The (In)compatibility of Diversity and Sense of Community
- 1.3k Downloads
Community psychologists are interested in creating contexts that promote both respect for diversity and sense of community. However, recent theoretical and empirical work has uncovered a community-diversity dialectic wherein the contextual conditions that foster respect for diversity often run in opposition to those that foster sense of community. More specifically, within neighborhoods, residential integration provides opportunities for intergroup contact that are necessary to promote respect for diversity but may prevent the formation of dense interpersonal networks that are necessary to promote sense of community. Using agent-based modeling to simulate neighborhoods and neighborhood social network formation, we explore whether the community-diversity dialectic emerges from two principles of relationship formation: homophily and proximity. The model suggests that when people form relationships with similar and nearby others, the contexts that offer opportunities to develop a respect for diversity are different from the contexts that foster a sense of community. Based on these results, we conclude with a discussion of whether it is possible to create neighborhoods that simultaneously foster respect for diversity and sense of community.
KeywordsDiversity Sense of community Agent-based modeling Social networks
The authors wish to thank the staff at the High Performance Computing Center at Michigan State University for their technical assistance.
- Allport, G. W. (1954). The nature of prejudice. Cambridge, MA: Perseus Books.Google Scholar
- Burt, R. S. (2001). Structural holes versus network closure as social capital. In N. Lin & R. S. Burt (Eds.), Social capital: Theory and research (pp. 31–56). New York: Aldine de Gruyter.Google Scholar
- Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K. (1950). Social pressures in informal groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. New York: Harper & Brothers.Google Scholar
- Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class: And how it’s transforming work, leisure, community, and everyday life. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
- Grannis, R. (2009). From the ground up: Translating geography into community through neighbor networks. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Hewstone, M., & Brown, R. (Eds.). (1986). Contact and conflict in intergroup encounters: Social psychology and society. Cambridge, MA: Basil Blackwell.Google Scholar
- Lazarsfeld, P. F., & Merton, R. K. (1964). Friendship as a social process: A substantive and methodological analysis. In M. Berger, T. Abel, & C. H. Page (Eds.), Freedom and control in modern society (pp. 18–66). New York: Octagon Books.Google Scholar
- Lindblad, M. R., Manturuk, K. R., & Quercia, R. G. (2013). Sense of community and informal social control among lower income households: The role of homeownership and collective efficacy in reducing subjective neighborhood crime and disorder. American Journal of Community Psychology, 51, 123–139.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Putnam, R. D. (2001). Bowling alone: the collapse and revival of American community. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
- Rappaport, J. (1977). Community psychology: Values, research, and action. New York: Holt, Rinehart, & Winston.Google Scholar
- Ryan, W. (1976). Blaming the victim. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
- Sarason, S. B. (1974). The psychological sense of community: Prospects for a community psychology. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Schelling, T. (1969). Models of segregation. American Economic Review, 59(2), 488–493.Google Scholar
- Sigelman, L., & Welch, S. (1993). The contact hypothesis revisited: Black-white interaction and positive racial attitudes. Social Forces, 71(3), 781–795.Google Scholar
- Society for Community Research and Action. (2010). Policies and procedures manual. Retrieved from: http://www.scra27.org/documents/scradocume/policiesandproceduresmanualrevisedjuly2010pdf.
- Trickett, E. J., Watts, R. J., & Birman, D. (1994). Toward an overarching framework for diversity. In E. J. Trickett, R. J. Watts, & D. Birman (Eds.), Human diversity: Perspectives on people in context (pp. 7–26). San Francisco: Jossey Bass.Google Scholar
- Wilensky, U. (1999). NetLogo. Center for connected learning and computer-based modeling. Evanston, IL: Northwestern University.Google Scholar