Algebra and Logic

, Volume 58, Issue 1, pp 1–14 | Cite as

Universal Enveloping Lie Rota–Baxter Algebras of Pre-Lie and Post-Lie Algebras

  • V. Yu. GubarevEmail author

Universal enveloping Lie Rota–Baxter algebras of pre-Lie and post-Lie algebras are constructed. It is proved that the pairs of varieties (RBLie, preLie) and (RBλLie, postLie) are PBW-pairs and that the variety of Lie Rota–Baxter algebras is not a Schreier variety.


pre-Lie algebra post-Lie algebra Rota–Baxter algebra universal enveloping algebra Lyndon–Shirshov word PBW-pair of varieties Schreier variety partially commutative Lie algebra 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    A. Cayley, “On the theory of analytic forms called trees,” in The Collected Mathematical Papers of Arthur Cayley, Vol. 3, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge (1890), pp. 242-246.Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    E. B. Vinberg, “The theory of homogeneous convex cones,” Tr. Mosk. Mat. Obs., 12, 303-358 (1963).MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    J.-L. Koszul, “Domaines bornés homogènes et orbites de groupes de transformations affines,” Bull. Soc. Math. Fr., 89, 515-533 (1961).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    M. Gerstenhaber, “The cohomology structure of an associative ring, Ann. Math. (2), 78, 267-288 (1963).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    C. Bai, Introduction to pre-Lie algebras, Preprint;
  6. 6.
    D. Burde, “Left-symmetric algebras, or pre-Lie algebras in geometry and physics,” Cent. Eur. J. Math., 4, No. 3, 323-357 (2006).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    D. Manchon, “A short survey on pre-Lie algebras,” in Noncommutative Geometry and Physics: Renormalization, Motives, Index Theory, A. Carey (ed.), EMS, Z¨urich (2011), pp. 89-102.Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    B. Vallette, “Homology of generalized partition posets,” J. Pure Appl. Alg., 208, No. 2, 699-725 (2007).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    J.-L. Loday, “Dialgebras,” in Dialgebras and Related Operads, Lect. Notes Math., J.-L. Loday et al. (eds.), 1763, Springer, Berlin (2001), pp. 7-66.Google Scholar
  10. 10.
    J.-L. Loday and M. Ronco, “Trialgebras and families of polytopes,” in Homotopy Theory: Relations with Algebraic Geometry, Group Cohomology, and Algebraic K-Theory, Contemp. Math., 346, P. Goerss et al. (eds.), Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2004), pp. 369-398.Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    D. Burde and K. Dekimpe, “Post-Lie algebra structures on pairs of Lie algebras,” J. Alg., 464, 226-245 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    K. Ebrahimi-Fard, A. Lundervold, and H. Z. Munthe-Kaas, “On the Lie enveloping algebra of a post-Lie algebra,” J. Lie Theory, 25, No. 4, 1139-1165 (2015).MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Yu Pan, Q. Liu, C. Bai, and L. Guo, “Post-Lie algebra structures on the Lie algebra sl(2,C),” El. J. Lin. Alg., 23, 180-197 (2012).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    C. Bai, O. Bellier, L. Guo, and X. Ni, “Splitting of operations, Manin products, and Rota–Baxter operators,” Int. Math. Res. Not., No. 3, 485-524 (2013).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    V. Yu. Gubarev and P. S. Kolesnikov, “Embedding of dendriform algebras into Rota–Baxter algebras,” Cent. Eur. J. Math., 11, No. 2, 226-245 (2013).MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    I. Z. Golubchik and V. V. Sokolov, “Generalized operator Yang–Baxter equations, integrable ODEs and nonassociative algebras,” J. Nonlin. Math. Phys., 7, No. 2, 184-197 (2000).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    M. Aguiar, “Pre-Poisson algebras,” Lett. Math. Phys., 54, No. 4, 263-277 (2000).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    C. Bai, L. Guo, and X. Ni, “Nonabelian generalized Lax pairs, the classical Yang–Baxter equation and Post-Lie algebras,” Comm. Math. Phys., 297, No. 2, 553-596 (2010).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    G. Baxter, “An analytic problem whose solution follows from a simple algebraic identity,” Pac. J. Math., 10, 731-742 (1960).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    A. A. Belavin and V. G. Drinfel’d, “Solutions of the classical Yang–Baxter equation for simple Lie algebras,” Funk. An. Prilozh., 16, No. 3, 1-29 (1982).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    M. A. Semenov-Tyan-Shanskii, “What is a classical r-matrix?” Funct. An. Appl., 17, No. 4, 17-33 (1983).MathSciNetGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    L. Guo, An Introduction to Rota–Baxter Algebra, Surv. Modern Math., 4, International Press, Somerville, MA (2012).Google Scholar
  23. 23.
    A. A. Mikhalev and I. P. Shestakov, “PBW-pairs of varieties of linear algebras,” Comm. Alg., 42, No. 2, 667-687 (2014).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    V. Yu. Gubarev, “Free Lie Rota–Baxter algebras,” Sib. Math. J., 57, No. 5, 809-818 (2016).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    V. Gubarev, “Universal enveloping Rota–Baxter algebras of preassociative and postassociative algebra,” J. Alg., 56, 298-328 (2018).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    D. Segal, “Free left-symmetric algebras and an analogue of the Poincaré–Birkhoff–Witt theorem,” J. Alg., 164, No. 3, 750-772 (1994).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    J.-M. Oudom and D. Guin, “On the Lie enveloping algebra of a pre-Lie algebra,” J. K-Theory, 2, No. 1, 147-167 (2008).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    F. Chapoton and M. Livernet, “Pre-Lie algebras and the rooted trees operad,” Int. Math. Res. Not., No. 8, 395-408 (2001).Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    D. Kh. Kozybaev and U. U. Umirbaev, “The Magnus embedding for right-symmetric algebras,” Sib. Math. J., 45, No. 3, 488-494 (2004).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    D. Kh. Kozybaev, “On the structure of universal multiplicative algebras of free rightsymmetric algebras,” Vest. Kaz. Nat. Univ., 54 No. 3, 3-9 (2007).Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    A. I. Shirshov, “On free Lie rings,” Mat. Sb., 45(87), No. 2, 113-122 (1958).Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    K. T. Chen, R. H. Fox, and R. C. Lyndon, “Free differential calculus. IV: The quotient groups of the lower central series,” Ann. Math., 68, No. 2, 81-95 (1958).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    F. Cartier and D. Foata, Problèmes Combinatoires de Commutation et Réarrangements, Lect. Notes Math., 85, Springer-Verlag, Berlin (1969).CrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    M. Casals-Ruiz and I. Kazachkov, On Systems of Equations over Free Partially Commutative Groups, Mem. Am. Math. Soc., 999, Am. Math. Soc., Providence, RI (2011).Google Scholar
  35. 35.
    V. Diekert and G. Rozenberg (eds.), The Book of Traces, World Scientific, Singapore (1995).Google Scholar
  36. 36.
    G. Duchamp and D. Krob, “The free partially commutative Lie algebra: Bases and ranks,” Adv. Math., 95, No. 1, 92-126 (1992).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    A. J. Duncan, I. V. Kazachkov, and V. N. Remeslennikov, “Automorphisms of partially commutative groups. I: Linear subgroups,” Groups Geom. Dyn., 4, No. 4, 739-757 (2010).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    K. H. Kim, L. Makar-Limanov, J. Neggers, and F. W. Roush, “Graph algebras,” J. Alg., 64, 46-51 (1980).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    E. N. Poroshenko, “Bases for partially commutative Lie algebras,” Algebra and Logic, 50, No. 5, 405-417 (2011).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    V. Gubarev and P. Kolesnikov, “Gröbner–Shirshov basis of the universal enveloping Rota–Baxter algebra of a Lie algebra,” J. Lie Theory, 27, No. 3, 887-905 (2017).MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    J. Qiu and Yu. Chen, “Gröbner–Shirshov bases for Lie Ω-algebras and free Rota–Baxter Lie algebras,” J. Alg. Appl., 16, No. 2 (2017), Article ID 1750190.Google Scholar
  42. 42.
    C. Reutenauer, Free Lie Algebras, London Math. Soc. Monogr. New Ser., 7, Clarendon Press, Oxford (1993).Google Scholar
  43. 43.
    D. Kozybaev, L. Makar-Limanov, and U. Umirbaev, “The Freiheitssatz and the automorphisms of free right-symmetric algebras,” Asian-Eur. J. Math., 1, No. 2, 243-254 (2008).MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sobolev Institute of MathematicsNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Novosibirsk State UniversityNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations