Channels of Change: Contrasting Network Mechanisms in the Use of Interventions

  • Jennifer Watling Neal
  • Zachary P. Neal
  • Marc S. Atkins
  • David B. Henry
  • Stacy L. Frazier
Original Paper

Abstract

This study informs community science, and seeks to narrow the research-to-practice gap, by examining how the interpersonal networks within a setting influence individuals’ use of interventions. More specifically, it explores the role of two network mechanisms—cohesion and structural similarity—in urban elementary school teachers’ use of interventions designed to improve academic and behavioral outcomes for students. Lagged regression models examine how position in advice giving networks influenced weekly use of the daily report card and peer assisted learning by kindergarten through fourth grade teachers in three schools. Results indicate that intervention use spreads among teachers with similar patterns of advice-giving relationships (i.e., via structural similarity), rather than from teachers who are sources of advice (i.e., via cohesion). These results are consistent with findings in other settings, and suggest that researchers wishing to increase the use of an intervention should select change agents based on their patterns of their relationships, rather than on their direct connections.

Keywords

Social networks Diffusion Implementation Schools Interventions 

References

  1. Armbruster, P., & Lichtman, J. (1999). Are school based mental health services effective? Evidence from 36 inner city schools. Community Mental Health Journal, 35, 493–504.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Atkins, M. S., Frazier, S. L., Birman, D., Adil, J. A., Jackson, M., Graczyk, P. A., et al. (2006). School-based mental health services for children living in high poverty urban communities. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33, 146–159.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkins, M. S., Frazier, S. L., Leathers, S. J., Talbott, E., Adil, J. A., Demirtas, H., et al. (2008a). Teacher key opinion leaders and mental health consultation in low-income urban schools. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 76(5), 905–908.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Atkins, M. S., Graczyk, P. A., Frazier, S. L., & Alil, J. A. (2003). Toward a new model for promoting urban children’s mental health: Accessible, effective, and sustainable school-based mental health services. School Psychology Review, 32(4), 503–514.Google Scholar
  5. Atkins, M. S., Mehta, T., Frazier, S. L., Cappella, E., Maríñez-Lora, A., Shernoff, E., et al. (2008b). Links to Learning: School and community mental health resource alignment in support of children’s learning in high-poverty urban schools. Boston, MA: Paper symposium at the annual meeting of the American Psychological Association.Google Scholar
  6. Barth, R. (1979). Home-based reinforcement of school behavior: A review and analysis. Review of Educational Research, 49(3), 436–458.Google Scholar
  7. Bidwell, C. E. (2001). Analyzing schools as organizations: Long-term permanence and short-term change. Sociology of Education, 74, 100–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bidwell, C. E., & Yasamoto, J. Y. (1999). The collegial focus: Teaching fields, collegial relationships, and instructional practice in American high schools. Sociology of Education, 72(4), 234–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Borgatti, S., Everett, M., & Freeman, L. (2002). UCINET for Windows: Software for social network analysis. Harvard, MA: Analytic Technologies.Google Scholar
  10. Boyd, W. L., & Shouse, R. C. (1997). The problems and promise of urban schools. In H. J. Walberg, O. Reyes, & R. P. Weissberg (Eds.), Children and youth: Interdisciplinary perspectives. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  11. Burt, R. S. (1987). Social contagion and innovation: Cohesion versus structural equivalence. The American Journal of Sociology, 92(6), 1287–1335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Burt, R. S. (1999). The social capital of opinion leaders. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 566, 37–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cappella, E., Frazier, S. L., Atkins, M. S., Schoenwald, S. K., & Glisson, C. (2008). Enhancing schools’ capacity to support children in poverty: An ecological model of school-based mental health services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 35, 395–409.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cheetham, A. H., & Hazel, J. E. (1969). Binary (presence-absence) similarity coefficients. Journal of Paleontology, 43(5), 1130–1136.Google Scholar
  15. Coleman, J., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. (1957). The diffusion of an innovation among physicians. Sociometry, 20(4), 253–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Coleman, J., Katz, E., & Menzel, H. (1966). Medical innovation: A diffusion study. New York: Bobbs Merrill.Google Scholar
  17. Dearing, J. W. (2008). Evolution of diffusion and dissemination theory. Journal of Public Health Management and Practice, 14(2), 99–108.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. DiMaggio, P. J., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The Iron Cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48(2), 147–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Flaspohler, P., Anderson-Butcher, D., Paternite, C. E., Weist, M., & Wandersman, A. (2006). Community science and expanded school mental health: Bridging the research to practie gap to promote child well being and academic success. Educational and Child Psychology, 23(1), 27–41.Google Scholar
  20. Flay, B. R., Biglan, A., Boruch, R. F., Castro, F. G., Gottfredson, D., Kellam, S., et al. (2005). Standards of evidence: Criteria for efficacy, effectiveness, and dissemination. Prevention Science, 6, 151–175.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Frank, K. A., Zhao, Y., & Borman, K. (2004). Social capital and the diffusion of innovations within organizations: The case of computer technology in schools. Sociology of Education, 77, 148–171.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Friedkin, N. E. (1993). Structural bases of interpersonal influence in groups: A longitudinal case study. American Sociological Review, 58, 861–872.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Friedkin, N. E. (1998). A structural theory of social influence. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fuchs, D., & Fuchs, L. S. (2005). Peer-assisted learning strategies: Promoting word recognition, fluency, and reading comprehension in young children. The Journal of Special Education, 39(1), 34–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Galaskiewicz, J., & Burt, R. S. (1991). Interorganization contagion in corporate philanthropy. Administrative Science Quarterly, 36, 88–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Rohrbeck, C. A., & Fantuzzo, J. W. (2006). A meta-analytic review of social, self-concept, and behavioral outcomes of peer-assisted learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98(4), 732–749.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Glasgow, R. E., Lichtenstein, E., & Marcus, A. C. (2003). Why don’t we see more translation of health promotion research to practice? Rethinking the efficacy-to-effectiveness transition. American Journal of Public Health, 93, 1261–1267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gujarati, D. N. (2003). Basic econometrics (4th ed.). Boston, MA: McGraw Hill.Google Scholar
  29. Hawley, A. (1968). Human ecology. In D. L. Sills (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences (pp. 328–337). New York: MacMillan.Google Scholar
  30. Heinz, J. P., Laumann, E. O., Nelson, R. L., & Salisbury, R. H. (1993). The hollow core. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  31. Helm, S., & Flaspohler, P. (2008). Systems change through school-community partnerships. The Community Psychologist, 41(2), 38–39.Google Scholar
  32. Kelley, M. L. (1990). School-home notes: promoting children’s classroom success. New York: The Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  33. Kloos, B. (2005). Community science: Creating an alternative place to stand? American Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 259–267.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Luke, D. A. (2005). Getting the big picture in community science: Methods that capture context. American Journal of Community Psychology, 35, 185–200.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Marsden, P. V., & Friedkin, N. E. (1994). Network studies of social influence. In S. Wasserman & J. Galaskiewicz (Eds.), Advances in social network analysis (pp. 3–25). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  36. Mrazek, P. J., & Haggerty, R. J. (Eds.). (1994). Summary: Reducing risks for mental health disorders: Frontiers for preventive intervention research. Washington, D.C.: Institute of Medicine.Google Scholar
  37. Neal, J. W., Shernoff, E. S., Frazier, S. L., Stachowicz, E., Frangos, R., & Atkins, M. S. (2008). Change from within: Engaging teacher key opinion leaders in the diffusion of interventions in urban schools. The Community Psychologist, 41(2), 53–57.Google Scholar
  38. Owens, J. S., Richerson, L., Beilstein, E. A., Crane, A., Murphy, C. E., & Vancouver, J. B. (2005). School-based mental health programming for children with inattentive and disruptive behavior problems: First-year treatment outcome. Journal of Attention Disorders, 9, 261–274.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rogers, E. M. (1995). Diffusion of innovations (4th ed.). New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
  40. Rohrbeck, C. A., Ginsburg-Block, M. D., Fantuzzo, J. W., & Miller, T. R. (2003). Peer-assisted learning interventions with elementary school students: A meta-analytic review. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95(2), 240–257.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Rones, M., & Hoagwood, K. (2000). School-based mental health services: A research review. Clinical Child and Family Psychology Review, 3(4), 223–241.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Simpson, D. D. (2002). A conceptual framework for transferring research to practice. Journal of Substance Abuse Treatment, 22, 171–182.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Stevenson, W. B., & Bartunek, J. M. (1996). Power, interaction, position, and the generation of cultural agreement in organizations. Human Relations, 49(1), 75–104.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Strang, D., & Soule, S. A. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24, 265–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Valente, T. W. (1995). Network models of the diffusion of innovations. Creskill, NJ: Hampton Press.Google Scholar
  46. Valente, T. W., Hoffman, B. R., Ritt-Olsen, A., Lichtman, K., & Johnson, C. A. (2003). Effects of a social-network method for group assignment strategies on peer-led tobacco prevention programs in schools. American Journal of Public Health, 93(11), 1837–1843.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Wandersman, A. (2003). Community science: Bridging the gap between science and practice within community-centered models. American Journal of Community Psychology, 31, 227–242.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Wandersman, A., Duffy, J., Flaspohler, P., Noonan, R., Lubell, K., Stillman, L., et al. (2008). Bridging the gap between prevention research and practice: The interactive systems framework for dissemination and implementation. American Journal of Community Psychology, 41, 171–181.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Weist, M. D., Myers, C. P., Hastings, E., Ghuman, H., & Han, Y. (1999). Psychosocial functioning of youth receiving mental health services in the schools versus community mental health centers. Community Mental Health Journal, 35, 69–81.PubMedCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Zhao, Y., & Frank, K. A. (2003). Factors affecting technology uses in schools: An ecological perspective. American Educational Research Journal, 40(4), 807–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Society for Community Research and Action 2010

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jennifer Watling Neal
    • 1
  • Zachary P. Neal
    • 2
  • Marc S. Atkins
    • 3
  • David B. Henry
    • 4
  • Stacy L. Frazier
    • 3
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyMichigan State UniversityEast LansingUSA
  3. 3.Institute for Juvenile Research, Department of PsychiatryUniversity of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA
  4. 4.Institute for Health Research & PolicySchool of Public Health, University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations