Advertisement

Algebras and Representation Theory

, Volume 20, Issue 3, pp 675–694 | Cite as

Koszul Duality for Semidirect Products and Generalized Takiff Algebras

  • Jacob Greenstein
  • Volodymyr Mazorchuk
Article
  • 70 Downloads

Abstract

We obtain Koszul-type dualities for categories of graded modules over a graded associative algebra which can be realized as the semidirect product of a bialgebra coinciding with its degree zero part and a graded module algebra for the latter. In particular, this applies to graded representations of the universal enveloping algebra of the Takiff Lie algebra (or the truncated current algebra) and its (super)analogues, and also to semidirect products of quantum groups with braided symmetric and exterior module algebras in case the latter are flat deformations of classical ones.

Keywords

Module algebras Semi-direct products Graded algebras Koszul duality 

Mathematics Subject Classification (2010)

16S37 16W50 17B10 17B70 

Preview

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

References

  1. 1.
    Bernšteı̆n, I.N., Gel′fand, I.M., Gel′fand, S.I.: A certain category of \(\mathfrak {g}\)-modules. Funkcional. Anal. i Priložen. 10(2), 1–8 (1976). (Russian)Google Scholar
  2. 2.
    Beilinson, A., Ginzburg, V., Soergel, W.: Koszul duality patterns in representation theory. J. Amer. Math. Soc. 9(2), 473–527 (1996)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Berenstein, A., Greenstein, J.: Quantum folding. Int. Math. Res. Not. 21, 4821–4883 (2011)MathSciNetzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Berenstein, A., Zwicknagl, S.: Braided symmetric and exterior algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 360(7), 3429–3472 (2008)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chari, V.: Minimal affinizations of representations of quantum groups: the rank 2 case. Publ. Res. Inst. Math. Sci. 31(5), 873–911 (1995)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Chari, V., Greenstein, J.: Current algebras, highest weight categories and quivers. Adv. Math. 216(2), 811–840 (2007)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Chari, V., Greenstein, J.: A family of Koszul algebras arising from finite-dimensional representations of simple Lie algebras. Adv. Math. 220(4), 1193–1221 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Chari, V., Khare, A., Ridenour, T.: Faces of polytopes and Koszul algebras. J. Pure Appl. Algebra 216(7), 1611–1625 (2012)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Collingwood, D.H., Irving, R.S.: A decomposition theorem for certain self-dual modules in the category 𝓞. Duke Math. J. 58(1), 89–102 (1989)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Freyd, P.: Representations in abelian categories. In: Proceedings of Conference Categorical Algebra (La Jolla, Calif., 1965), pp 95–120. Springer, New York (1966)Google Scholar
  11. 11.
    Humphreys, J.E.: Representations of semisimple Lie algebras in the BGG category 𝓞. In: Graduate studies in mathematics, vol. 94, p xvi+289. American Mathematical Society, Providence (2008)Google Scholar
  12. 12.
    Keller, B.: Deriving DG categories. Ann. Sci. École Norm. Sup. (4) 27(1), 63–102 (1994)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Kirillov, A.N., Reshetikhin, N.Yu.: Representations of Yangians and multiplicities of the inclusion of the irreducible components of the tensor product of representations of simple Lie algebras. Zap. Nauchn. Sem. Leningrad. Otdel. Mat. Inst. Steklov. (LOMI) 160, 211–221 (1987)zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Madsen, D.: On a common generalization of Koszul duality and tilting equivalence. Adv. Math. 227(6), 2327–2348 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Mazorchuk, V., Miemietz, V.: Cell 2-representations of finitary 2-categories. Compos. Math. 147(5), 1519–1545 (2011)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Mazorchuk, V., Ovsienko, S., Stroppel, C.: Quadratic duals, Koszul dual functors, and applications. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 361(3), 1129–1172 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Priddy, S.B.: Koszul resolutions. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 152, 39–60 (1970)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Takiff, S.J.: Rings of invariant polynomials for a class of Lie algebras. Trans. Amer. Math. Soc. 160, 249–262 (1971)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Zwicknagl, S.: R-matrix Poisson algebras and their deformations. Adv. Math. 220(1), 1–58 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Zwicknagl, S.: Equivariant quantizations of symmetric algebras. J. Algebra 322 (12), 4247–4282 (2009)MathSciNetCrossRefzbMATHGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of MathematicsUniversity of California RiversideRiversideUSA
  2. 2.Department of MathematicsUppsala UniversityUppsalaSweden

Personalised recommendations