An enhanced folded cascode Op-Amp using positive feedback and bulk amplification in 0.35 μm CMOS process

  • Ali Dadashi
  • Shamin Sadrafshari
  • Khayrollah Hadidi
  • Abdollah Khoei
Article

Abstract

In this paper a new operational amplifier is presented which is based on the conventional folded cascode Op-Amp structure. A new method of positive feedback is used to increase dc-gain. This method does not limit the range of the output voltage swing. True performance of the Op-Amp in higher output voltage swings is another advantage of the proposed Op-Amp in comparison with the conventional structures. Bulk amplification and positive feedback are used to improve the Op-Amp specifications. Proposed structure has been simulated by HSPICE software using level 49 parameters (BSIM3v3) in a typical 0.35 μm CMOS technology. The HSPICE simulation confirms the theoretical estimated improvements.

Keywords

Folded cascode Bulk driven Positive feedback block Linearity 

Notes

Acknowledgment

The authors are grateful to reviewers for their valuable comments.

References

  1. 1.
    Gulati, K., & Lee, H.-S. (1998). A high-swing CMOS telescopic operational amplifier. IEEE J Solid-State Circuits, 33(12), 2010–2019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Nakamura, K., & Richard Carley, L. (1992). An enhanced fully differential folded-cascode Op-Amp. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 27(4), 563–568.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Musah, T., Gregoire, B. R., Naviasky, E., & Moon, U. (2007). Parallel correlated double sampling technique for pipelined analogue-to-digital converters. Electron Letter, 43(23), 1260–1261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Gregoire, B. R., & Moon, U. (2008). An over-60 dB true rail-to-rail performance using correlated level shifting and an opamp with only 30 dB loop gain. IEEE Journal of Soild-State Circuits, 43(12), 2620–2630.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Laber, C. A., & Gray, P. R. (1988). A positive-feedback transconductance amplifier with applications to high-frequency, high-Q CMOS switched-capacitor filters. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 23(6), 1370–1378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Ramirez-Angulo, J., Calvo, B., Carvajal, R., Lopez-Martin, A. (2010) Low-voltage gm-enhanced CMOS differential pairs using positive feedback (pp. 773–776). Paris, France: IEEE ISCASGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Razavi, B. (2001). Design of analog CMOS integrated circuits. McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    Gray, P. R., Hurst, P. J., Lewis, S. H., & Meyer, R. G. (2001). Analysis and design of analog integrated circuits. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    Mottaghi-Kashtiban, M., Hadidi, Kh., & Khoei, A. (2006). Modified CMOS Op-Amp with improved gain and bandwidth. IEICE Transactions on Electron, E89–C, 775–780.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zhang, M. M., & Hurst, P. J., (2006) Effect of nonlinearity in the CMFB circuit that uses the differential-difference amplifier. IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems, 1390–1393.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Guzinski, A., Bialko, M., & Matheau, J. C. (1987). Body driven differential amplifier for application in continuous-time active C-filter (pp. 315–319). Paris, France: Proc.ECCD.Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Blalock, B. J., et al., (1998). Designing 1-V op amps using standard digital cmos technology. Circuits and Systems II: Analog and Digital Signal Processing, 45, 769–780.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Ali Dadashi
    • 1
  • Shamin Sadrafshari
    • 1
  • Khayrollah Hadidi
    • 1
  • Abdollah Khoei
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of Electrical Engineering, Microelectronic Research LaboratoryUrmia UniversityUrmiaIran

Personalised recommendations