic feature detection. IEEE Circuits and Systems Magazine, 9, 27–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Xie, Y.-m., Yu, H.-p., Chen, J., & Ruan, X.-y. (2007). Application of grey relational analysis in sheet metal forming for multi-response quality characteristics. Journal of Zhejiang University - Science A, 8, 805–811.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Barreno, M., Cardenas, A., & Tygar, J. D. (2008). Optimal ROC curve for a combination of classifiers. Advances in Neural Information Processing Systems, pp. 57–64.Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Prakasam, P., & Madheswaran, M. (2008). Digital modulation identification model using wavelet transform and statistical parameters. Journal of Computer Networks & Communications, 2008, 1–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2011

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ashwin Amanna
    • 1
  • Matthew J. Price
    • 1
  • Ratchaneekorn Thamvichai
    • 2
  1. 1.Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State UniversityBlacksburgUSA
  2. 2.St. Cloud State UniversitySt. CloudUSA

Personalised recommendations