Advertisement

American Journal of Community Psychology

, Volume 44, Issue 1–2, pp 116–122 | Cite as

Building International Collaborative Capacity: Contributions of Community Psychologists to a European Network

  • Manuel García-RamírezEmail author
  • Virginia Paloma
  • Yolanda Suarez-Balcazar
  • Fabricio Balcazar
Original Paper

Abstract

Europe is in the process of building a more participative, just, and inclusive European Union. The European Social Fund, which is an initiative developed to actively promote multinational partnerships that address pressing social issues, is a good example of the European transformation. This article describes the steps taken to develop and evaluate the activities of an international network promoting collaborative capacity among regional partners involved in the prevention of labor discrimination toward immigrants in three European countries—Spain, Belgium, and Italy. An international team of community psychologists proposed an empowering approach to assess the collaborative capacity of the network. This approach consisted of three steps: (1) establishing a collaborative relationship among partners, (2) building collaborative capacity, and (3) evaluating the collaborative capacity of the network. We conclude with lessons learned from the process and provide recommendations for addressing the challenges inherent in international collaboration processes.

Keywords

European networks International collaborative capacity European Social Fund 

Notes

Acknowledgments

This project was funded, in part, by the European Community Initiative EQUAL (ES-ES333) and the Consejería de Gobernación, Junta de Andalucía (award # 18.15.04.5706).

References

  1. Brinkerhoff, J. M. (2002). Assessing and improving partnership relationships and outcomes: A proposed framework. Evaluation and Program Planning, 25(3), 215–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Connors, K., & Seifer, S. D. (2000). Partnership perspectives (Vol. 1(2)). San Francisco, CA: Community-Campus Partnerships for Health.Google Scholar
  3. European Commission. (2004). Equal guide on transnational co-operation 2004–2008. Retrieved October 10, 2008, from http://www.equalcr.cz/files/clanky/7/transnational_guide_en.pdf.
  4. European Commission. (2008). European Social Fund: What is the ESF? Retrieved October 17, 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/employment_social/esf/discover/esf_en.htm.
  5. European Union. (2008). Operational programme ‘Spain–Portugal’: Programme under the European territorial cooperation objective co-funded by the European Regional Development Fund (ERDF). Retrieved October 10, 2008, from http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/country/prordn/details_new.cfm?gv_PAY=ES&gv_reg=554&gv_PGM=1254&LAN=7&gv_per=2&gv_defL=7.
  6. Fetterman, D. M. (2002). Empowerment evaluation: Building communities of practice and a culture of learning. American Journal of community Psychology, 30(1), 89–102.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Fetterman, D. M., Kaftarian, S., & Wandersman, A. (Eds.). (1996). Empowerment evaluation: Knowledge and tools for self-assessment and accountability. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  8. Florin, P., Mitchell, R., Stevenson, J., & Klein, I. (2000). Predicting intermediate outcomes for prevention coalitions: A developmental perspective. Evaluation and Program Planning, 23(3), 341–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Foster-Fishman, P. G., Berkowitz, S., Lounsbury, D., Jacobson, S., & Allen, N. A. (2001). Building collaborative capacity in community coalitions. American Journal of Community Psychology, 29(2), 241–261.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. García-Ramírez, M., Martínez, M. F., & Santolaya, F. J. (2002). Integración social y empleo de inmigrantes: El programa integra-diversidad. Sevilla: Junta de Andalucía, Consejería de Asuntos Sociales.Google Scholar
  11. García-Ramírez, M., Suarez-Balcazar, Y., & Martínez, J. (2003). The role of community psychologists in a European Model of support services for immigrants. The Community Psychologist, 26(1), 42–43.Google Scholar
  12. Goodman, R. M., Speers, M. A., McLeroy, K., Fawcett, S., Kegler, M., Parker, E., et al. (1998). Identifying and defining the dimensions of community capacity to provide a basis for measurement. Health Education and Behavior, 25, 258–278.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Harper, G. W., & Salina, D. D. (2000). Building collaborative partnerships to improve community-based HIV prevention research: The university-CBO collaborative partnership (UCCP) model. Journal of Prevention and Intervention in the Community, 19(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Ingleby, D. & Schoorel, D. A. (2007). Proposal for a new COST Action: Health and social care for migrants and ethnic minorities in Europe. Available at http://www.cost.esf.org/index.php?id=233&action_number=IS0603.
  15. Lion, C., & Martini, P. (2006). The evaluation of a complex social program: Lesson learned from the experience of the European social fund. Evaluation and Program Planning, 29, 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Martínez, M. F., García-Ramírez, M. & Martínez, J. (2005). Informe Final de Evaluación Equal-Arena. Fondo Social Europeo. Junta de Andalucía. Available at http://www.juntadeandalucia.es/gobernacion/equalarena1/.
  17. Martínez, M., García-Ramírez, M., & Maya, I. (2000). Inserción socio-laboral de inmigrantes en Andalucía: El programa Horizon. Sevilla: Universidad de Sevilla, Junta de Andalucía.Google Scholar
  18. Maton, K., Perkins, D., Altman, D. G., Guttierez, L., Kelly, J., Rappaport, J., et al. (2006). Community-based interdisciplinary research: Introduction to the special issue. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 1–7.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Stockdill, S. H., Baizerman, M., & Compton, D. W. (2002). Toward a definition of the ECB process: A conversation with the ECB literature. New Directions in Evaluation, 93, 1–15.Google Scholar
  20. Suarez-Balcazar, Y., & García-Ramírez, M. (2003). Internet y cambio comunitario en un barrio empobrecido de Chicago: Implicaciones para Andalucía [The Internet and Community Change in a Chicago Slum: Implications for Andalucía]. Apuntes de Psicología, 21(3), 533–548.Google Scholar
  21. Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Harper, G. W., & Lewis, R. (2005). An interactive and contextual model of community university collaborations for research and action. Health Education and Behavior, 32(1), 84–101.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Suarez-Balcazar, Y., Hellwig, M., Kouba, J., Redmond, L., Martinez, L., Block, D., et al. (2006). The making of an interdisciplinary partnership: The case of the Chicago food system collaborative. American Journal of Community Psychology, 38, 113–123.CrossRefPubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2009

Authors and Affiliations

  • Manuel García-Ramírez
    • 1
    Email author
  • Virginia Paloma
    • 1
  • Yolanda Suarez-Balcazar
    • 2
  • Fabricio Balcazar
    • 2
  1. 1.Departamento de Psicología Social (Facultad de Psicología)Universidad de SevillaSevilleSpain
  2. 2.University of Illinois at ChicagoChicagoUSA

Personalised recommendations