Miami Thrives: Weaving a Poverty Reduction Coalition

  • Scotney D. EvansEmail author
  • Adam D. Rosen
  • Stacey M. Kesten
  • Wendy Moore
Original Article


In an environment where community based organizations are asked to do increasingly more to alleviate the effects of complex social problems, networks and coalitions are becoming the answer for increasing scale, efficiency, coordination, and most importantly, social impact. This paper highlights the formation of a poverty reduction coalition in south Florida. Our case study approach chronicles a developing coalition in Miami-Dade County and the role of one organization acting as lead to the initiative. Drawing on interviews with lead organization staff, participant observation field notes, network mapping and analysis of documents and artifacts from the initiative, we analyze the local organizational context and illuminate important processes associated with supporting a developing coalition. Findings offer a picture of the interorganizational relationships in the community using social network analysis and identify the organizational capacity factors that contribute to and inhibit the formation of a cohesive and effective coalition in this context. This study also highlights the utility of an action research approach to organizational learning about coalition-building in such a way that informs decision making.


Networks Coalitions Collective impact Organizational capacity Organizational empowerment Poverty 



This study was funded in part by the Kresge Foundation.


  1. Alexander, J. A., Comfort, M. E., Weiner, B. J., & Bogue, R. (2001). Leadership in collaborative community health partnerships. Nonprofit Management and Leadership, 12(2), 159–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bess, K. D., Speer, P. W., & Perkins, D. D. (2011). Ecological contexts in the development of coalitions for youth violence prevention: An organizational network analysis. Health Education and Behavior, 39(5), 526–537.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Bryson, J., & Crosby, B. (2005). Leadership for the common good: Tacking public problems in a shared-power world (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Bustamante, A. R., & Unterberger, A. (2013). Losing ground: A profile of Florida’s families in poverty. Miami, FL: Research Institute on Social and Economic Policy.Google Scholar
  5. Butterfoss, F. D., & Kegler, M. C. (2009). Community coalition action theory. In R. J. DiClemente, R. A. Crosby, & M. C. Kegler (Eds.), Emerging theories in health promotion practice and research: Strategies for improving public health (pp. 238–276). Hoboken, NJ: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  6. Butterfoss, F. D., Lachance, L. L., & Orians, C. E. (2006). Building allies coalitions: Why formation matters. Health Promotion Practice, 7(2 suppl), 23S–33S.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chaskin, R. J., Brown, P., Venkatesh, S., & Vidal, A. (2001). Building community capacity. New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
  8. Coleman, J. S. (1988). Social capital in the creation of human capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94, S95–S120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Crutchfield, L., & Grant, H. M. (2007). Forces for good: The six practices of high-impact nonprofits (1st ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  10. Florin, P., Mitchell, R., & Stevenson, J. (1993). Identifying training and technical assistance needs in community coalitions: A developmental approach. Health Education Research, 8(3), 417–432.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Florin, P., Mitchell, R., Stevenson, J., & Klein, I. (2000). Predicting intermediate outcomes for prevention coalitions: A developmental perspective. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23, 341–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Foster-Fishman, P., Berkowitz, S., Lounsbury, D., Jacobson, S., & Allen, N. (2001). Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions: A review and integrative framework. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 241–261.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Freeman, L. C. (1979). Centrality in social networks: Conceptual clarification. Social Networks, 1, 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Gerschick, T. J., Israel, B. A., & Checkoway, B. N. (1990). Means of empowerment in individuals, organizations, and communities. Ann Arbor, MI: Program on Conflict Management Alternatives, University of Michigan.Google Scholar
  15. Granner, M. L., & Sharpe, P. A. (2004). Evaluating community coalition characteristics and functioning: A summary of measurement tools. Health Education Research, 19(5), 514–532. doi: 10.1093/her/cyg056.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gray, B. (1989). Collaborating: Finding common ground for multiparty problems. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  17. Hanleybrown, F., Kania, J., & Kramer, M. (2012). Channeling change: Making collective impact work. Stanford Social Innovation Review.Google Scholar
  18. Harel, D., & Koren, Y. (2002). A fast multiscale method for drawing large graphs. Journal of Graph Algorithms and Applications, 6(3), 179–202.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Huzzard, T., Ahlberg, B. M., & Ekman, M. (2010). Constructing interorganizational collaboration. Action Research, 8(3), 293–314. doi: 10.1177/1476750309335206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Jones, C., Hesterly, W. S., & Borgatti, S. P. (1997). A general theory of network governance: Exchange conditions and social mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 22(4), 911–945.Google Scholar
  21. Kania, K., & Kramer, M. (2010). Collective impact. Stanford Social Innovation Review, December. Retrieved from
  22. Kegler, M. C., Rigler, J., & Honeycutt, S. (2010). How does community context influence coalitions in the formation stage? A multiple case study based on the Community Coalition Action Theory. BMC Public Health, 10(1), 1–11.Google Scholar
  23. Knoke, D., & Wood, J. (1981). Organized for action: Commitment in voluntary associations. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Krebs, V., & Holley, J. (2006). Building smart communities through network weaving. Athens, OH: Appalachian Center for Economic Networks.Google Scholar
  25. Larkin, M., Watts, S., & Clifton, E. (2006). Giving voice and making sense in interpretative phenomenological analysis. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 102–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Leviten-Reid, E. (2008). Bringing vibrant communities to life: The founding years. In P. Born (Ed.), Creating vibrant communities: How individuals and organizations from diverse sectors of society are coming together to reduce poverty in Canada (pp. 15–59). Toronto, ON: BPS Books.Google Scholar
  27. Lusher, D., Robins, G., & Kremer, P. (2010). The application of social network analysis to team sports. Measurement in Physical Education and Exercise Science, 14(4), 211–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Maton, K. I. (2008). Empowering community settings: Agents of individual development, community betterment, and positive social change. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41(1–2), 4–21.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Maton, K. I., & Salem, D. A. (1995). Organizational characteristics of empowering community settings: A multiple case study approach. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 631–656.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. McCarthy, J. D., & Zald, M. N. (1977). Resource mobilization and social movements: A partial theory. American Journal of Sociology, 82, 1212–1241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. McGuire, M. (2002). Managing networks: Propositions on what managers do and why they do it. Public Administration Review, 62(5), 599–609.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. National Conference on Citizenship. (2010). A tale of two cities: Civic Health in Miami and Minneapolis-St. Paul. Washington, DC.
  33. Norris, T. (2001). America’s communities movement: Investing in the civic landscape. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29, 301–307.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Nowell, B. (2009). Profiling capacity for coordination and systems change: The relative contribution of stakeholder relationships in interorganizational collaboratives. American Journal of Community Psychology, 44(3–4), 196–212.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Peterson, N. A., & Zimmerman, M. A. (2004). Beyond the individual: Toward a nomological network of organizational empowerment. American Journal of Community Psychology, 34(1), 129–145.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Plastrik, P., & Taylor, M. (2006). Net gains: A handbook for network builders seeking social change. Retrieved from
  37. Provan, K. G., Veazie, M. A., Staten, L. K., & Teufel-Shone, N. I. (2005). The use of network analysis to strengthen community partnerships. Public Administration Review, 65(5), 603–613. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2005.00487.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Quatman, C., & Chelladurai, P. (2008). Social network theory and analysis: A complementary lens for inquiry. Journal of Sport Management, 22(3), 338–360.Google Scholar
  39. Smith, M., Milic-Frayling, N., Shneiderman, B., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Leskovec, J., & Dunne, C. (2010). NodeXL: A free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010.
  40. Smith, J. A., & Osborn, M. (2003). Interpretative phenomenological analysis. In J. A. Smith (Ed.), Qualitative psychology: A practical guide to methods. London: Sage.Google Scholar
  41. Swift, C., & Levin, G. (1987). Empowerment: An emerging mental health technology. Journal of Primary Prevention, 8, 71–92.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Taschereau, S., & Bolger, J. (2007). Networks and capacity. (Discussion Paper 58C). Maastricht: ECDPM. Retrieved from
  43. Turner, S., Merchant, K., Kania, J., & Martin, E. (2012, July). Understanding the value of backbone organizations in collective impact: Part 2. Retrieved from
  44. U.S. Census Bureau. (2012). Household income inequality within U.S. counties: 2006–2010 (No. ACSBR/10-18).Google Scholar
  45. Wandersman, A., Goodman, R. M., & Butterfoss, F. D. (1997). Understanding coalitions and how they operate. In M. Minkler (Ed.), Community organizing and community building for health (pp. 261–277). New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Weber, E. P., & Khademian, A. M. (2008). Wicked problems, knowledge challenges, and collaborative capacity builders in network settings. Public Administration Review, 68(2), 334–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Zimmerman, M. A. (2000). Empowerment theory: Psychological, organizational, and community levels of analysis. In J. Rappaport & E. Seidman (Eds.), Handbook of community psychology (pp. 43–63). New York: Plenum.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Community Research and Action 2014

Authors and Affiliations

  • Scotney D. Evans
    • 1
    Email author
  • Adam D. Rosen
    • 1
  • Stacey M. Kesten
    • 1
  • Wendy Moore
    • 1
  1. 1.University of MiamiCoral GablesUSA

Personalised recommendations