Practical Implementation Science: Developing and Piloting the Quality Implementation Tool
According to the Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation, implementation is a major mechanism and concern in bridging research and practice. The growing number of implementation frameworks need to be synthesized and translated so that the science and practice of quality implementation can be furthered. In this article, we: (1) use the synthesis of frameworks developed by Meyers et al. (Am J Commun Psychol, 2012) and translate the results into a practical implementation science tool to use for improving quality of implementation (i.e., the Quality Implementation Tool; QIT), and (2) present some of the benefits and limitations of the tool by describing how the QIT was implemented in two different pilot projects. We discuss how the QIT can be used to guide collaborative planning, monitoring, and evaluation of how an innovation is implemented.
KeywordsImplementation Knowledge utilization Practical implementation science Implementation tool Interactive Systems Framework
- Carnevale, A. P., Gainer, L. E., & Meltzer, A. S. (1990). Work-place basics: The essential skills employers want. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass Publishers.Google Scholar
- Cherniss, C., (April 15, 2000). Emotional intelligence: What it is and why it matters. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Industrial and Organizational Psychology, New Orleans, LA.Google Scholar
- Chien, V. C. (2010). Training for outcomes: Towards an evidence-informed approach for training effectiveness (in preparation).Google Scholar
- Chinman, M., Imm, P., & Wandersman, A. (2004). Getting to outcomes 2004: Promoting accountability through methods and tools for planning, implementation, and evaluation. (No. TR-TR101). Santa Monica, CA: RAND.Google Scholar
- Damschroder, L. J., Aron, D. C., Keith, R. E., Kirsh, S. R., Alexander, J. A., & Lowery, J. C. (2009). Fostering implementation of health services research findings into practice: A consolidated framework for advancing implementation science. Implementation Science, 4, 50.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Duffy, J. L., Prince, M. S., Johnson, E. E., Alton, F. L., Flynn, S., Mattison Faye, A., et al. (2012). Enhancing teen pregnancy prevention in local communities: Capacity building using the Interactive Systems Framework. American Journal of Community Psychology (this issue).Google Scholar
- Fixsen, D. L., Blase, K. A., Timbers, G. D., & Wolf, M. M. (2001). In search of program implementation: 792 replications of the Teaching-Family Model. In G. A. Bernfeld, D. P. Farrington, & A. W. Leschied (Eds.), Offender rehabilitation in practice: Implementing and evaluating effective programs (pp. 149–166). London: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Fixsen, D. L., Naoom, S. F., Blase, K. A., Friedman, R. M., & Wallace, F. (2005). Implementation research: A synthesis of the literature. Tampa, FL: University of South Florida, Louis de la Parte Florida Mental Health Institute, The National Implementation Research Network. (FMHI Publication #231).Google Scholar
- Forsner, T., Hansson, J., Brommels, M., Wistedt, A. A., & Forsell (2010). Implementing clinical guidelines in psychiatry: a qualitative study of perceived facilitators and barriers. BMC Psychiatry, 10(8). doi:10.1186/1471-244x-10-8.
- Goodman, R. M., Speers, M. A., McLeroy, K., Fawcett, S., Kegler, M., Parker, E., et al. (1998). Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Education & Behavior, 25(3), 258–278.Google Scholar
- Greenberg, M. T., Domitrovich, C. E., Graczyk, P. A., & Zins, J. E. (2005). The study of implementation in school-based preventive interventions: Theory, research, and practice (Vol. 3). DHHS Pub. No. (SMA) __________. Rockville, MD: Center for Mental Health Services, Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. Retrieved from http://casel.org/wp-content/uploads/2011/04/Implementation-VOL-31.pdf.
- Hall, G. E., & Hord, S. M. (2010). Implementing change: Patterns, principles and potholes (3rd ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.Google Scholar
- Hernandez, M., Gomez, A., Lipien, L., Greenbaum, P. E., Armstrong, K. H., & Gonzalez, P. (2001). Use of the system-of-care practice review in the national evaluation: Evaluating the fidelity of practice to system-of-care principles. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 9, 43–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- International Organization for Standardization. (1998). ISO/IEC International Standard 13236: Information technology—Quality of service: Framework (1st ed.).Google Scholar
- Klein, K. J., & Sorra, J. S. (1996). The challenge of innovation implementation. Academy of Management Review, 21, 1055–1080.Google Scholar
- McGehee, W., & Thayer, P. W. (1961). Training in business and industry. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
- Meyers, D. C., Durlak, J., & Wandersman, A. (2012). The Quality Implementation Framework: A synthesis of critical steps in the implementation process. American Journal of Community Psychology. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9522-x.
- Mihalic, S., Fagan, A. A., Irwin, K., Ballard, D., & Elliott, D. (2004). Blueprints for violence prevention. Washington, DC: Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention.Google Scholar
- Miller, W. R., & Rollnick, S. (2002). Motivational interviewing: Preparing people for change. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Mowbray, C. T., Holter, M. C., Teague, G. B., & Bybee, D. (2003). Fidelity criteria: Development, measurement, and validation. American Journal of Evaluation, 24, 315–340.Google Scholar
- Noe, R. A. (2010). Employee training and development (5th ed.). Boston, MA. Irwin/McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
- Saunders, R. P., Ward, D., Felton, G. M., Dowda, M., & Pate, R. R. (2006). Examining the link between program implementation and behavior outcomes in the lifestyle education for activity program (LEAP). Evaluation and Program Planning, 29, 352–364.Google Scholar
- Schorr, L. B. (2003). Determining ‘‘what works’’ in social programs and social policies: Toward a more inclusive knowledge base. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
- Smith, J. D., Schneider, B. H., Smith, P. K., & Ananiadou, K. (2004). The effectiveness of whole-school antibullying programs: A synthesis of evaluation research. School Psychology Review, 33, 547–560.Google Scholar
- Wandersman, A., Chien, V., & Katz. J. (2012). Toward an evidence-based system for innovation support for implementing innovations with quality: Tools, training, technical assistance, and quality assurance/quality improvement. American Journal of Community Psychology, 1–15. doi:10.1007/s10464-012-9509-7.
- Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The Interactive Systems Framework for Dissemination and Implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171–181. Google Scholar
- Wandersman, A., Imm, P., Chinman, M., & Kaftarian, S. (2000). Getting to outcomes: A results-based approach to accountability. Evaluation and program planning, 23, 389–395.Google Scholar
- White, W. (2008). Recovery management and recovery-oriented systems of care: Scientific rationale and promising practices. Northeast Addiction Technology Transfer Center, Great Lakes Addiction Technology Transfer Center, Philadelphia Department of Behavioral Health/Mental Retardation Services.Google Scholar