Evaluating New York City’s Smoke-Free Parks and Beaches Law: A Critical Multiplist Approach to Assessing Behavioral Impact
This article describes the evaluation of the law banning smoking in New York City’s parks and beaches that went into effect in 2011. We discuss the practical and methodological challenges that emerged in evaluating this law, and describe how we applied the principles of critical multiplism to address these issues. The evaluation uses data from three complementary studies, each with a unique set of strengths and weaknesses that can provide converging evidence for the effectiveness of the law. Results from a litter audit and an observational study suggest the ban reduced smoking in parks and beaches. The purpose, methodology and baseline results from an ongoing survey that measures how frequently adults in NYC and across New York State notice people smoking in parks and on beaches are presented and discussed. Limitations are considered and suggestions are offered for future evaluations of similar policies.
KeywordsEnvironmentally-based interventions Critical multiplism Tobacco control Outdoor smoking bans
- Americans for Nonsmokers’ Rights. (2011). Outdoor area lists: as of July 1, 2011. Retrieved from http://no-smoke.org/goingsmokefree.php?id=519#outdoor.
- Blankertz, L. (1998). The value and practicality of deliberate sampling for heterogeneity: A critical multiplist perspective. American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 307–324.Google Scholar
- Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. NY: Academic Press.Google Scholar
- Cook, T. D. (1985). Post-positivistic critical multiplism. In L. Shotland & M. M. Mark (Eds.), Social science and social policy. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Cook, T. D. (1990). The generalization of causal connections: Multiple theories in search of clear practice. In L. Sechrest, J. Bunker, & E. Perrin (Eds.), Research methodology: Strengthening causal interpretation of non-experimental data. Rockville, MD: Agency for Health Care Policy & Research.Google Scholar
- Kennedy, R. D., Fong, G. T., Thompson, M. E., Kaufman, P., Ferrence, R., & Schwartz, R. (2010). Evaluation of a comprehensive outdoor smoking by-law: A longitudinal study of smokers and non-smokers in the Canadian city of Woodstock. Poster presented at the annual meeting of the Society for Research on Nicotine and Tobacco, Baltimore, MD.Google Scholar
- Novotny, T. E., Lum, K., Smith, E., Wang, V., & Barnes, R. (2009). Cigarette butts and the case for an environmental policy on hazardous cigarette waste. International Journal of Research and Public Health, 6, 1–15.Google Scholar
- Shadish, W. R. (1993). Critical multiplism: A research strategy and its attendant tactics. New Directions for Evaluation, 60, 13–57.Google Scholar
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.Google Scholar
- Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Houts, A. C. (1986). Quasi-experimentation in a critical multiplist mode. In W. M. K. Trochim (Ed.), Advances in quasi-experimental design and analysis (pp. 29–46). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
- Webb, E. J., Campbell, D. T., Schwarzt, R. D., & Sechrest, L. (1961). Unobtrusive measures. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar